Intraoperative Blood Pressure Lability Acts as a Key Mediator in the Impacts of Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy on Postoperative Complications in Patients Undergoing Major Spine Surgery.

Lu Che, Jia-Wen Yu, Yue-Lun Zhang, Li Xu, Yu-Guang Huang
{"title":"Intraoperative Blood Pressure Lability Acts as a Key Mediator in the Impacts of Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy on Postoperative Complications in Patients Undergoing Major Spine Surgery.","authors":"Lu Che, Jia-Wen Yu, Yue-Lun Zhang, Li Xu, Yu-Guang Huang","doi":"10.24920/004202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective Although goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) has been proven to be effective in reducing the incidence of postoperative complications, the underlying mechanisms remain unknown. The aim of this study was to examine the mediating role of intraoperative hemodynamic lability in the association between GDFT and the incidence of postoperative complications. We further tested the role of this mediation effect using mean arterial pressure, a hemodynamic indicator. Methods This secondary analysis used the dataset of a completed nonrandomized controlled study to investigate the effect of GDFT on the incidence of postoperative complications in patients undergoing posterior spine arthrodesis. We used a simple mediation model to test whether there was a mediation effect of average real variability between the association of GDFT and postoperative complications. We conducted mediation analysis using the mediation package in R (version 3.1.2), based on 5,000 bootstrapped samples, adjusting for covariates. Results Among the 300 patients in the study, 40% (120/300) developed postoperative complications within 30 days. GDFT was associated with fewer 30-day postoperative complications after adjustment for confounders (odds ratio: 0.460, 95% <i>CI</i>: 0.278, 0.761; <i>P</i> = 0.003). The total effect of GDFT on postoperative complications was -0.18 (95% <i>CI</i>: -0.28, -0.07; <i>P</i> < 0.01). The average causal mediation effect was -0.08 (95% <i>CI</i>: -0.15, -0.04; <i>P</i> < 0.01). The average direct effect was -0.09 (95% <i>CI</i>: -0.20, 0.03; <i>P</i> = 0.17). The proportion mediated was 49.9% (95% <i>CI</i>: 18.3%, 140.0%). Conclusions The intraoperative blood pressure lability mediates the relationship between GDFT and the incidence of postoperative complications. Future research is needed to clarify whether actively reducing intraoperative blood pressure lability can prevent postoperative complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":10186,"journal":{"name":"Chinese medical sciences journal = Chung-kuo i hsueh k'o hsueh tsa chih","volume":" ","pages":"257-264"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese medical sciences journal = Chung-kuo i hsueh k'o hsueh tsa chih","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24920/004202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective Although goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) has been proven to be effective in reducing the incidence of postoperative complications, the underlying mechanisms remain unknown. The aim of this study was to examine the mediating role of intraoperative hemodynamic lability in the association between GDFT and the incidence of postoperative complications. We further tested the role of this mediation effect using mean arterial pressure, a hemodynamic indicator. Methods This secondary analysis used the dataset of a completed nonrandomized controlled study to investigate the effect of GDFT on the incidence of postoperative complications in patients undergoing posterior spine arthrodesis. We used a simple mediation model to test whether there was a mediation effect of average real variability between the association of GDFT and postoperative complications. We conducted mediation analysis using the mediation package in R (version 3.1.2), based on 5,000 bootstrapped samples, adjusting for covariates. Results Among the 300 patients in the study, 40% (120/300) developed postoperative complications within 30 days. GDFT was associated with fewer 30-day postoperative complications after adjustment for confounders (odds ratio: 0.460, 95% CI: 0.278, 0.761; P = 0.003). The total effect of GDFT on postoperative complications was -0.18 (95% CI: -0.28, -0.07; P < 0.01). The average causal mediation effect was -0.08 (95% CI: -0.15, -0.04; P < 0.01). The average direct effect was -0.09 (95% CI: -0.20, 0.03; P = 0.17). The proportion mediated was 49.9% (95% CI: 18.3%, 140.0%). Conclusions The intraoperative blood pressure lability mediates the relationship between GDFT and the incidence of postoperative complications. Future research is needed to clarify whether actively reducing intraoperative blood pressure lability can prevent postoperative complications.

术中血压不稳定是目标导向液体疗法对脊柱大手术患者术后并发症影响的关键中介。
目的 虽然目标导向液体疗法(GDFT)已被证实能有效降低术后并发症的发生率,但其潜在机制仍不清楚。本研究旨在探讨术中血流动力学不稳定性在 GDFT 与术后并发症发生率之间的中介作用。我们使用血液动力学指标平均动脉压进一步检验了这种中介效应的作用。方法 这项二次分析使用了一项已完成的非随机对照研究的数据集,以研究 GDFT 对脊柱后路关节置换术患者术后并发症发生率的影响。我们使用了一个简单的中介模型来检验平均实际变异性在 GDFT 与术后并发症之间是否存在中介效应。我们使用 R 中的中介包(3.1.2 版)进行了中介分析,基于 5000 个引导样本,并对协变量进行了调整。结果 在参与研究的 300 名患者中,40% 的患者(120/300)在 30 天内出现了术后并发症。在对混杂因素进行调整后,GDFT 与较少的 30 天术后并发症相关(几率比:0.460,95% CI:0.278,0.761;P = 0.003)。GDFT对术后并发症的总影响为-0.18(95% CI:-0.28,-0.07;P < 0.01)。平均因果中介效应为-0.08 (95% CI: -0.15, -0.04; P < 0.01)。平均直接效应为-0.09 (95% CI: -0.20, 0.03; P = 0.17)。介导比例为 49.9% (95% CI: 18.3%, 140.0%)。结论 术中血压不稳定介导了 GDFT 与术后并发症发生率之间的关系。未来的研究需要明确积极降低术中血压不稳定性是否能预防术后并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信