Self-correction of posterior crossbite in childhood: a systematic review of long-term follow-up studies.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Bianka Costa do Nascimento, Cibelle Cristina Oliveira Dos Santos, Milena Cristina Costa Dos Santos, David Normando
{"title":"Self-correction of posterior crossbite in childhood: a systematic review of long-term follow-up studies.","authors":"Bianka Costa do Nascimento, Cibelle Cristina Oliveira Dos Santos, Milena Cristina Costa Dos Santos, David Normando","doi":"10.1093/ejo/cjad034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The concept that posterior crossbite is not self-correcting has been controversial in the literature.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the incidence of self-correction of crossbite in different stages of dentition in childhood.</p><p><strong>Search methods and selection criteria: </strong>A bibliographic search using the acronym PECOS was performed in five databases and in partial grey literature. Studies evaluating children with posterior crossbite in the deciduous or mixed dentition at initial examination and followed for at least 3 years were included.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>The data extraction of the studies included presents information on authorship, clinical characteristics, main results, and conclusions. The risk of bias in the studies was evaluated through the Joanna Briggs Institute tool. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 3045 references identified, seven cohort studies met the eligibility criteria. The studies evaluated patients in transition from deciduous to mixed, mixed to permanent, and deciduous to mixed dentition. Two studies had a low risk of bias, three had a moderate risk, and two had a high risk of bias. The results showed posterior crossbite self-correction frequencies ranging from 12.2 to 77.1% during the transition from primary to mixed dentition, approximately 16% from mixed to permanent dentition, and a range from 20 to 82.8% from deciduous to permanent dentition. The level of certainty of the evidence generated ranged from very low to moderate.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The observational design of the studies, without adequate control for confounding factors, and non-classification of the samples considering the types or the severity of the posterior crossbite.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The self-correction of posterior crossbite in childhood is possible. However, the results of this research do not allow to affirm how often the self-correction of posterior crossbite can occur. New studies that assess factors associated with the occurrence of self-correction of this malocclusion, including oral habits, may increase the certainty of the evidence.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42022311935.</p>","PeriodicalId":11989,"journal":{"name":"European journal of orthodontics","volume":" ","pages":"739-746"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjad034","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The concept that posterior crossbite is not self-correcting has been controversial in the literature.

Objective: To evaluate the incidence of self-correction of crossbite in different stages of dentition in childhood.

Search methods and selection criteria: A bibliographic search using the acronym PECOS was performed in five databases and in partial grey literature. Studies evaluating children with posterior crossbite in the deciduous or mixed dentition at initial examination and followed for at least 3 years were included.

Data collection and analysis: The data extraction of the studies included presents information on authorship, clinical characteristics, main results, and conclusions. The risk of bias in the studies was evaluated through the Joanna Briggs Institute tool. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE tool.

Results: Among the 3045 references identified, seven cohort studies met the eligibility criteria. The studies evaluated patients in transition from deciduous to mixed, mixed to permanent, and deciduous to mixed dentition. Two studies had a low risk of bias, three had a moderate risk, and two had a high risk of bias. The results showed posterior crossbite self-correction frequencies ranging from 12.2 to 77.1% during the transition from primary to mixed dentition, approximately 16% from mixed to permanent dentition, and a range from 20 to 82.8% from deciduous to permanent dentition. The level of certainty of the evidence generated ranged from very low to moderate.

Limitations: The observational design of the studies, without adequate control for confounding factors, and non-classification of the samples considering the types or the severity of the posterior crossbite.

Conclusion: The self-correction of posterior crossbite in childhood is possible. However, the results of this research do not allow to affirm how often the self-correction of posterior crossbite can occur. New studies that assess factors associated with the occurrence of self-correction of this malocclusion, including oral habits, may increase the certainty of the evidence.

Registration: PROSPERO CRD42022311935.

儿童后牙合的自我矫正:长期随访研究的系统回顾。
背景:后牙合不能自我矫正的概念在文献中一直存在争议。目的:探讨儿童不同牙列阶段十字咬合自我矫正的发生率。检索方法和选择标准:在五个数据库和部分灰色文献中使用首字母缩略词PECOS进行书目检索。在初步检查时评估乳牙列或混合牙列后牙合儿童并随访至少3年的研究包括在内。资料收集和分析:纳入研究的资料提取包括作者、临床特征、主要结果和结论等信息。研究中的偏倚风险通过乔安娜布里格斯研究所的工具进行评估。使用GRADE工具评估证据的确定性。结果:在3045篇文献中,有7篇队列研究符合入选标准。这些研究评估了从乳牙到混合牙列、混合牙列到永久牙列以及乳牙到混合牙列的患者。两项研究有低偏倚风险,三项有中等偏倚风险,两项有高偏倚风险。结果表明,从初级牙列到混合牙列的自我矫正频率为12.2 ~ 77.1%,从混合牙列到永久牙列的自我矫正频率约为16%,从乳牙列到永久牙列的自我矫正频率为20% ~ 82.8%。所产生的证据的确定程度从极低到中等不等。局限性:研究的观察性设计,没有对混杂因素进行充分的控制,并且没有根据后牙合的类型或严重程度对样本进行分类。结论:儿童后牙合的自我矫正是可行的。然而,本研究的结果并不能确定后牙合自我矫正的发生频率。新的研究评估了与发生这种错牙合的自我矫正相关的因素,包括口腔习惯,可能会增加证据的确定性。注册号:PROSPERO CRD42022311935。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European journal of orthodontics
European journal of orthodontics 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
71
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Orthodontics publishes papers of excellence on all aspects of orthodontics including craniofacial development and growth. The emphasis of the journal is on full research papers. Succinct and carefully prepared papers are favoured in terms of impact as well as readability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信