Mechanical Characteristics of Composite Resins Produced by Additive and Subtractive Manufacturing.

IF 1.1 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Z Sahin, N E Ozer, C Yιkιcι, M A Kιlιçarslan
{"title":"Mechanical Characteristics of Composite Resins Produced by Additive and Subtractive Manufacturing.","authors":"Z Sahin, N E Ozer, C Yιkιcι, M A Kιlιçarslan","doi":"10.1922/EJPRD_2478Sahin08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION The aim of the study was to evaluate the mechanical characteristics of resin composites produced by additive and subtractive manufacturing. METHODS Six composite resin materials produced by subtractive (Vita Enamic-VE, Cerasmart-CE, Lava Ultimate-LU) and additive manufacturing (Varseo Smile Crown plus-VSC, Saremco Print Crowntec-SPC, Formlabs 3B Permanent crown-FLP) were selected. The three-point bending test was performed, and surface hardness of test specimens was measured. RESULTS The flexural strength values of CE, SPC and LU test groups were found to be statistically higher when compared to VE, FLP and VSC test groups (p⟨0.0033). The modulus of elasticity values of the test specimens was listed as VE>LU>CE>SPC>FLP>VSC. The FLP group [35.11(4.46)] had the lowest surface hardness values, whereas the VE group [252.50 (21.5)] had the highest values. Other groups were listed as LU⟩CE⟩SPC⟩VSC in terms of surface hardness. CONCLUSIONS According to the ISO 6872:2015, the flexural strengths of all resin composites were found to be acceptable for single unit fixed restorations. However, the VSC group's flexural strength is suitable for inlay, onlay, veneer restorations or single-unit anterior fixed dental prostheses. Also, VSC may not be a suitable choice for posterior restorations due to its low flexural strength.","PeriodicalId":45686,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2478Sahin08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

INTRODUCTION The aim of the study was to evaluate the mechanical characteristics of resin composites produced by additive and subtractive manufacturing. METHODS Six composite resin materials produced by subtractive (Vita Enamic-VE, Cerasmart-CE, Lava Ultimate-LU) and additive manufacturing (Varseo Smile Crown plus-VSC, Saremco Print Crowntec-SPC, Formlabs 3B Permanent crown-FLP) were selected. The three-point bending test was performed, and surface hardness of test specimens was measured. RESULTS The flexural strength values of CE, SPC and LU test groups were found to be statistically higher when compared to VE, FLP and VSC test groups (p⟨0.0033). The modulus of elasticity values of the test specimens was listed as VE>LU>CE>SPC>FLP>VSC. The FLP group [35.11(4.46)] had the lowest surface hardness values, whereas the VE group [252.50 (21.5)] had the highest values. Other groups were listed as LU⟩CE⟩SPC⟩VSC in terms of surface hardness. CONCLUSIONS According to the ISO 6872:2015, the flexural strengths of all resin composites were found to be acceptable for single unit fixed restorations. However, the VSC group's flexural strength is suitable for inlay, onlay, veneer restorations or single-unit anterior fixed dental prostheses. Also, VSC may not be a suitable choice for posterior restorations due to its low flexural strength.
增减法复合树脂的力学特性研究。
前言:本研究的目的是评价增材制造和减法制造的树脂复合材料的力学特性。方法:选择减法(Vita Enamic-VE、Cerasmart-CE、Lava Ultimate-LU)和增材制造(Varseo Smile Crown plus-VSC、Saremco Print Crown - spc、Formlabs 3B Permanent Crown - flp)生产的6种复合树脂材料。进行三点弯曲试验,并测量试样的表面硬度。结果:CE、SPC、LU试验组的抗弯强度值均高于VE、FLP、VSC试验组(p⟨0.0033)。试件的弹性模量大小为VE>LU>CE>SPC>FLP>VSC。FLP组表面硬度值最低[35.11(4.46)],VE组表面硬度值最高[252.50(21.5)]。其他组在表面硬度方面被列为LU⟩CE⟩SPC⟩VSC。结论:根据ISO 6872:2015,所有树脂复合材料的抗弯强度均可用于单个固定修复体。然而,VSC组的抗弯强度适用于嵌体、嵌体、贴面修复或单单元前牙固定修复体。此外,由于VSC的屈曲强度低,它可能不适合用于后路修复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry is published quarterly and includes clinical and research articles in subjects such as prosthodontics, operative dentistry, implantology, endodontics, periodontics and dental materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信