Resistance Training in Post-COVID Recovery: Rationale and Current Evidence.

George Mills, Enya Daynes, Hamish J C McAuley, Neil J Greening, Samuel Briggs-Price, Molly M Baldwin, Sally J Singh
{"title":"Resistance Training in Post-COVID Recovery: Rationale and Current Evidence.","authors":"George Mills,&nbsp;Enya Daynes,&nbsp;Hamish J C McAuley,&nbsp;Neil J Greening,&nbsp;Samuel Briggs-Price,&nbsp;Molly M Baldwin,&nbsp;Sally J Singh","doi":"10.22540/JFSF-08-188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During hospitalisation with COVID-19, individuals may experience prolonged periods of immobilisation. Combined with the inflammatory effects of the virus, this may lead to a significant reduction in both muscle mass and strength. Data from several long-term studies suggest that these symptoms may not fully resolve within one year. Owing to its effectiveness at inducing muscle fibre hypertrophy and improving neuromuscular efficiency, resistance training is of great interest in the rehabilitation of this population. This narrative review aims to identify the rationale and potential efficacy of resistance training for restoring physical function following infection with SARS-CoV-2, as well as evidence of its use in clinical practice. The studies included in this narrative review consisted mostly of multi-component rehabilitation trials. Of these, widespread improvements in muscle strength were reported using intensities of up to 80% of participants' 1-repetition-maximum. Evidence thus far indicates that resistance training may be safe and effective in patients following COVID-19, although its individual contribution is difficult to discern. Future exercise intervention studies investigating the efficacy of resistance training as a sole modality are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":73754,"journal":{"name":"Journal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls","volume":"8 3","pages":"188-194"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e7/b7/JFSF-8-188.PMC10472035.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22540/JFSF-08-188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During hospitalisation with COVID-19, individuals may experience prolonged periods of immobilisation. Combined with the inflammatory effects of the virus, this may lead to a significant reduction in both muscle mass and strength. Data from several long-term studies suggest that these symptoms may not fully resolve within one year. Owing to its effectiveness at inducing muscle fibre hypertrophy and improving neuromuscular efficiency, resistance training is of great interest in the rehabilitation of this population. This narrative review aims to identify the rationale and potential efficacy of resistance training for restoring physical function following infection with SARS-CoV-2, as well as evidence of its use in clinical practice. The studies included in this narrative review consisted mostly of multi-component rehabilitation trials. Of these, widespread improvements in muscle strength were reported using intensities of up to 80% of participants' 1-repetition-maximum. Evidence thus far indicates that resistance training may be safe and effective in patients following COVID-19, although its individual contribution is difficult to discern. Future exercise intervention studies investigating the efficacy of resistance training as a sole modality are needed.

Abstract Image

抗阻训练在covid - 19后恢复:基本原理和当前证据。
在因COVID-19住院期间,个人可能会经历长时间的固定。再加上病毒的炎症作用,这可能导致肌肉质量和力量的显著减少。几项长期研究的数据表明,这些症状可能不会在一年内完全消失。由于其在诱导肌纤维肥大和提高神经肌肉效率方面的有效性,阻力训练在这一人群的康复中具有很大的兴趣。这篇叙述性综述旨在确定抵抗训练在感染SARS-CoV-2后恢复身体功能的基本原理和潜在功效,以及其在临床实践中的应用证据。这篇叙述性综述的研究主要包括多成分康复试验。其中,肌肉力量的广泛改善被报道使用高达参与者1次重复最大值的80%的强度。迄今为止的证据表明,阻力训练对COVID-19患者可能是安全有效的,尽管其个人贡献难以辨别。未来的运动干预研究需要调查阻力训练作为唯一方式的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信