Calibration of an Accelerometer Activity Index among Older Women and Its Association with Cardiometabolic Risk Factors.

Guangxing Wang, Sixuan Wu, Kelly R Evenson, Ilsuk Kang, Michael J LaMonte, John Bellettiere, I-Min Lee, Annie Green Howard, Andrea Z LaCroix, Chongzhi Di
{"title":"Calibration of an Accelerometer Activity Index among Older Women and Its Association with Cardiometabolic Risk Factors.","authors":"Guangxing Wang,&nbsp;Sixuan Wu,&nbsp;Kelly R Evenson,&nbsp;Ilsuk Kang,&nbsp;Michael J LaMonte,&nbsp;John Bellettiere,&nbsp;I-Min Lee,&nbsp;Annie Green Howard,&nbsp;Andrea Z LaCroix,&nbsp;Chongzhi Di","doi":"10.1123/jmpb.2021-0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Traditional summary metrics provided by accelerometer device manufacturers, known as counts, are proprietary and manufacturer specific, making them difficult to compare studies using different devices. Alternative summary metrics based on raw accelerometry data have been introduced in recent years. However, they were often not calibrated on ground truth measures of activity-related energy expenditure for direct translation into continuous activity intensity levels. Our purpose is to calibrate, derive, and validate thresholds among women 60 years and older based on a recently proposed transparent raw data based accelerometer activity index (AAI), and to demonstrate its application in association with cardiometabolic risk factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We first built calibration equations for estimating metabolic equivalents (METs) continuously using AAI and personal characteristics using internal calibration data (n=199). We then derived AAI cutpoints to classify epochs into sedentary behavior and intensity categories. The AAI cutpoints were applied to 4,655 data units in the main study. We then utilized linear models to investigate associations of AAI sedentary behavior and physical activity intensity with cardiometabolic risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that AAI demonstrated great predictive accuracy for METs (R<sup>2</sup>=0.74). AAI-based physical activity measures were associated in the expected directions with body mass index (BMI), blood glucose, and high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The calibration framework for AAI and the cutpoints derived for women older than 60 years can be applied to ongoing epidemiologic studies to more accurately define sedentary behavior and physical activity intensity exposures which could improve accuracy of estimated associations with health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":73572,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the measurement of physical behaviour","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9733915/pdf/nihms-1820509.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for the measurement of physical behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jmpb.2021-0031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: Traditional summary metrics provided by accelerometer device manufacturers, known as counts, are proprietary and manufacturer specific, making them difficult to compare studies using different devices. Alternative summary metrics based on raw accelerometry data have been introduced in recent years. However, they were often not calibrated on ground truth measures of activity-related energy expenditure for direct translation into continuous activity intensity levels. Our purpose is to calibrate, derive, and validate thresholds among women 60 years and older based on a recently proposed transparent raw data based accelerometer activity index (AAI), and to demonstrate its application in association with cardiometabolic risk factors.

Methods: We first built calibration equations for estimating metabolic equivalents (METs) continuously using AAI and personal characteristics using internal calibration data (n=199). We then derived AAI cutpoints to classify epochs into sedentary behavior and intensity categories. The AAI cutpoints were applied to 4,655 data units in the main study. We then utilized linear models to investigate associations of AAI sedentary behavior and physical activity intensity with cardiometabolic risk factors.

Results: We found that AAI demonstrated great predictive accuracy for METs (R2=0.74). AAI-based physical activity measures were associated in the expected directions with body mass index (BMI), blood glucose, and high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol.

Conclusion: The calibration framework for AAI and the cutpoints derived for women older than 60 years can be applied to ongoing epidemiologic studies to more accurately define sedentary behavior and physical activity intensity exposures which could improve accuracy of estimated associations with health outcomes.

老年妇女加速度计活动指数的校准及其与心脏代谢危险因素的关系。
目的:加速度计设备制造商提供的传统汇总指标,称为计数,是专有的和特定于制造商的,因此难以比较使用不同设备的研究。近年来引入了基于原始加速度测量数据的替代汇总度量。然而,它们往往没有根据与活动有关的能量消耗的实地真实测量进行校准,以便直接转化为持续的活动强度水平。我们的目的是基于最近提出的透明原始数据加速计活动指数(AAI)来校准、推导和验证60岁及以上女性的阈值,并证明其与心脏代谢危险因素相关的应用。方法:我们首先利用AAI和利用内部校准数据(n=199)的个人特征建立了连续估计代谢当量(METs)的校准方程。然后,我们推导出AAI切点,将时间划分为久坐行为和强度类别。在主要研究中,AAI切点应用于4,655个数据单元。然后,我们利用线性模型来调查AAI久坐行为和身体活动强度与心脏代谢危险因素的关系。结果:我们发现AAI对METs具有很高的预测准确性(R2=0.74)。基于aai的体力活动测量与体重指数(BMI)、血糖和高密度脂蛋白(HDL)胆固醇呈预期方向相关。结论:AAI的校准框架和60岁以上女性的切点可以应用于正在进行的流行病学研究,以更准确地定义久坐行为和身体活动强度暴露,从而提高与健康结果估计关联的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信