Changes on depression and suicidal ideation under severe lockdown restrictions during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain: a longitudinal study in the general population.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
J L Ayuso-Mateos, D Morillo, J M Haro, B Olaya, E Lara, M Miret
{"title":"Changes on depression and suicidal ideation under severe lockdown restrictions during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain: a longitudinal study in the general population.","authors":"J L Ayuso-Mateos, D Morillo, J M Haro, B Olaya, E Lara, M Miret","doi":"10.1017/S2045796023000677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To assess whether there is a change in the prevalence of depression and suicidal ideation after the strict lockdown measures due to the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain, and to assess which are the factors associated with the incidence of a depressive episode or suicidal ideation during the lockdown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from a longitudinal adult population-based cohort from Madrid and Barcelona were analysed (<i>n</i> = 1103). Face-to-face home-based (pre-pandemic) and telephone interviews were performed. Depression and suicidal ideation were assessed through an adaptation of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI 3.0). Population prevalence estimates and multivariable logistic regressions were computed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prevalence rates of depression changed significantly from before to after the COVID-19 outbreak (from 3.06% to 12.00%; <i>p</i> = 0.01) and per sex and age groups. Individuals reporting COVID-19 concerns (odds ratio [OR] = 3.11; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.45-6.69) and those feeling loneliness (OR = 1.99; 95% CI = 1.52-2.61) during the lockdown were at increased risk of developing depression during the confinement. Resilience showed a protective effect against the risk of depression (OR = 0.57; 95% CI = 0.39-0.83), while individuals perceiving social support during the confinement were at lower risk of developing suicidal thoughts (OR = 0.21; 95% CI = 0.09-0.46). Greater disability during the lockdown was also associated with the risk of suicidal ideation (OR = 2.77; 95% CI = 1.53-5.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Continuous reinforcement of mental health preventive and intervening measures is of global importance, particularly among vulnerable groups who are experiencing the most distress. Future research should strive to evaluate the long-term effects of the COVID-19 crisis on mental health.</p>","PeriodicalId":11787,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","volume":"32 ","pages":"e55"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10539734/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796023000677","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To assess whether there is a change in the prevalence of depression and suicidal ideation after the strict lockdown measures due to the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain, and to assess which are the factors associated with the incidence of a depressive episode or suicidal ideation during the lockdown.

Methods: Data from a longitudinal adult population-based cohort from Madrid and Barcelona were analysed (n = 1103). Face-to-face home-based (pre-pandemic) and telephone interviews were performed. Depression and suicidal ideation were assessed through an adaptation of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI 3.0). Population prevalence estimates and multivariable logistic regressions were computed.

Results: Prevalence rates of depression changed significantly from before to after the COVID-19 outbreak (from 3.06% to 12.00%; p = 0.01) and per sex and age groups. Individuals reporting COVID-19 concerns (odds ratio [OR] = 3.11; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.45-6.69) and those feeling loneliness (OR = 1.99; 95% CI = 1.52-2.61) during the lockdown were at increased risk of developing depression during the confinement. Resilience showed a protective effect against the risk of depression (OR = 0.57; 95% CI = 0.39-0.83), while individuals perceiving social support during the confinement were at lower risk of developing suicidal thoughts (OR = 0.21; 95% CI = 0.09-0.46). Greater disability during the lockdown was also associated with the risk of suicidal ideation (OR = 2.77; 95% CI = 1.53-5.03).

Conclusions: Continuous reinforcement of mental health preventive and intervening measures is of global importance, particularly among vulnerable groups who are experiencing the most distress. Future research should strive to evaluate the long-term effects of the COVID-19 crisis on mental health.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

西班牙第一波新冠肺炎疫情期间,在严格的封锁限制下,抑郁症和自杀念头的变化:一项针对普通人群的纵向研究。
目的:评估在西班牙因第一波新冠肺炎疫情而采取严格封锁措施后,抑郁和自杀念头的患病率是否发生了变化,并评估哪些因素与封锁期间抑郁发作或自杀念头的发生率相关。方法:对来自马德里和巴塞罗那的纵向成年人群队列的数据进行分析(n=1103)。进行了在家面对面(疫情前)和电话采访。抑郁和自杀意念通过国际综合诊断访谈(CIDI3.0)进行评估。计算人群患病率估计值和多变量逻辑回归。结果:新冠肺炎爆发前后,抑郁症患病率发生了显著变化(从3.06%到12.00%;p=0.01),各性别和年龄组的抑郁症患病率也发生了显著差异。报告新冠肺炎担忧的个人(比值比[OR]=3.11;95%置信区间[CI]=1.45-6.69)和那些在封锁期间感到孤独的人(比值比=1.99;95%可信区间=1.52-2.61)在分娩期间患抑郁症的风险增加。复原力显示出对抑郁风险的保护作用(OR=0.57;95%CI=0.39-0.83),而在禁闭期间感受到社会支持的人产生自杀念头的风险较低(OR=0.21;95%CI=0.09-046)。禁闭期间残疾程度越高也与自杀意念的风险相关(OR=2.77;95%CI=1.53-5.03)。结论:持续加强心理健康预防和干预措施具有全球意义重要性,尤其是在经历最痛苦的弱势群体中。未来的研究应努力评估新冠肺炎危机对心理健康的长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
1.20%
发文量
121
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences is a prestigious international, peer-reviewed journal that has been publishing in Open Access format since 2020. Formerly known as Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale and established in 1992 by Michele Tansella, the journal prioritizes highly relevant and innovative research articles and systematic reviews in the areas of public mental health and policy, mental health services and system research, as well as epidemiological and social psychiatry. Join us in advancing knowledge and understanding in these critical fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信