Performance Evaluation of Three Diagnostic Methods for Soil-Transmitted Helminth Infections among Schoolchildren in Amhara Region, Northwest Ethiopia.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Journal of Tropical Medicine Pub Date : 2023-06-26 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2023/9697165
Shegaw Belay, Getaneh Alemu, Tadesse Hailu
{"title":"Performance Evaluation of Three Diagnostic Methods for Soil-Transmitted Helminth Infections among Schoolchildren in Amhara Region, Northwest Ethiopia.","authors":"Shegaw Belay, Getaneh Alemu, Tadesse Hailu","doi":"10.1155/2023/9697165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Soil-transmitted helminths are parasitic nematodes found in the intestine. They are more prevalent in the tropics and subtropics, including Ethiopia. However, low-sensitive direct wet mount microscopy fails to detect soil-transmitted helminths among infected cases. Therefore, more sensitive and cost-effective diagnostic methods are urgently needed to minimize soil-transmitted helminthiasis morbidity.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare and evaluate the performance of diagnostic methods for soil-transmitted helminths against the \"gold\" standard.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 421 schoolchildren from May to July, 2022 in the Amhara Region. Study participants were selected using a systematic random sampling technique. Stool samples were processed via Kato-Katz, McMaster, and spontaneous tube sedimentation techniques. Data were entered into epi-data version 3.1 and analyzed using SPSS version 25. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated against the combined result as a \"gold\" standard. The strength of agreement between the diagnostic methods was determined by the Kappa value.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall prevalence of soil-transmitted helminths was 32.8% (95% CI: 28.2-37.8%) using a combination of methods. The detection rates of Kato-Katz, McMaster, and spontaneous tube sedimentation were 28.5% (95% CI: 24.2-33.2%), 30% (95% CI: 25.6-34.8%), and 30.5% (95% CI: 26.1-35.3%), respectively. Sensitivity and negative predictive values were 87.1% (95% CI: 80.2-92.3%) and 95.1% (95% CI: 92.6-96.8%) for Kato-Katz; 91.7% (95% CI: 85.6-95.6%) and 96.5% (95% CI: 94.1-98.0%) for McMaster; and 93.2% (95% CI: 87.5-96.8%) and 97.1% (95% CI: 94.7-98.4%) for spontaneous tube sedimentation. Kappa values of Kato-Katz, McMaster, and spontaneous tube sedimentation for the diagnosis of soil-transmitted helminths were 0.901, 0.937, and 0.948, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Kato-Katz, McMaster, and spontaneous tube sedimentation techniques had comparable sensitivity with almost perfect agreement for the detection of soil-transmitted helminths. Therefore, the spontaneous tube sedimentation technique can be used as an alternative diagnostic method for soil-transmitted helminth infections in endemic countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":17527,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Tropical Medicine","volume":"2023 ","pages":"9697165"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10317582/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Tropical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/9697165","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Soil-transmitted helminths are parasitic nematodes found in the intestine. They are more prevalent in the tropics and subtropics, including Ethiopia. However, low-sensitive direct wet mount microscopy fails to detect soil-transmitted helminths among infected cases. Therefore, more sensitive and cost-effective diagnostic methods are urgently needed to minimize soil-transmitted helminthiasis morbidity.

Objective: This study aimed to compare and evaluate the performance of diagnostic methods for soil-transmitted helminths against the "gold" standard.

Methods: An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 421 schoolchildren from May to July, 2022 in the Amhara Region. Study participants were selected using a systematic random sampling technique. Stool samples were processed via Kato-Katz, McMaster, and spontaneous tube sedimentation techniques. Data were entered into epi-data version 3.1 and analyzed using SPSS version 25. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated against the combined result as a "gold" standard. The strength of agreement between the diagnostic methods was determined by the Kappa value.

