Clinical Practices Surrounding the Prescription of Home Oxygen in Patients With COPD and Desaturation.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Sandra E Zaeh, Meredith Case, David H Au, Michele DaSilva, Karen Deitemeyer, Julie DeLisa, Laura C Feemster, Lynn B Gerald, Jerry A Krishnan, Jennifer Sculley, Annette Woodruff, Michelle N Eakin
{"title":"Clinical Practices Surrounding the Prescription of Home Oxygen in Patients With COPD and Desaturation.","authors":"Sandra E Zaeh, Meredith Case, David H Au, Michele DaSilva, Karen Deitemeyer, Julie DeLisa, Laura C Feemster, Lynn B Gerald, Jerry A Krishnan, Jennifer Sculley, Annette Woodruff, Michelle N Eakin","doi":"10.15326/jcopdf.2023.0402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>While home oxygen therapy increases survival in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who have severe resting hypoxemia, recent evidence suggests that there is no survival benefit of home oxygen for patients with COPD who have isolated exertional desaturation. We aimed to understand clinician practice patterns surrounding the prescription of home oxygen for patients with COPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews via videoconference with 15 physicians and 3 nurse practitioners who provide care for patients with COPD. Clinicians were recruited through the American Lung Association Airways Clinical Research Centers. Interview guides were created with the assistance of patient investigators and included questions regarding clinician practices surrounding the prescription of oxygen for patients with COPD and the use of clinical guidelines. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded for themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 18 clinician interviewees, one-third were women, with most participants (n=11) being < 50 years old. Results of the semi-structured interviews suggested research evidence, clinical experience, and patient preferences contributed to clinician decision-making. Most clinicians described a shared decision-making process for prescribing home oxygen for patients, including discussion of risks and benefits, and developing an understanding of patient values and preferences. Clinicians did not use a structured tool to conduct these conversations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinicians consider a number of patient and clinical factors when prescribing home oxygen therapy, often using a shared decision-making process. Tools to support shared decision-making about the use of home oxygen are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10699490/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15326/jcopdf.2023.0402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: While home oxygen therapy increases survival in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who have severe resting hypoxemia, recent evidence suggests that there is no survival benefit of home oxygen for patients with COPD who have isolated exertional desaturation. We aimed to understand clinician practice patterns surrounding the prescription of home oxygen for patients with COPD.

Methods: We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews via videoconference with 15 physicians and 3 nurse practitioners who provide care for patients with COPD. Clinicians were recruited through the American Lung Association Airways Clinical Research Centers. Interview guides were created with the assistance of patient investigators and included questions regarding clinician practices surrounding the prescription of oxygen for patients with COPD and the use of clinical guidelines. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded for themes.

Results: Of the 18 clinician interviewees, one-third were women, with most participants (n=11) being < 50 years old. Results of the semi-structured interviews suggested research evidence, clinical experience, and patient preferences contributed to clinician decision-making. Most clinicians described a shared decision-making process for prescribing home oxygen for patients, including discussion of risks and benefits, and developing an understanding of patient values and preferences. Clinicians did not use a structured tool to conduct these conversations.

Conclusions: Clinicians consider a number of patient and clinical factors when prescribing home oxygen therapy, often using a shared decision-making process. Tools to support shared decision-making about the use of home oxygen are needed.

慢性阻塞性肺病和去饱和度患者家庭氧气处方的临床实践。
目的:虽然家庭氧气治疗提高了患有严重静息低氧血症的慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)患者的生存率,但最近的证据表明,对于患有孤立性运动性去饱和的COPD患者,家庭氧气没有生存益处。我们旨在了解临床医生为COPD患者开具家庭氧气处方的实践模式。方法:我们通过视频会议对15名为COPD患者提供护理的医生和3名执业护士进行了半结构化的定性访谈。临床医生是通过美国肺脏协会航空公司临床研究中心招募的。访谈指南是在患者调查人员的协助下创建的,其中包括有关COPD患者氧气处方和临床指南使用的临床医生实践问题。访谈被记录、转录并按主题编码。结果:在18名临床医生受访者中,三分之一是女性,大多数参与者(n=11)年龄在50岁以下。半结构化访谈的结果表明,研究证据、临床经验和患者偏好有助于临床医生的决策。大多数临床医生描述了为患者开具家庭氧气处方的共同决策过程,包括对风险和益处的讨论,以及对患者价值观和偏好的理解。临床医生没有使用结构化的工具来进行这些对话。结论:临床医生在开家庭氧气治疗处方时考虑了许多患者和临床因素,通常使用共同的决策过程。需要支持关于家庭氧气使用的共同决策的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信