Proxy-report in individuals with intellectual disability: A scoping review.

Stephanie L Santoro, Karen Donelan, Melissa Constantine
{"title":"Proxy-report in individuals with intellectual disability: A scoping review.","authors":"Stephanie L Santoro,&nbsp;Karen Donelan,&nbsp;Melissa Constantine","doi":"10.1111/jar.13013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Views can be collected from individuals (self-report) or others on their behalf (proxy-report).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to review the literature on methods and statistical approaches used to evaluate observer versus self-report responses from individuals with intellectual disability or Down syndrome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A series of key questions related to statistical approaches and data collection methods were formulated a priori to inform the search strategy and review process. These addressed the topics of self-report in individuals with intellectual disability, including Down syndrome. Using the National Library of Medicine database, PubMed, detailed literature searches were performed. The quality of available evidence was then evaluated, the existing literature was summarised, and knowledge gaps and research needs were identified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty relevant original articles were identified which addressed at least one key question. Study details, including: research design, internal validity, external validity, and relevant results are presented. Review of studies of individuals with intellectual disability which used a variety of statistical approaches showed mixed agreement between self-report and proxy-report.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Few studies identified to-date have used self-report from individuals with Down syndrome, but lessons from the existing intellectual disability literature can guide researchers to incorporate self-report from individuals with Down syndrome in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":73610,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID","volume":"35 5","pages":"1088-1108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9378492/pdf/nihms-1810992.pdf","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.13013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Background: Views can be collected from individuals (self-report) or others on their behalf (proxy-report).

Objective: We aimed to review the literature on methods and statistical approaches used to evaluate observer versus self-report responses from individuals with intellectual disability or Down syndrome.

Methods: A series of key questions related to statistical approaches and data collection methods were formulated a priori to inform the search strategy and review process. These addressed the topics of self-report in individuals with intellectual disability, including Down syndrome. Using the National Library of Medicine database, PubMed, detailed literature searches were performed. The quality of available evidence was then evaluated, the existing literature was summarised, and knowledge gaps and research needs were identified.

Results: Fifty relevant original articles were identified which addressed at least one key question. Study details, including: research design, internal validity, external validity, and relevant results are presented. Review of studies of individuals with intellectual disability which used a variety of statistical approaches showed mixed agreement between self-report and proxy-report.

Conclusion: Few studies identified to-date have used self-report from individuals with Down syndrome, but lessons from the existing intellectual disability literature can guide researchers to incorporate self-report from individuals with Down syndrome in the future.

智力残疾患者的代理报告:范围综述。
背景:观点可以从个人(自我报告)或其他人(代理报告)收集。目的:我们旨在回顾用于评估智力残疾或唐氏综合征患者的观察者与自我报告反应的方法和统计方法的文献。方法:先验地制定一系列与统计方法和数据收集方法相关的关键问题,为搜索策略和审查过程提供信息。这些讨论了包括唐氏综合症在内的智力残疾个体的自我报告主题。使用国家医学图书馆数据库PubMed,进行了详细的文献检索。然后评估现有证据的质量,总结现有文献,确定知识差距和研究需求。结果:50篇相关的原创文章被确定,它们至少解决了一个关键问题。研究细节包括:研究设计、内部效度、外部效度,并给出相关结果。对使用各种统计方法的智力残疾个体研究的回顾显示,自我报告和代理报告之间的一致性不一。结论:迄今为止,很少有研究使用唐氏综合征患者的自我报告,但从现有的智力残疾文献中吸取的教训可以指导研究人员在未来将唐氏综合征患者的自我报告纳入研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信