How cigarette excise tax pass-through to prices responds to the uptake and evolution of e-cigarettes (ECs).

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Yanyun He, Shaoying Ma, Qian Yang, Ce Shang
{"title":"How cigarette excise tax pass-through to prices responds to the uptake and evolution of e-cigarettes (ECs).","authors":"Yanyun He, Shaoying Ma, Qian Yang, Ce Shang","doi":"10.1136/tc-2023-058078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>How excise taxes are passed through to prices determines whether tax policies will be effective in changing smoking behaviours. Though previous literature has documented that cigarette taxes are overly shifted to prices, there is limited evidence on how cigarette tax pass-through to prices is affected by the uptake and evolution of e-cigarettes (ECs) in the US market.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigates how cigarette excise tax pass-through rate varied by price levels (the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentile prices) and the uptake and evolution of ECs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Tax pass-through rates were assessed using ordinary least squares regressions while controlling for state, year and month fixed effects. Different trends were then tested for the pre-EC uptake era (2006-2011), EC uptake era (2012-2016) and the evolution of nicotine salt-based ECs era (2017 and later).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Cigarette excise taxes were fully shifted to the 25th and 50th percentile prices and overly shifted to the 75th percentile prices at a 1:1.1 rate. While cigarette excise taxes had a continuous impact on raising prices, the tax pass-through rates were lower for lower priced cigarettes, and states imposed lower taxes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Continuing to raise cigarette taxes may be needed to create financial incentives to encourage people who smoke to switch to ECs. In addition, continuing to raise cigarette taxes and additional pricing policies such as price promotion restrictions are needed to increase retail prices and reduce price minimisation opportunities.</p>","PeriodicalId":23145,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Control","volume":" ","pages":"85-91"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10915895/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/tc-2023-058078","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: How excise taxes are passed through to prices determines whether tax policies will be effective in changing smoking behaviours. Though previous literature has documented that cigarette taxes are overly shifted to prices, there is limited evidence on how cigarette tax pass-through to prices is affected by the uptake and evolution of e-cigarettes (ECs) in the US market.

Objective: This study investigates how cigarette excise tax pass-through rate varied by price levels (the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentile prices) and the uptake and evolution of ECs.

Methods: Tax pass-through rates were assessed using ordinary least squares regressions while controlling for state, year and month fixed effects. Different trends were then tested for the pre-EC uptake era (2006-2011), EC uptake era (2012-2016) and the evolution of nicotine salt-based ECs era (2017 and later).

Findings: Cigarette excise taxes were fully shifted to the 25th and 50th percentile prices and overly shifted to the 75th percentile prices at a 1:1.1 rate. While cigarette excise taxes had a continuous impact on raising prices, the tax pass-through rates were lower for lower priced cigarettes, and states imposed lower taxes.

Conclusions: Continuing to raise cigarette taxes may be needed to create financial incentives to encourage people who smoke to switch to ECs. In addition, continuing to raise cigarette taxes and additional pricing policies such as price promotion restrictions are needed to increase retail prices and reduce price minimisation opportunities.

卷烟消费税转嫁到价格上如何应对电子烟(EC)的吸收和演变。
背景:消费税如何传递到价格决定了税收政策能否有效改变吸烟行为。尽管以往的文献记载了卷烟税过度转嫁到价格上的情况,但关于卷烟税转嫁到价格上的情况如何受到美国市场上电子烟(EC)的吸收和演变的影响,目前证据还很有限:本研究调查了卷烟消费税转嫁率如何随价格水平(第 25、50 和 75 百分位数价格)以及电子烟的吸收和演变而变化:采用普通最小二乘法回归评估税收转嫁率,同时控制州、年和月的固定效应。然后测试了前电子烟摄入时代(2006-2011 年)、电子烟摄入时代(2012-2016 年)和基于尼古丁盐的电子烟演变时代(2017 年及以后)的不同趋势:卷烟消费税以 1:1.1 的比例完全转向第 25 和 50 百分位数价格,并过度转向第 75 百分位数价格。虽然卷烟消费税对提高价格有持续影响,但低价卷烟的税收转嫁率较低,各州征收的税率也较低:结论:可能需要继续提高卷烟税,以创造经济激励措施,鼓励吸烟者改用电子烟。此外,还需要继续提高卷烟税,并采取额外的定价政策,如价格促销限制,以提高零售价格,减少价格最小化的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tobacco Control
Tobacco Control 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
26.90%
发文量
223
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Tobacco Control is an international peer-reviewed journal covering the nature and consequences of tobacco use worldwide; tobacco''s effects on population health, the economy, the environment, and society; efforts to prevent and control the global tobacco epidemic through population-level education and policy changes; the ethical dimensions of tobacco control policies; and the activities of the tobacco industry and its allies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信