Investigating traumatic memory integration in people with and without post-traumatic stress disorder using the event-cueing paradigm.

IF 2.2 3区心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL

Memory Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-10 DOI:10.1080/09658211.2023.2232588

Tugba Uzer, Lütfullah Beşiroğlu, Merve Karakılıç, Demet Özen Yalçın, Menekşe Sıla Yazar, Aylin İlden Koçkar

{"title":"Investigating traumatic memory integration in people with and without post-traumatic stress disorder using the event-cueing paradigm.","authors":"Tugba Uzer, Lütfullah Beşiroğlu, Merve Karakılıç, Demet Özen Yalçın, Menekşe Sıla Yazar, Aylin İlden Koçkar","doi":"10.1080/09658211.2023.2232588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Poor integration and landmark views make opposing claims regarding the relationship between post-traumatic stress symptoms and trauma memory integration. This study tested these approaches using an event cluster paradigm. In total, 126 participants (Nptsd = 61; Nnon-ptsd = 65) remembered memories from the same story as trauma, positive and neutral memories and reported whether each memory was directly retrieved or generated. Moreover, the retrieval time (RT) was recorded. Finally, the participants completed the Centrality of Event Scale (CES) and Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Symptom Scale-Self Report (PSS-SR). The results demonstrated that participants with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) recalled their clusters of memories more slowly and less directly than those without PTSD. However, the CES predicted PTSD severity more strongly than RT and retrieval strategy. These results suggest that traumatic memories are more disorganised but perceived as more central in PTSD.","PeriodicalId":18569,"journal":{"name":"Memory","volume":" ","pages":"1176-1184"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Memory","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2023.2232588","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Poor integration and landmark views make opposing claims regarding the relationship between post-traumatic stress symptoms and trauma memory integration. This study tested these approaches using an event cluster paradigm. In total, 126 participants (N_ptsd = 61; N_non-ptsd = 65) remembered memories from the same story as trauma, positive and neutral memories and reported whether each memory was directly retrieved or generated. Moreover, the retrieval time (RT) was recorded. Finally, the participants completed the Centrality of Event Scale (CES) and Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Symptom Scale-Self Report (PSS-SR). The results demonstrated that participants with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) recalled their clusters of memories more slowly and less directly than those without PTSD. However, the CES predicted PTSD severity more strongly than RT and retrieval strategy. These results suggest that traumatic memories are more disorganised but perceived as more central in PTSD.

查看原文本刊更多论文

使用事件提示范式研究有和没有创伤后应激障碍的人的创伤记忆整合。

关于创伤后应激症状和创伤记忆整合之间的关系，整合不良和里程碑式的观点提出了相反的主张。这项研究使用事件集群范式测试了这些方法。总共有126名参与者（Nptsd = 61；Nnon ptsd = 65）记忆与创伤、积极和中性记忆来自同一个故事的记忆，并报告每个记忆是否是直接检索或产生的。此外，记录检索时间（RT）。最后，参与者完成了事件中心性量表（CES）和创伤后应激障碍症状量表自评（PSS-SR）。研究结果表明，患有创伤后应激障碍（PTSD）的参与者比没有PTSD的参与者更慢、更不直接地回忆起自己的记忆簇。然而，CES比RT和检索策略更能预测PTSD的严重程度。这些结果表明，创伤记忆更无序，但在创伤后应激障碍中更为重要。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Memory PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-

CiteScore

3.50

自引率

9.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： Memory publishes high quality papers in all areas of memory research. This includes experimental studies of memory (including laboratory-based research, everyday memory studies, and applied memory research), developmental, educational, neuropsychological, clinical and social research on memory. By representing all significant areas of memory research, the journal cuts across the traditional distinctions of psychological research. Memory therefore provides a unique venue for memory researchers to communicate their findings and ideas both to peers within their own research tradition in the study of memory, and also to the wider range of research communities with direct interest in human memory.