Michael J Fitzgerald, James R Mullen, Mikael J Starecki, Andrew Greenberg, David V Tuckman
{"title":"Single Incision Modified Tension Slide Technique in Distal Biceps Repair: Improved Load to Failure While Reducing Surgical Pitfalls.","authors":"Michael J Fitzgerald, James R Mullen, Mikael J Starecki, Andrew Greenberg, David V Tuckman","doi":"10.1097/BTH.0000000000000376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Historically, distal biceps tendon repair through the tension slide technique (TST) using a cortical button has yielded the strongest published repair measured by observed gap formation in both cyclic and maximal load to failure. The modified tension slide technique (MTST) was developed in order to provide the surgeon with a technically simpler and biomechanically more effective way to reduce gap formation and consistently seat/bottom-out the tendon within the bone tunnel through a more direct line of pull. In order to compare the biomechanics of the MTST to the TST, we used 24 matched bovine extensor tendons, and conducted maximal load to failure and cyclical load to failure testing using an Instron 5566 machine. The mean maximal load to failure for the MTST was 444 N versus 229 N for the TST ( P <0.004) while no gap formation was observed in either group after cyclic load testing. These findings indicate that the MTST has a statistically significant increased load to gap formation of ∼2-fold in comparison to TST. In the MTST both limbs of suture are passed back through the tendon, before button implantation, eliminating the \"operating in a hole\" effect required in the TST, and making for a simpler surgical procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":39303,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery","volume":"26 3","pages":"152-156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques in Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BTH.0000000000000376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Historically, distal biceps tendon repair through the tension slide technique (TST) using a cortical button has yielded the strongest published repair measured by observed gap formation in both cyclic and maximal load to failure. The modified tension slide technique (MTST) was developed in order to provide the surgeon with a technically simpler and biomechanically more effective way to reduce gap formation and consistently seat/bottom-out the tendon within the bone tunnel through a more direct line of pull. In order to compare the biomechanics of the MTST to the TST, we used 24 matched bovine extensor tendons, and conducted maximal load to failure and cyclical load to failure testing using an Instron 5566 machine. The mean maximal load to failure for the MTST was 444 N versus 229 N for the TST ( P <0.004) while no gap formation was observed in either group after cyclic load testing. These findings indicate that the MTST has a statistically significant increased load to gap formation of ∼2-fold in comparison to TST. In the MTST both limbs of suture are passed back through the tendon, before button implantation, eliminating the "operating in a hole" effect required in the TST, and making for a simpler surgical procedure.
从历史上看,使用皮质按钮通过张力滑动技术(TST)修复二头肌远端肌腱,在循环和最大负荷失效时观察间隙形成,产生了已发表的最强修复。改良张力滑动技术(MTST)的发展是为了给外科医生提供一种技术上更简单,生物力学上更有效的方法来减少间隙的形成,并通过更直接的牵拉线在骨隧道内一致地定位/触底肌腱。为了比较MTST和TST的生物力学,我们使用了24根匹配的牛伸肌腱,并使用Instron 5566机器进行了最大载荷到失效和循环载荷到失效测试。MTST到失效的平均最大负荷为444 N,而TST为229 N (P
期刊介绍:
Techniques in Hand & Upper Extremity Surgery presents authoritative, practical information on today"s advances in hand and upper extremity surgery. It features articles by leading experts on the latest surgical techniques, the newest equipment, and progress in therapies for rehabilitation. The primary focus of the journal is hand surgery, but articles on the wrist, elbow, and shoulder are also included. Major areas covered include arthroscopy, microvascular surgery, plastic surgery, congenital anomalies, tendon and nerve disorders, trauma, and work-related injuries.