Outcomes of Combined Heart-Kidney Transplantation in Older Recipients.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Curry Sherard, Vineeth Sama, Jennie H Kwon, Khaled Shorbaji, Lauren V Huckaby, Brett A Welch, Chakradhari Inampudi, Ryan J Tedford, Arman Kilic
{"title":"Outcomes of Combined Heart-Kidney Transplantation in Older Recipients.","authors":"Curry Sherard,&nbsp;Vineeth Sama,&nbsp;Jennie H Kwon,&nbsp;Khaled Shorbaji,&nbsp;Lauren V Huckaby,&nbsp;Brett A Welch,&nbsp;Chakradhari Inampudi,&nbsp;Ryan J Tedford,&nbsp;Arman Kilic","doi":"10.1155/2023/4528828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The upper limit of recipient age for combined heart-kidney transplantation (HKT) remains controversial. This study evaluated the outcomes of HKT in patients aged ≥65 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) was used to identify patients undergoing HKT from 2005 to 2021. Patients were stratified by age at transplantation: <65 and ≥ 65 years. The primary outcome was one-year mortality. Secondary outcomes included 90-day and 5-year mortality, postoperative new-onset dialysis, postoperative stroke, acute rejection prior to discharge, and rejection within one-year of HKT. Survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis, and risk adjustment for mortality was performed using Cox proportional hazards modeling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HKT in recipients aged ≥65 significantly increased from 5.6% of all recipients in 2005 to 23.7% in 2021 (<i>p</i>=0.002). Of 2,022 HKT patients in the study period, 372 (18.40%) were aged ≥65. Older recipients were more likely to be male and white, and fewer required dialysis prior to HKT. There were no differences between cohorts in unadjusted 90-day, 1-year, or 5-year survival in Kaplan-Meier analysis. These findings persisted after risk-adjustment, with an adjusted hazard for one-year mortality for age ≥65 of 0.91 (95% CI (0.63-1.29), <i>p</i>=0.572). As a continuous variable, increasing age was not associated with one-year mortality (HR 1.01 (95% CI (1.00-1.02), <i>p</i>=0.236) per year). Patients aged ≥65 more frequently required new-onset dialysis prior to discharge (11.56% vs. 7.82%, <i>p</i>=0.051). Stroke and rejection rates were comparable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combined HKT is increasing in older recipients, and advanced age ≥65 should not preclude HKT.</p>","PeriodicalId":9494,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology Research and Practice","volume":"2023 ","pages":"4528828"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10314816/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/4528828","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: The upper limit of recipient age for combined heart-kidney transplantation (HKT) remains controversial. This study evaluated the outcomes of HKT in patients aged ≥65 years.

Methods: The United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) was used to identify patients undergoing HKT from 2005 to 2021. Patients were stratified by age at transplantation: <65 and ≥ 65 years. The primary outcome was one-year mortality. Secondary outcomes included 90-day and 5-year mortality, postoperative new-onset dialysis, postoperative stroke, acute rejection prior to discharge, and rejection within one-year of HKT. Survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis, and risk adjustment for mortality was performed using Cox proportional hazards modeling.

Results: HKT in recipients aged ≥65 significantly increased from 5.6% of all recipients in 2005 to 23.7% in 2021 (p=0.002). Of 2,022 HKT patients in the study period, 372 (18.40%) were aged ≥65. Older recipients were more likely to be male and white, and fewer required dialysis prior to HKT. There were no differences between cohorts in unadjusted 90-day, 1-year, or 5-year survival in Kaplan-Meier analysis. These findings persisted after risk-adjustment, with an adjusted hazard for one-year mortality for age ≥65 of 0.91 (95% CI (0.63-1.29), p=0.572). As a continuous variable, increasing age was not associated with one-year mortality (HR 1.01 (95% CI (1.00-1.02), p=0.236) per year). Patients aged ≥65 more frequently required new-onset dialysis prior to discharge (11.56% vs. 7.82%, p=0.051). Stroke and rejection rates were comparable.

Conclusion: Combined HKT is increasing in older recipients, and advanced age ≥65 should not preclude HKT.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

老年受者心脏-肾脏联合移植的疗效。
目的:心肾联合移植(HKT)的年龄上限仍有争议。本研究评估了年龄≥65岁患者的HKT预后。方法:使用联合器官共享网络(UNOS)对2005年至2021年接受HKT的患者进行识别。患者按移植年龄分层:结果:≥65岁受者的HKT从2005年的5.6%显著增加到2021年的23.7% (p=0.002)。在研究期间的2,022例HKT患者中,372例(18.40%)年龄≥65岁。年龄较大的接受者更可能是男性和白人,在HKT之前需要透析的人较少。在Kaplan-Meier分析中,未调整的90天、1年或5年生存率在队列之间没有差异。这些发现在风险调整后仍然存在,65岁以上人群一年死亡率的调整风险为0.91 (95% CI (0.63-1.29), p=0.572)。作为一个连续变量,年龄增加与一年死亡率无关(HR 1.01 (95% CI (1.00-1.02), p=0.236)。≥65岁的患者在出院前需要新发透析的频率更高(11.56% vs. 7.82%, p=0.051)。中风和排异率是相当的。结论:联合HKT在老年受者中增加,高龄≥65岁不应排除HKT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiology Research and Practice
Cardiology Research and Practice Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Cardiology Research and Practice is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies that focus on the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. The journal welcomes submissions related to systemic hypertension, arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, vascular disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信