Comparing Effects of Rhythmic Breathing and Lidocaine Spray on Pain Intensity During Needle Insertion Into Arteriovenous Fistula in Hemodialysis Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Q2 Medicine
Houman Sadeghpour Marvi, Tahereh Baloochi Beydokhti, Moosa Sajjadi, Behruz Khaleghimanesh
{"title":"Comparing Effects of Rhythmic Breathing and Lidocaine Spray on Pain Intensity During Needle Insertion Into Arteriovenous Fistula in Hemodialysis Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Houman Sadeghpour Marvi,&nbsp;Tahereh Baloochi Beydokhti,&nbsp;Moosa Sajjadi,&nbsp;Behruz Khaleghimanesh","doi":"10.5812/aapm-126384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hemodialysis patients suffer from pain caused by needle insertion into the fistula site. Non-pharmacological methods may be associated with acceptable effects.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The present study aimed to compare the effects of two interventions on pain intensity during needle insertion into the arteriovenous fistula in hemodialysis patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This self-controlled, single-blind clinical trial was conducted on 54 hemodialysis subjects with arteriovenous fistula in Mashhad in 2021. In this regard, the patients were selected according to the inclusion criteria and randomly assigned to two groups (lidocaine spray and rhythmic breathing). In each group, pain intensity was assessed based on the visual analogue scale (VAS) before the intervention, followed by measuring the post-intervention pain intensity during three consecutive hemodialysis sessions every other day. Regarding the lidocaine spray group, two puffs of 10% lidocaine spray (20 mg) were sprayed on the needle insertion site five minutes before cannulation. However, the patients in another group took a long deep breath through the nose with three numbers, held their breath in the lungs for three numbers, and slowly exhaled through the mouth with three numbers two minutes before cannulation. The data were analyzed using SPSS software version 20, and Mann-Whitney U, Wilcoxon, chi-squared, and paired <i>t</i>-tests were run. In this study, P < 0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results represented a significant decrease in the pain severity scores of both rhythmic breathing (P = 0.023) and lidocaine spray (P < 0.001) groups after the intervention. Moreover, a more significant difference was observed between pre-and post-intervention pain intensity scores in the group treated with lidocaine spray (1.16 ± 1.56) compared to the other group (0.508 ± 1.25).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The lidocaine spray group had a larger difference in the pre-and post-intervention pain intensity scores than the rhythmic group; however, the difference was not significant. The rhythmic breathing can be used by nurses as a non-pharmacological method with low complications in hemodialysis departments because of declining pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":7841,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","volume":"13 2","pages":"e126384"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6a/33/aapm-13-2-126384.PMC10461387.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-126384","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hemodialysis patients suffer from pain caused by needle insertion into the fistula site. Non-pharmacological methods may be associated with acceptable effects.

Objectives: The present study aimed to compare the effects of two interventions on pain intensity during needle insertion into the arteriovenous fistula in hemodialysis patients.

Methods: This self-controlled, single-blind clinical trial was conducted on 54 hemodialysis subjects with arteriovenous fistula in Mashhad in 2021. In this regard, the patients were selected according to the inclusion criteria and randomly assigned to two groups (lidocaine spray and rhythmic breathing). In each group, pain intensity was assessed based on the visual analogue scale (VAS) before the intervention, followed by measuring the post-intervention pain intensity during three consecutive hemodialysis sessions every other day. Regarding the lidocaine spray group, two puffs of 10% lidocaine spray (20 mg) were sprayed on the needle insertion site five minutes before cannulation. However, the patients in another group took a long deep breath through the nose with three numbers, held their breath in the lungs for three numbers, and slowly exhaled through the mouth with three numbers two minutes before cannulation. The data were analyzed using SPSS software version 20, and Mann-Whitney U, Wilcoxon, chi-squared, and paired t-tests were run. In this study, P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results: The results represented a significant decrease in the pain severity scores of both rhythmic breathing (P = 0.023) and lidocaine spray (P < 0.001) groups after the intervention. Moreover, a more significant difference was observed between pre-and post-intervention pain intensity scores in the group treated with lidocaine spray (1.16 ± 1.56) compared to the other group (0.508 ± 1.25).

Conclusions: The lidocaine spray group had a larger difference in the pre-and post-intervention pain intensity scores than the rhythmic group; however, the difference was not significant. The rhythmic breathing can be used by nurses as a non-pharmacological method with low complications in hemodialysis departments because of declining pain.

Abstract Image

比较节奏呼吸和利多卡因喷雾对血液透析患者动静脉瘘穿刺疼痛强度的影响:一项随机对照试验。
背景:血液透析患者常因针头插入瘘管部位引起疼痛。非药物方法可能与可接受的效果相关联。目的:本研究旨在比较两种干预措施对血液透析患者动静脉瘘插入过程中疼痛强度的影响。方法:于2021年在马什哈德对54例血液透析动静脉瘘患者进行自我对照、单盲临床试验。根据纳入标准选择患者,随机分为两组(利多卡因喷雾组和节律呼吸组)。在每组中,干预前根据视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛强度,随后每隔一天测量干预后连续三次血液透析期间的疼痛强度。利多卡因喷雾组在插管前5分钟,将10%利多卡因喷雾剂(20mg)喷于插针部位2次。而另一组患者则在插管前两分钟,用鼻子长时间深呼吸,用肺憋气,用三个数字,然后用嘴慢慢呼出。采用SPSS软件第20版对数据进行分析,采用Mann-Whitney U、Wilcoxon、卡方、配对t检验。在本研究中,P < 0.05为显著性。结果:干预后节律性呼吸组(P = 0.023)和利多卡因喷雾组(P < 0.001)疼痛严重程度评分均显著降低。此外,利多卡因喷雾组干预前后疼痛强度评分(1.16±1.56)比另一组(0.508±1.25)差异更显著。结论:利多卡因喷雾组干预前后疼痛强度评分差异大于节奏组;然而,差异并不显著。有节奏呼吸法可作为一种并发症低的非药物治疗方法,在血液透析科室因疼痛减轻而被护士采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信