Integrating between-session homework in psychotherapy: A systematic review of immediate in-session and intermediate outcomes.

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Psychotherapy Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-27 DOI:10.1037/pst0000488
Truls Ryum, Mia Bennion, Nikolaos Kazantzis
{"title":"Integrating between-session homework in psychotherapy: A systematic review of immediate in-session and intermediate outcomes.","authors":"Truls Ryum, Mia Bennion, Nikolaos Kazantzis","doi":"10.1037/pst0000488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[Correction Notice: An Erratum for this article was reported in Vol 60(3) of <i>Psychotherapy</i> (see record 2023-99100-002). In the article (https://doi.org/10.1037/ pst0000488), the number of included studies in Figure 2 omitted two studies that were added to the literature synthesis. Therefore, the following has been added to the Reports excluded box in Figure 2: A further two studies were added to the research synthesis by author knowledge. All versions of this article have been corrected.] This article reviews the evidence for between-session homework (BSH) in individual psychotherapy. Whereas previous reviews have demonstrated a positive association between-client compliance with BSH and distal treatment outcomes; here, we pay particular attention to therapist behaviors that may promote client engagement with BSH assessed as immediate (in-session) and intermediate (session-to-session) outcomes, and moderators of these effects. For our systematic review, we identified 25 studies with 1,304 clients and 118 therapists, mostly on cognitive behavioral therapy such as exposure-based treatments with depression and anxiety disorders. A box score approach was utilized to summarize findings. Results for immediate outcomes were mixed but neutral. Results for intermediate outcomes were positive. Presenting a convincing rationale, being flexible in collaboratively designing, planning, and reviewing homework tasks in accordance with the clients' goals, aligning BSH with the clients' takeaways from the session and providing a written summary of homework and rationale, are some therapist behaviors that can promote client engagement with BSH. We conclude with research limitations, training implications, and therapeutic practices. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20910,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy","volume":"60 3","pages":"306-319"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000488","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

[Correction Notice: An Erratum for this article was reported in Vol 60(3) of Psychotherapy (see record 2023-99100-002). In the article (https://doi.org/10.1037/ pst0000488), the number of included studies in Figure 2 omitted two studies that were added to the literature synthesis. Therefore, the following has been added to the Reports excluded box in Figure 2: A further two studies were added to the research synthesis by author knowledge. All versions of this article have been corrected.] This article reviews the evidence for between-session homework (BSH) in individual psychotherapy. Whereas previous reviews have demonstrated a positive association between-client compliance with BSH and distal treatment outcomes; here, we pay particular attention to therapist behaviors that may promote client engagement with BSH assessed as immediate (in-session) and intermediate (session-to-session) outcomes, and moderators of these effects. For our systematic review, we identified 25 studies with 1,304 clients and 118 therapists, mostly on cognitive behavioral therapy such as exposure-based treatments with depression and anxiety disorders. A box score approach was utilized to summarize findings. Results for immediate outcomes were mixed but neutral. Results for intermediate outcomes were positive. Presenting a convincing rationale, being flexible in collaboratively designing, planning, and reviewing homework tasks in accordance with the clients' goals, aligning BSH with the clients' takeaways from the session and providing a written summary of homework and rationale, are some therapist behaviors that can promote client engagement with BSH. We conclude with research limitations, training implications, and therapeutic practices. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

在心理治疗中整合疗程间家庭作业:对即时疗程和中期疗效的系统回顾。
[更正通知:心理治疗》(Psychotherapy)第 60(3)卷(参见记录 2023-99100-002)报道了本文的勘误(Erratum)。在该文章(https://doi.org/10.1037/ pst0000488)中,图 2 中的纳入研究数量遗漏了文献综述中新增的两项研究。因此,在图 2 中排除的报告框中增加了以下内容:根据作者的知识,研究综述中又增加了两项研究。本文所有版本均已更正]。本文回顾了个体心理治疗中疗程间家庭作业(BSH)的相关证据。之前的综述表明,客户对 BSH 的依从性与远端治疗结果之间存在正相关;在此,我们特别关注治疗师的行为,这些行为可能会促进客户参与 BSH,并被评估为即时(疗程内)和中期(疗程间)结果,以及这些效果的调节因素。在我们的系统性综述中,我们确定了 25 项研究,涉及 1304 名客户和 118 名治疗师,大部分研究涉及认知行为疗法,如基于暴露的抑郁症和焦虑症治疗。我们采用了方框评分法来总结研究结果。对直接结果的研究结果不一,但都是中性的。中期结果是积极的。提出令人信服的理由,根据客户的目标灵活地合作设计、规划和审查家庭作业任务,使 BSH 与客户在疗程中的收获保持一致,以及提供家庭作业和理由的书面总结,这些都是可以促进客户参与 BSH 的一些治疗师行为。最后,我们总结了研究的局限性、培训意义和治疗实践。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychotherapy
Psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Psychotherapy Theory, Research, Practice, Training publishes a wide variety of articles relevant to the field of psychotherapy. The journal strives to foster interactions among individuals involved with training, practice theory, and research since all areas are essential to psychotherapy. This journal is an invaluable resource for practicing clinical and counseling psychologists, social workers, and mental health professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信