The Global Forest Health Crisis: A Public-Good Social Dilemma in Need of International Collective Action.

IF 9.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
Annual review of phytopathology Pub Date : 2023-09-05 Epub Date: 2023-05-30 DOI:10.1146/annurev-phyto-021722-024626
Geoffrey M Williams, Matthew D Ginzel, Zhao Ma, Damian C Adams, Faith Campbell, Gary M Lovett, María Belén Pildain, Kenneth F Raffa, Kamal J K Gandhi, Alberto Santini, Richard A Sniezko, Michael J Wingfield, Pierluigi Bonello
{"title":"The Global Forest Health Crisis: A Public-Good Social Dilemma in Need of International Collective Action.","authors":"Geoffrey M Williams,&nbsp;Matthew D Ginzel,&nbsp;Zhao Ma,&nbsp;Damian C Adams,&nbsp;Faith Campbell,&nbsp;Gary M Lovett,&nbsp;María Belén Pildain,&nbsp;Kenneth F Raffa,&nbsp;Kamal J K Gandhi,&nbsp;Alberto Santini,&nbsp;Richard A Sniezko,&nbsp;Michael J Wingfield,&nbsp;Pierluigi Bonello","doi":"10.1146/annurev-phyto-021722-024626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Society is confronted by interconnected threats to ecological sustainability. Among these is the devastation of forests by destructive non-native pathogens and insects introduced through global trade, leading to the loss of critical ecosystem services and a global forest health crisis. We argue that the forest health crisis is a public-good social dilemma and propose a response framework that incorporates principles of collective action. This framework enables scientists to better engage policymakers and empowers the public to advocate for proactive biosecurity and forest health management. Collective action in forest health features broadly inclusive stakeholder engagement to build trust and set goals; accountability for destructive pest introductions; pooled support for weakest-link partners; and inclusion of intrinsic and nonmarket values of forest ecosystems in risk assessment. We provide short-term and longer-term measures that incorporate the above principles to shift the societal and ecological forest health paradigm to a more resilient state.</p>","PeriodicalId":8251,"journal":{"name":"Annual review of phytopathology","volume":"61 ","pages":"377-401"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual review of phytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-021722-024626","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Society is confronted by interconnected threats to ecological sustainability. Among these is the devastation of forests by destructive non-native pathogens and insects introduced through global trade, leading to the loss of critical ecosystem services and a global forest health crisis. We argue that the forest health crisis is a public-good social dilemma and propose a response framework that incorporates principles of collective action. This framework enables scientists to better engage policymakers and empowers the public to advocate for proactive biosecurity and forest health management. Collective action in forest health features broadly inclusive stakeholder engagement to build trust and set goals; accountability for destructive pest introductions; pooled support for weakest-link partners; and inclusion of intrinsic and nonmarket values of forest ecosystems in risk assessment. We provide short-term and longer-term measures that incorporate the above principles to shift the societal and ecological forest health paradigm to a more resilient state.

全球森林健康危机:需要国际集体行动的公益社会困境。
社会面临着对生态可持续性的相互关联的威胁。其中包括通过全球贸易引入的破坏性非本土病原体和昆虫对森林的破坏,导致关键生态系统服务的丧失和全球森林健康危机。我们认为,森林健康危机是一个公共利益的社会困境,并提出了一个包含集体行动原则的应对框架。这一框架使科学家能够更好地与决策者接触,并使公众能够倡导积极的生物安全和森林健康管理。森林健康集体行动的特点是广泛包容的利益攸关方参与,以建立信任和设定目标;引入破坏性有害生物的责任;集中支持最薄弱环节的合作伙伴;以及将森林生态系统的内在价值和非市场价值纳入风险评估。我们提供了纳入上述原则的短期和长期措施,以将社会和生态森林健康模式转变为更具弹性的状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annual review of phytopathology
Annual review of phytopathology 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
16.60
自引率
1.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: The Annual Review of Phytopathology, established in 1963, covers major advancements in plant pathology, including plant disease diagnosis, pathogens, host-pathogen Interactions, epidemiology and ecology, breeding for resistance and plant disease management, and includes a special section on the development of concepts. The journal is now open access through Annual Reviews' Subscribe to Open program, with articles published under a CC BY license.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信