Results: The overall prevalence of soil-transmitted helminths was 32.8% (95% CI: 28.2-37.8%) using a combination of methods. The detection rates of Kato-Katz, McMaster, and spontaneous tube sedimentation were 28.5% (95% CI: 24.2-33.2%), 30% (95% CI: 25.6-34.8%), and 30.5% (95% CI: 26.1-35.3%), respectively. Sensitivity and negative predictive values were 87.1% (95% CI: 80.2-92.3%) and 95.1% (95% CI: 92.6-96.8%) for Kato-Katz; 91.7% (95% CI: 85.6-95.6%) and 96.5% (95% CI: 94.1-98.0%) for McMaster; and 93.2% (95% CI: 87.5-96.8%) and 97.1% (95% CI: 94.7-98.4%) for spontaneous tube sedimentation. Kappa values of Kato-Katz, McMaster, and spontaneous tube sedimentation for the diagnosis of soil-transmitted helminths were 0.901, 0.937, and 0.948, respectively.

Conclusion: Kato-Katz, McMaster, and spontaneous tube sedimentation techniques had comparable sensitivity with almost perfect agreement for the detection of soil-transmitted helminths. Therefore, the spontaneous tube sedimentation technique can be used as an alternative diagnostic method for soil-transmitted helminth infections in endemic countries.

埃塞俄比亚西北部阿姆哈拉地区学童土壤传播蠕虫感染的三种诊断方法的性能评估。
背景:土壤传播蠕虫是寄生在肠道中的线虫。它们在包括埃塞俄比亚在内的热带和亚热带地区较为普遍。然而,灵敏度低的直接湿装片显微镜无法在感染病例中检测出土壤传播蠕虫。因此,迫切需要更灵敏、更具成本效益的诊断方法,以尽量降低土壤传播蠕虫病的发病率:本研究旨在比较和评估土壤传播蠕虫病诊断方法与 "金 "标准的性能:2022 年 5 月至 7 月,在阿姆哈拉地区的 421 名学童中开展了一项基于机构的横断面研究。研究参与者采用系统随机抽样技术选出。粪便样本通过卡托-卡茨、麦克马斯特和自发管沉淀技术进行处理。数据输入 epi-data 3.1 版,并使用 SPSS 25 版进行分析。灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值是根据作为 "金 "标准的综合结果计算得出的。诊断方法之间的一致性由 Kappa 值决定:结果:采用多种方法检测的土壤传播蠕虫的总体流行率为 32.8%(95% CI:28.2-37.8%)。卡托-卡茨法、麦克马斯特法和自发管沉降法的检出率分别为 28.5%(95% CI:24.2-33.2%)、30%(95% CI:25.6-34.8%)和 30.5%(95% CI:26.1-35.3%)。Kato-Katz的灵敏度和阴性预测值分别为87.1%(95% CI:80.2-92.3%)和95.1%(95% CI:92.6-96.8%);McMaster的灵敏度和阴性预测值分别为91.7%(95% CI:85.6-95.6%)和96.5%(95% CI:94.1-98.0%);自发管沉积的灵敏度和阴性预测值分别为93.2%(95% CI:87.5-96.8%)和97.1%(95% CI:94.7-98.4%)。卡托-卡茨、麦克马斯特和自发试管沉降法诊断土壤传播蠕虫的 Kappa 值分别为 0.901、0.937 和 0.948:结论:卡托-卡茨、麦克马斯特和自发试管沉降法检测土壤传播蠕虫的灵敏度相当,几乎完全一致。因此,自发试管沉降技术可作为地方病流行国家土壤传播蠕虫感染的替代诊断方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Tropical Medicine
Journal of Tropical Medicine Immunology and Microbiology-Parasitology
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Tropical Medicine is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies on all aspects of tropical diseases. Articles on the pathology, diagnosis, and treatment of tropical diseases, parasites and their hosts, epidemiology, and public health issues will be considered. Journal of Tropical Medicine aims to facilitate the communication of advances addressing global health and mortality relating to tropical diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信