Peer Review Questions & Answers: How?

IF 0.9 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Laura Meyer-Junco, Julie M Waldfogel, Nakia Duncan
{"title":"Peer Review Questions & Answers: How?","authors":"Laura Meyer-Junco, Julie M Waldfogel, Nakia Duncan","doi":"10.1080/15360288.2023.2245738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Peer review is a collaborative process among reviewers and the journal editor to assess the validity and significance of submitted manuscripts. Constructive comments from peer reviewers improve the scientific writing of authors and ultimately readers’ confidence in the integrity of the published article (1, 2). To support the growth of peer reviewers, the Journal of Pain and Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy (JPPCP) has created a Peer Review Q&A editorial series to serve as a comprehensive guide to the peer review process (3). In this installment How? Part II, we will focus on the peer review process for particular article types: case reports, systematic reviews, narrative reviews, and opinion pieces. For general tips on thinking like a peer reviewer and reviewing research articles specifically, check out the How? Part I editorial published in the Quarter 2 issue of 2023 (4).","PeriodicalId":16645,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15360288.2023.2245738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Peer review is a collaborative process among reviewers and the journal editor to assess the validity and significance of submitted manuscripts. Constructive comments from peer reviewers improve the scientific writing of authors and ultimately readers’ confidence in the integrity of the published article (1, 2). To support the growth of peer reviewers, the Journal of Pain and Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy (JPPCP) has created a Peer Review Q&A editorial series to serve as a comprehensive guide to the peer review process (3). In this installment How? Part II, we will focus on the peer review process for particular article types: case reports, systematic reviews, narrative reviews, and opinion pieces. For general tips on thinking like a peer reviewer and reviewing research articles specifically, check out the How? Part I editorial published in the Quarter 2 issue of 2023 (4).
同行评议问答:怎么做?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信