Parenting in the Context of the Child: Genetic and Social Processes.

IF 9.4 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
David Reiss, Jody M Ganiban, Leslie D Leve, Jenae M Neiderhiser, Daniel S Shaw, Misaki N Natsuaki
{"title":"Parenting in the Context of the Child: Genetic and Social Processes.","authors":"David Reiss,&nbsp;Jody M Ganiban,&nbsp;Leslie D Leve,&nbsp;Jenae M Neiderhiser,&nbsp;Daniel S Shaw,&nbsp;Misaki N Natsuaki","doi":"10.1111/mono.12460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The focus on the role of parenting in child development has a long-standing history. When measures of parenting precede changes in child development, researchers typically infer a causal role of parenting practices and attitudes on child development. However, this research is usually conducted with parents raising their own biological offspring. Such research designs cannot account for the effects of genes that are common to parents and children, nor for genetically influenced traits in children that influence how they are parented and how parenting affects them. The aim of this monograph is to provide a clearer view of parenting by synthesizing findings from the Early Growth and Development Study (EGDS). EGDS is a longitudinal study of adopted children, their birth parents, and their rearing parents studied across infancy and childhood. Families (N = 561) were recruited in the United States through adoption agencies between 2000 and 2010. Data collection began when adoptees were 9 months old (males = 57.2%; White 54.5%, Black 13.2%, Hispanic/Latinx 13.4%, Multiracial 17.8%, other 1.1%). The median child age at adoption placement was 2 days (M = 5.58, SD = 11.32). Adoptive parents were predominantly in their 30s, White, and coming from upper-middle- or upper-class backgrounds with high educational attainment (a mode at 4-year college or graduate degree). Most adoptive parents were heterosexual couples, and were married at the beginning of the project. The birth parent sample was more racially and ethnically diverse, but the majority (70%) were White. At the beginning of the study, most birth mothers and fathers were in their 20s, with a mode of educational attainment at high school degree, and few of them were married. We have been following these family members over time, assessing their genetic influences, prenatal environment, rearing environment, and child development. Controlling for effects of genes common to parents and children, we confirmed some previously reported associations between parenting, parent psychopathology, and marital adjustment in relation to child problematic and prosocial behavior. We also observed effects of children's heritable characteristics, characteristics thought to be transmitted from parent to child by genetic means, on their parents and how those effects contributed to subsequent child development. For example, we found that genetically influenced child impulsivity and social withdrawal both elicited harsh parenting, whereas a genetically influenced sunny disposition elicited parental warmth. We found numerous instances of children's genetically influenced characteristics that enhanced positive parental influences on child development or that protected them from harsh parenting. Integrating our findings, we propose a new, genetically informed process model of parenting. We posit that parents implicitly or explicitly detect genetically influenced liabilities and assets in their children. We also suggest future research into factors such as marital adjustment, that favor parents responding with appropriate protection or enhancement. Our findings illustrate a productive use of genetic information in prevention research: helping parents respond effectively to a profile of child strengths and challenges rather than using genetic information simply to identify some children unresponsive to current preventive interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":55972,"journal":{"name":"Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development","volume":"87 1-3","pages":"7-188"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10329459/pdf/nihms-1868747.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/mono.12460","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The focus on the role of parenting in child development has a long-standing history. When measures of parenting precede changes in child development, researchers typically infer a causal role of parenting practices and attitudes on child development. However, this research is usually conducted with parents raising their own biological offspring. Such research designs cannot account for the effects of genes that are common to parents and children, nor for genetically influenced traits in children that influence how they are parented and how parenting affects them. The aim of this monograph is to provide a clearer view of parenting by synthesizing findings from the Early Growth and Development Study (EGDS). EGDS is a longitudinal study of adopted children, their birth parents, and their rearing parents studied across infancy and childhood. Families (N = 561) were recruited in the United States through adoption agencies between 2000 and 2010. Data collection began when adoptees were 9 months old (males = 57.2%; White 54.5%, Black 13.2%, Hispanic/Latinx 13.4%, Multiracial 17.8%, other 1.1%). The median child age at adoption placement was 2 days (M = 5.58, SD = 11.32). Adoptive parents were predominantly in their 30s, White, and coming from upper-middle- or upper-class backgrounds with high educational attainment (a mode at 4-year college or graduate degree). Most adoptive parents were heterosexual couples, and were married at the beginning of the project. The birth parent sample was more racially and ethnically diverse, but the majority (70%) were White. At the beginning of the study, most birth mothers and fathers were in their 20s, with a mode of educational attainment at high school degree, and few of them were married. We have been following these family members over time, assessing their genetic influences, prenatal environment, rearing environment, and child development. Controlling for effects of genes common to parents and children, we confirmed some previously reported associations between parenting, parent psychopathology, and marital adjustment in relation to child problematic and prosocial behavior. We also observed effects of children's heritable characteristics, characteristics thought to be transmitted from parent to child by genetic means, on their parents and how those effects contributed to subsequent child development. For example, we found that genetically influenced child impulsivity and social withdrawal both elicited harsh parenting, whereas a genetically influenced sunny disposition elicited parental warmth. We found numerous instances of children's genetically influenced characteristics that enhanced positive parental influences on child development or that protected them from harsh parenting. Integrating our findings, we propose a new, genetically informed process model of parenting. We posit that parents implicitly or explicitly detect genetically influenced liabilities and assets in their children. We also suggest future research into factors such as marital adjustment, that favor parents responding with appropriate protection or enhancement. Our findings illustrate a productive use of genetic information in prevention research: helping parents respond effectively to a profile of child strengths and challenges rather than using genetic information simply to identify some children unresponsive to current preventive interventions.

