Creative thinking in Tourette's syndrome: A comparative study of patients and healthy controls.

IF 1.8 4区 心理学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Laura Colautti, Sara Magenes, Sabrina Rago, Stefania Camerin, Carlotta Zanaboni Dina, Alessandro Antonietti, Alice Cancer
{"title":"Creative thinking in Tourette's syndrome: A comparative study of patients and healthy controls.","authors":"Laura Colautti, Sara Magenes, Sabrina Rago, Stefania Camerin, Carlotta Zanaboni Dina, Alessandro Antonietti, Alice Cancer","doi":"10.1080/13803395.2023.2251644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Tourette's syndrome is a neurological disorder characterized by tics, that may interfere with patients' everyday life. Research suggested that creative thinking (namely, divergent and convergent thinking) could help patients cope with their symptoms, and therefore it can be a resource in non-pharmacological interventions. The present study aimed at investigating (i) possible differences in creative thinking between Tourette's syndrome patients and healthy controls and (ii) whether creative thinking can support patients in coping with their symptomatology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A group of 25 Tourette's syndrome patients and 25 matched healthy controls underwent an assessment of creative thinking, fluid intelligence, and depressive symptoms. Creative thinking was compared between patients and healthy controls after controlling for fluid intelligence and depressive symptoms. Moreover, the moderating role of divergent and convergent thinking on the subjective impact of tics was tested in a group of 30 patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Tourette's syndrome patients outperformed healthy controls in convergent thinking. Moreover, divergent thinking was found as a significant moderator of the relationship between tics severity and the subjective impact in Tourette's syndrome patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings highlighted the specific impact of convergent and divergent thinking on Tourette's syndrome patients. Considering the supportive role of creative thinking in Tourette's syndrome, our results confirm that higher levels of divergent thinking may reduce the tic-related discomfort. These findings suggest the potential positive implications of creative thinking in non-pharmacological interventions for Tourette's syndrome.</p>","PeriodicalId":15382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2023.2251644","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Tourette's syndrome is a neurological disorder characterized by tics, that may interfere with patients' everyday life. Research suggested that creative thinking (namely, divergent and convergent thinking) could help patients cope with their symptoms, and therefore it can be a resource in non-pharmacological interventions. The present study aimed at investigating (i) possible differences in creative thinking between Tourette's syndrome patients and healthy controls and (ii) whether creative thinking can support patients in coping with their symptomatology.

Methods: A group of 25 Tourette's syndrome patients and 25 matched healthy controls underwent an assessment of creative thinking, fluid intelligence, and depressive symptoms. Creative thinking was compared between patients and healthy controls after controlling for fluid intelligence and depressive symptoms. Moreover, the moderating role of divergent and convergent thinking on the subjective impact of tics was tested in a group of 30 patients.

Results: Tourette's syndrome patients outperformed healthy controls in convergent thinking. Moreover, divergent thinking was found as a significant moderator of the relationship between tics severity and the subjective impact in Tourette's syndrome patients.

Conclusions: Findings highlighted the specific impact of convergent and divergent thinking on Tourette's syndrome patients. Considering the supportive role of creative thinking in Tourette's syndrome, our results confirm that higher levels of divergent thinking may reduce the tic-related discomfort. These findings suggest the potential positive implications of creative thinking in non-pharmacological interventions for Tourette's syndrome.

图雷特综合征患者与健康对照的创造性思维比较研究
导语:抽动秽语综合征是一种以抽搐为特征的神经系统疾病,可能会干扰患者的日常生活。研究表明,创造性思维(即发散和趋同思维)可以帮助患者应对症状,因此它可以成为非药物干预的资源。本研究旨在调查(i)抽动秽语综合征患者和健康对照组在创造性思维方面的可能差异,以及(ii)创造性思维是否可以支持患者应对其症状。方法:对25名抽动秽语综合征患者和25名匹配的健康对照进行创造性思维、液体智力和抑郁症状评估。在控制了液体智力和抑郁症状后,比较了患者和健康对照组的创造性思维。此外,在一组30名患者中测试了发散和收敛思维对抽搐的主观影响的调节作用。结果:抽动秽语综合征患者在收敛思维方面优于健康对照组。此外,在抽动秽语综合征患者中,发散性思维是抽动秽语严重程度与主观影响之间关系的重要调节因素。结论:研究结果突出了趋同和发散思维对抽动秽语综合征患者的具体影响。考虑到创造性思维在抽动秽语综合征中的支持作用,我们的研究结果证实,更高水平的发散性思维可以减少抽动秽语相关的不适。这些发现表明创造性思维对抽动秽语综合征的非药物干预具有潜在的积极意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
52
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology ( JCEN) publishes research on the neuropsychological consequences of brain disease, disorders, and dysfunction, and aims to promote the integration of theories, methods, and research findings in clinical and experimental neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of JCEN is to publish original empirical research pertaining to brain-behavior relationships and neuropsychological manifestations of brain disease. Theoretical and methodological papers, critical reviews of content areas, and theoretically-relevant case studies are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信