Varicocelectomy for scrotal pain: Is it effective?

IF 0.7 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Urology Annals Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-17 DOI:10.4103/UA.UA_64_20
Abdullah Alkhayal, Sahar Aljumaiah, Abdullah Alhagbani, Muhannad Alnahdi, Saad Abumelha, Khalid Alrabeeah
{"title":"Varicocelectomy for scrotal pain: Is it effective?","authors":"Abdullah Alkhayal,&nbsp;Sahar Aljumaiah,&nbsp;Abdullah Alhagbani,&nbsp;Muhannad Alnahdi,&nbsp;Saad Abumelha,&nbsp;Khalid Alrabeeah","doi":"10.4103/UA.UA_64_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Varicocelectomy is the prevailing management of scrotal pain secondary to varicocele. However, the literature is controversial on this topic. Some data showed that pain may persist after the surgery even if the varicocele is not detected postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives of the study were to identify the effect of varicocelectomy in patients with chronic scrotal pain, to report the association between the clinical grade and postoperative pain resolution, and to identify the need for a secondary procedure after varicocelectomy to control the pain.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study of 47 patients who underwent varicocelectomy between March 2016 and December 2018.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperatively, the pain totally resolved after surgery in 64.3% of patients with scrotal pain; it improved in 21.4%, 11.9% have persistent pain, and the pain got worse in only 2.4%. Our study showed 100% complete resolution or improvement with Grade I, 85.7% in Grade II, and 81.3% in Grade III. In addition, all patients who underwent bilateral varicocelectomy had pain that either completely resolved or improved postoperatively. On the other hand, all patients who had persistent pain or pain worsening postoperatively had unilateral varicocelectomy. An additional intervention for postoperative pain control was needed in only 14% of patients, 7% of them underwent embolization, 4.7% had a cord block, and 2.3% were sent to a pain clinic.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Varicocelectomy offers good outcomes in most patients with varicocele-related scrotal pain. The most significant predictor for success was low grade and bilaterality. However, there is a subset of patients whose symptoms will not improve postoperatively. Careful preoperative counseling and expectation management are crucial when discussing surgical options for those patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23633,"journal":{"name":"Urology Annals","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/dc/e6/UA-15-311.PMC10471819.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Annals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_64_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Varicocelectomy is the prevailing management of scrotal pain secondary to varicocele. However, the literature is controversial on this topic. Some data showed that pain may persist after the surgery even if the varicocele is not detected postoperatively.

Objectives: The objectives of the study were to identify the effect of varicocelectomy in patients with chronic scrotal pain, to report the association between the clinical grade and postoperative pain resolution, and to identify the need for a secondary procedure after varicocelectomy to control the pain.

Materials and methods: This was a retrospective study of 47 patients who underwent varicocelectomy between March 2016 and December 2018.

Results: Postoperatively, the pain totally resolved after surgery in 64.3% of patients with scrotal pain; it improved in 21.4%, 11.9% have persistent pain, and the pain got worse in only 2.4%. Our study showed 100% complete resolution or improvement with Grade I, 85.7% in Grade II, and 81.3% in Grade III. In addition, all patients who underwent bilateral varicocelectomy had pain that either completely resolved or improved postoperatively. On the other hand, all patients who had persistent pain or pain worsening postoperatively had unilateral varicocelectomy. An additional intervention for postoperative pain control was needed in only 14% of patients, 7% of them underwent embolization, 4.7% had a cord block, and 2.3% were sent to a pain clinic.

Conclusion: Varicocelectomy offers good outcomes in most patients with varicocele-related scrotal pain. The most significant predictor for success was low grade and bilaterality. However, there is a subset of patients whose symptoms will not improve postoperatively. Careful preoperative counseling and expectation management are crucial when discussing surgical options for those patients.

Abstract Image

精索静脉曲张切开术治疗阴囊疼痛:有效吗?
导语:精索静脉曲张切开术是治疗精索静脉曲张继发阴囊疼痛的主要方法。然而,有关这一主题的文献存在争议。一些数据表明,即使术后未发现精索静脉曲张,术后疼痛也可能持续。目的:本研究的目的是确定精索静脉曲张切除术对慢性阴囊疼痛患者的影响,报告临床分级与术后疼痛缓解之间的关系,并确定精索静脉结扎术后是否需要进行二次手术来控制疼痛。材料和方法:这是对2016年3月至2018年12月期间接受精索静脉曲张切除术的47名患者的回顾性研究。结果:术后,64.3%的阴囊疼痛患者术后疼痛完全缓解;21.4%的患者病情好转,11.9%的患者有持续性疼痛,只有2.4%的患者病情加重。我们的研究显示,I级100%完全缓解或好转,II级85.7%,III级81.3%。此外,所有接受双侧精索静脉曲张切除术的患者术后疼痛均完全缓解或改善。另一方面,所有术后持续疼痛或疼痛恶化的患者都进行了单侧精索静脉曲张切除术。只有14%的患者需要额外的术后疼痛控制干预,其中7%接受了栓塞治疗,4.7%接受了脊髓阻滞治疗,2.3%被送往疼痛诊所。结论:精索静脉曲张切开术可为大多数精索静脉曲张相关阴囊疼痛患者提供良好的治疗效果。成功的最重要预测因素是低级别和双侧性。然而,有一部分患者的症状在术后不会改善。在讨论这些患者的手术选择时,仔细的术前咨询和期望管理至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urology Annals
Urology Annals UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
审稿时长
31 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信