Stress and sex-dependent effects on conditioned inhibition of fear.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Learning & memory Pub Date : 2022-09-02 Print Date: 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1101/lm.053508.121
Jordan M Adkins, Carly J Halcomb, Danielle Rogers, Aaron M Jasnow
{"title":"Stress and sex-dependent effects on conditioned inhibition of fear.","authors":"Jordan M Adkins, Carly J Halcomb, Danielle Rogers, Aaron M Jasnow","doi":"10.1101/lm.053508.121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anxiety and stress-related disorders are highly prevalent and are characterized by excessive fear to threatening and nonthreatening stimuli. Moreover, there is a large sex bias in vulnerability to anxiety and stress-related disorders-women make up a disproportionately larger number of affected individuals compared with men. Growing evidence suggests that an impaired ability to suppress fear in the presence of safety signals may in part contribute to the development and maintenance of many anxiety and stress-related disorders. However, the sex-dependent impact of stress on conditioned inhibition of fear remains unclear. The present study investigated sex differences in the acquisition and recall of conditioned inhibition in male and female mice with a focus on understanding how stress impacts fear suppression. In these experiments, the training context served as the \"fear\" cue and an explicit tone served as the \"safety\" cue. Here, we found a possible sex difference in the training requirements for safety learning, although this effect was not consistent across experiments. Reductions in freezing to the safety cue in female mice were also not due to alternative fear behavior expression such as darting. Next, using footshock as a stressor, we found that males were impaired in conditioned inhibition of freezing when the stress was experienced before, but not after, conditioned inhibition training. Females were unaffected by footshock stress when it was administered at either time. Extended conditioned inhibition training in males eliminated the deficit produced by footshock stress. Finally, exposing male and female mice to swim stress impaired safety learning in male mice only. Thus, we found sex × stress interactions in the learning of conditioned inhibition and sex-dependent effects of stress modality. The present study adds to the growing literature on sex differences in safety learning, which will be critical for developing sex-specific therapies for a variety of fear-related disorders that involve excessive fear and/or impaired fear inhibition.</p>","PeriodicalId":18003,"journal":{"name":"Learning & memory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e2/9e/LM053508Adk.PMC9488025.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning & memory","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.053508.121","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Anxiety and stress-related disorders are highly prevalent and are characterized by excessive fear to threatening and nonthreatening stimuli. Moreover, there is a large sex bias in vulnerability to anxiety and stress-related disorders-women make up a disproportionately larger number of affected individuals compared with men. Growing evidence suggests that an impaired ability to suppress fear in the presence of safety signals may in part contribute to the development and maintenance of many anxiety and stress-related disorders. However, the sex-dependent impact of stress on conditioned inhibition of fear remains unclear. The present study investigated sex differences in the acquisition and recall of conditioned inhibition in male and female mice with a focus on understanding how stress impacts fear suppression. In these experiments, the training context served as the "fear" cue and an explicit tone served as the "safety" cue. Here, we found a possible sex difference in the training requirements for safety learning, although this effect was not consistent across experiments. Reductions in freezing to the safety cue in female mice were also not due to alternative fear behavior expression such as darting. Next, using footshock as a stressor, we found that males were impaired in conditioned inhibition of freezing when the stress was experienced before, but not after, conditioned inhibition training. Females were unaffected by footshock stress when it was administered at either time. Extended conditioned inhibition training in males eliminated the deficit produced by footshock stress. Finally, exposing male and female mice to swim stress impaired safety learning in male mice only. Thus, we found sex × stress interactions in the learning of conditioned inhibition and sex-dependent effects of stress modality. The present study adds to the growing literature on sex differences in safety learning, which will be critical for developing sex-specific therapies for a variety of fear-related disorders that involve excessive fear and/or impaired fear inhibition.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

压力和性别依赖性对恐惧条件抑制的影响。
焦虑和压力相关障碍非常普遍,其特征是对威胁性和非威胁性刺激过度恐惧。此外,与男性相比,女性在易患焦虑和压力相关疾病方面存在很大的性别偏见。越来越多的证据表明,在存在安全信号的情况下,抑制恐惧的能力受损,可能在一定程度上导致许多焦虑和压力相关疾病的发展和维持。然而,压力对恐惧条件抑制的性别依赖性影响尚不清楚。本研究调查了雄性和雌性小鼠在获得和回忆条件抑制方面的性别差异,重点是了解压力如何影响恐惧抑制。在这些实验中,训练环境充当“恐惧”提示,明确的语气充当“安全”提示。在这里,我们发现安全学习的训练要求可能存在性别差异,尽管这种影响在各个实验中并不一致。雌性小鼠冷冻至安全提示的减少也不是由于其他恐惧行为表达,如飞镖。接下来,使用脚跳作为压力源,我们发现,当在条件抑制训练之前而不是之后经历压力时,男性在冷冻的条件抑制中受损。无论在哪种时间给药,雌性都不会受到脚跳压力的影响。对男性进行延长的条件抑制训练可以消除脚跳应激产生的缺陷。最后,将雄性和雌性小鼠暴露在游泳压力下,只会损害雄性小鼠的安全学习。因此,我们发现在条件抑制和压力模式的性别依赖效应的学习中存在性别×压力的相互作用。本研究补充了越来越多的关于安全学习中性别差异的文献,这对于开发针对各种与恐惧相关的疾病的性别特异性疗法至关重要,这些疾病涉及过度恐惧和/或恐惧抑制受损。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Learning & memory
Learning & memory 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The neurobiology of learning and memory is entering a new interdisciplinary era. Advances in neuropsychology have identified regions of brain tissue that are critical for certain types of function. Electrophysiological techniques have revealed behavioral correlates of neuronal activity. Studies of synaptic plasticity suggest that some mechanisms of memory formation may resemble those of neural development. And molecular approaches have identified genes with patterns of expression that influence behavior. It is clear that future progress depends on interdisciplinary investigations. The current literature of learning and memory is large but fragmented. Until now, there has been no single journal devoted to this area of study and no dominant journal that demands attention by serious workers in the area, regardless of specialty. Learning & Memory provides a forum for these investigations in the form of research papers and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信