Emotion suppression and acute physiological responses to stress in healthy populations: a quantitative review of experimental and correlational investigations.

IF 6.6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Health Psychology Review Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-30 DOI:10.1080/17437199.2023.2251559
Alexandra T Tyra, Thomas A Fergus, Annie T Ginty
{"title":"Emotion suppression and acute physiological responses to stress in healthy populations: a quantitative review of experimental and correlational investigations.","authors":"Alexandra T Tyra, Thomas A Fergus, Annie T Ginty","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2023.2251559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Emotion suppression may be linked to poor health outcomes through elevated stress-related physiology. The current meta-analyses investigate the magnitude of the association between suppression and physiological responses to active psychological stress tasks administered in the laboratory. Relevant articles were identified through Medline, PsychINFO, PubMed, and ProQuest. Studies were eligible if they (a) used a sample of healthy, human subjects; (b) assessed physiology during a resting baseline and active psychological stress task; and (c) measured self-report or experimentally manipulated suppression. Twenty-four studies were identified and grouped within two separate random effects meta-analyses based on study methodology, namely, manipulated suppression (<i>k</i> = 12) and/or self-report (<i>k</i> = 14). Experimentally manipulated suppression was associated with greater physiological stress reactivity compared to controls (H<sub>g </sub>= 0.20, 95% CI [0.08, 0.33]), primarily driven by cardiac, hemodynamic, and neuroendocrine parameters. Self-report trait suppression was not associated with overall physiological stress reactivity but was associated with greater neuroendocrine reactivity (<i>r </i><sub>=</sub> 0.08, 95% CI [0.01, 0.14]). Significant moderator variables were identified (i.e., type/duration of stress task, nature of control instructions, type of physiology, and gender). This review suggests that suppression may exacerbate stress-induced physiological arousal; however, this may differ based upon the chosen methodological assessment of suppression.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"396-420"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2023.2251559","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Emotion suppression may be linked to poor health outcomes through elevated stress-related physiology. The current meta-analyses investigate the magnitude of the association between suppression and physiological responses to active psychological stress tasks administered in the laboratory. Relevant articles were identified through Medline, PsychINFO, PubMed, and ProQuest. Studies were eligible if they (a) used a sample of healthy, human subjects; (b) assessed physiology during a resting baseline and active psychological stress task; and (c) measured self-report or experimentally manipulated suppression. Twenty-four studies were identified and grouped within two separate random effects meta-analyses based on study methodology, namely, manipulated suppression (k = 12) and/or self-report (k = 14). Experimentally manipulated suppression was associated with greater physiological stress reactivity compared to controls (Hg = 0.20, 95% CI [0.08, 0.33]), primarily driven by cardiac, hemodynamic, and neuroendocrine parameters. Self-report trait suppression was not associated with overall physiological stress reactivity but was associated with greater neuroendocrine reactivity (r = 0.08, 95% CI [0.01, 0.14]). Significant moderator variables were identified (i.e., type/duration of stress task, nature of control instructions, type of physiology, and gender). This review suggests that suppression may exacerbate stress-induced physiological arousal; however, this may differ based upon the chosen methodological assessment of suppression.

健康人群对压力的情绪抑制和急性生理反应:实验和相关调查的定量回顾。
情绪抑制可能会通过压力相关生理机能的升高而与不良的健康结果相关联。目前的荟萃分析调查了情绪抑制与实验室主动心理压力任务生理反应之间的关联程度。相关文章通过 Medline、PsychINFO、PubMed 和 ProQuest 进行鉴定。符合以下条件的研究均可作为研究对象:(a) 使用健康的人类受试者样本;(b) 评估静息基线和主动心理压力任务期间的生理状况;(c) 测量自我报告或实验操纵的抑制。根据研究方法,即操纵性抑制(k = 12)和/或自我报告(k = 14),确定了 24 项研究,并将其归入两个独立的随机效应荟萃分析中。与对照组相比,实验操纵抑制与更大的生理压力反应相关(Hg = 0.20,95% CI [0.08,0.33]),主要由心脏、血液动力学和神经内分泌参数驱动。自我报告的特质抑郁与总体生理压力反应性无关,但与更大的神经内分泌反应性相关(r = 0.08,95% CI [0.01,0.14])。研究发现了一些重要的调节变量(即压力任务的类型/持续时间、控制指示的性质、生理类型和性别)。这篇综述表明,抑制可能会加剧压力引起的生理唤醒;但是,这可能会根据所选择的抑制方法评估而有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Psychology Review
Health Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The publication of Health Psychology Review (HPR) marks a significant milestone in the field of health psychology, as it is the first review journal dedicated to this important and rapidly growing discipline. Edited by a highly respected team, HPR provides a critical platform for the review, development of theories, and conceptual advancements in health psychology. This prestigious international forum not only contributes to the progress of health psychology but also fosters its connection with the broader field of psychology and other related academic and professional domains. With its vital insights, HPR is a must-read for those involved in the study, teaching, and practice of health psychology, behavioral medicine, and related areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信