When Objective Ambivalence Predicts Subjective Ambivalence: An Affect-Cognition Matching Perspective.

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Wei Jie Reiner Ng, Ya Hui Michelle See, Laura E Wallace
{"title":"When Objective Ambivalence Predicts Subjective Ambivalence: An Affect-Cognition Matching Perspective.","authors":"Wei Jie Reiner Ng,&nbsp;Ya Hui Michelle See,&nbsp;Laura E Wallace","doi":"10.1177/01461672221102015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding when people are likely to feel ambivalent is important, as ambivalence is associated with key attitude outcomes, such as attitude-behavior consistency. Interestingly, the presence of conflicting positive and negative reactions (objective ambivalence) is weakly related to feeling conflicted (subjective ambivalence). We tested a novel situation that can influence the correspondence between objective and subjective ambivalence: whether a message and a recipient's topic match in affective versus cognitive orientation. When a person encounters a message with an affective or cognitive match to the topic, conflicting reactions may be more accessible, increasing feelings of ambivalence. Across five studies, greater objective-subjective ambivalence correspondence occurred with an affective-cognitive match between message and topic orientation. Studies 4 and 5 also demonstrated that this primarily occurred when the message was counterattitudinal. This work contributes to the literature explaining the gap between measures of objective and subjective ambivalence as well as how messages can influence attitude strength properties.</p>","PeriodicalId":19834,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","volume":"49 10","pages":"1495-1510"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672221102015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Understanding when people are likely to feel ambivalent is important, as ambivalence is associated with key attitude outcomes, such as attitude-behavior consistency. Interestingly, the presence of conflicting positive and negative reactions (objective ambivalence) is weakly related to feeling conflicted (subjective ambivalence). We tested a novel situation that can influence the correspondence between objective and subjective ambivalence: whether a message and a recipient's topic match in affective versus cognitive orientation. When a person encounters a message with an affective or cognitive match to the topic, conflicting reactions may be more accessible, increasing feelings of ambivalence. Across five studies, greater objective-subjective ambivalence correspondence occurred with an affective-cognitive match between message and topic orientation. Studies 4 and 5 also demonstrated that this primarily occurred when the message was counterattitudinal. This work contributes to the literature explaining the gap between measures of objective and subjective ambivalence as well as how messages can influence attitude strength properties.

当客观歧义预测主观歧义时:情感-认知匹配视角。
了解人们何时可能感到矛盾很重要,因为矛盾与关键的态度结果有关,例如态度-行为的一致性。有趣的是,存在冲突的积极和消极反应(客观矛盾心理)与感到冲突(主观矛盾心理)的关系较弱。我们测试了一种可以影响客观矛盾心理和主观矛盾心理之间对应关系的新情况:信息和接收者的主题在情感取向和认知取向上是否匹配。当一个人遇到与主题情感或认知匹配的信息时,冲突的反应可能更容易获得,从而增加矛盾情绪。在五项研究中,信息和主题定向之间的情感认知匹配产生了更大的客观-主观矛盾对应关系。研究4和5还表明,这主要发生在信息是反态度的时候。这项工作有助于文献解释客观和主观矛盾心理测量之间的差距,以及信息如何影响态度强度属性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: The Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin is the official journal for the Society of Personality and Social Psychology. The journal is an international outlet for original empirical papers in all areas of personality and social psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信