Abstract Image

儿童背景下的育儿:遗传和社会过程。
对养育子女在儿童发展中的作用的关注由来已久。当育儿措施先于儿童发展的变化时,研究人员通常会推断出育儿实践和态度对儿童发展的因果作用。然而,这项研究通常是在父母养育自己的亲生子女的情况下进行的。这样的研究设计无法解释父母和孩子共同的基因的影响,也无法解释儿童受基因影响的特征,这些特征会影响他们的父母身份以及养育子女对他们的影响。本专著的目的是通过综合早期生长发育研究(EGDS)的发现,提供更清晰的育儿观。EGDS是一项针对领养儿童、其亲生父母和养育父母的纵向研究,研究对象为婴儿期和儿童期。族(N = 561)在2000年至2010年间通过收养机构在美国招募。数据收集始于被收养者9个月大时(男性 = 57.2%;白人54.5%,黑人13.2%,西班牙裔/拉丁裔13.4%,多种族17.8%,其他1.1%) = 5.58,标准差 = 11.32)。养父母主要是30多岁的白人,来自中上层或上层社会,具有较高的教育程度(四年制大学或研究生学历)。大多数养父母都是异性恋夫妇,在项目开始时就结婚了。亲生父母的样本在种族和族裔上更加多样化,但大多数(70%)是白人。在研究开始时,大多数生母和生父都在20多岁,具有高中学历,很少有人结婚。随着时间的推移,我们一直在跟踪这些家庭成员,评估他们的基因影响、产前环境、养育环境和儿童发育。为了控制父母和孩子共同基因的影响,我们证实了一些先前报道的父母养育、父母精神病理学和婚姻调整与孩子问题和亲社会行为之间的关联。我们还观察了儿童的可遗传特征,即被认为通过遗传手段在父母之间传播的特征,对其父母的影响,以及这些影响如何促进随后的儿童发展。例如,我们发现,受基因影响的孩子冲动和社交退缩都会引发严厉的育儿,而受基因影响阳光的性格会引发父母的温暖。我们发现了许多儿童受基因影响的特征,这些特征增强了父母对儿童发展的积极影响,或保护他们免受严厉的养育。结合我们的发现,我们提出了一种新的、基于基因的育儿过程模型。我们假设父母在孩子身上隐含或明确地发现了受基因影响的负债和资产。我们还建议未来对婚姻调整等因素进行研究,这些因素有利于父母采取适当的保护或加强措施。我们的研究结果说明了基因信息在预防研究中的有效利用:帮助父母有效应对儿童的优势和挑战,而不是仅仅利用基因信息来识别一些对当前预防干预措施没有反应的儿童。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Since 1935, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development has been a platform for presenting in-depth research studies and significant findings in child development and related disciplines. Each issue features a single study or a collection of papers on a unified theme, often complemented by commentary and discussion. In alignment with all Society for Research in Child Development (SRCD) publications, the Monographs facilitate the exchange of data, techniques, research methods, and conclusions among development specialists across diverse disciplines. Subscribing to the Monographs series also includes a full subscription (6 issues) to Child Development, the flagship journal of the SRCD, and Child Development Perspectives, the newest journal from the SRCD.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信