A multivariate approach to understanding the genetic overlap between externalizing phenotypes and substance use disorders

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Holly E. Poore, Alexander Hatoum, Travis T. Mallard, Sandra Sanchez-Roige, Irwin D. Waldman, Abraham A. Palmer, K. Paige Harden, Peter B. Barr, Danielle M. Dick
{"title":"A multivariate approach to understanding the genetic overlap between externalizing phenotypes and substance use disorders","authors":"Holly E. Poore,&nbsp;Alexander Hatoum,&nbsp;Travis T. Mallard,&nbsp;Sandra Sanchez-Roige,&nbsp;Irwin D. Waldman,&nbsp;Abraham A. Palmer,&nbsp;K. Paige Harden,&nbsp;Peter B. Barr,&nbsp;Danielle M. Dick","doi":"10.1111/adb.13319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Substance use disorders (SUDs) are phenotypically and genetically correlated with each other and with other psychological traits characterized by behavioural under-control, termed externalizing phenotypes. In this study, we used genomic structural equation modelling to explore the shared genetic architecture among six externalizing phenotypes and four SUDs used in two previous multivariate genome-wide association studies of an externalizing and an addiction risk factor, respectively. We first evaluated five confirmatory factor analytic models, including a common factor model, alternative parameterizations of two-factor structures and a bifactor model. We next explored the genetic correlations between factors identified in these models and other relevant psychological traits. Finally, we quantified the degree of polygenic overlap between externalizing and addiction risk using MiXeR. We found that the common and two-factor structures provided the best fit to the data, evidenced by high factor loadings, good factor reliability and no evidence of concerning model characteristics. The two-factor models yielded high genetic correlations between factors (<i>r</i><sub>g</sub>s ≥ 0.87), and between the effect sizes of genetic correlations with external traits (<i>r</i><sub>g</sub> ≥ 0.95). Nevertheless, 21 of the 84 correlations with external criteria showed small, significant differences between externalizing and addiction risk factors. MiXer results showed that approximately 81% of influential externalizing variants were shared with addiction risk, whereas addiction risk shared 56% of its influential variants with externalizing. These results suggest that externalizing and addiction genetic risk are largely shared, though both constructs also retain meaningful unshared genetic variance. These results can inform future efforts to identify specific genetic influences on externalizing and SUDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7289,"journal":{"name":"Addiction Biology","volume":"28 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/adb.13319","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/adb.13319","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Substance use disorders (SUDs) are phenotypically and genetically correlated with each other and with other psychological traits characterized by behavioural under-control, termed externalizing phenotypes. In this study, we used genomic structural equation modelling to explore the shared genetic architecture among six externalizing phenotypes and four SUDs used in two previous multivariate genome-wide association studies of an externalizing and an addiction risk factor, respectively. We first evaluated five confirmatory factor analytic models, including a common factor model, alternative parameterizations of two-factor structures and a bifactor model. We next explored the genetic correlations between factors identified in these models and other relevant psychological traits. Finally, we quantified the degree of polygenic overlap between externalizing and addiction risk using MiXeR. We found that the common and two-factor structures provided the best fit to the data, evidenced by high factor loadings, good factor reliability and no evidence of concerning model characteristics. The two-factor models yielded high genetic correlations between factors (rgs ≥ 0.87), and between the effect sizes of genetic correlations with external traits (rg ≥ 0.95). Nevertheless, 21 of the 84 correlations with external criteria showed small, significant differences between externalizing and addiction risk factors. MiXer results showed that approximately 81% of influential externalizing variants were shared with addiction risk, whereas addiction risk shared 56% of its influential variants with externalizing. These results suggest that externalizing and addiction genetic risk are largely shared, though both constructs also retain meaningful unshared genetic variance. These results can inform future efforts to identify specific genetic influences on externalizing and SUDs.

Abstract Image

了解外化表型和物质使用障碍之间基因重叠的多变量方法。
物质使用障碍(SUD)在表型和遗传上相互关联,并与其他以行为受控为特征的心理特征相关,称为外化表型。在这项研究中,我们使用基因组结构方程模型来探索六种外化表型和四种SUD之间的共享遗传结构,这两项研究分别用于外化和成瘾风险因素的两项多变量全基因组关联研究。我们首先评估了五个验证性因素分析模型,包括一个公共因素模型、两个因素结构的替代参数化和一个双因子模型。接下来,我们探讨了这些模型中确定的因素与其他相关心理特征之间的遗传相关性。最后,我们使用MiXeR量化了外化和成瘾风险之间的多基因重叠程度。我们发现,公共和双因子结构提供了与数据的最佳拟合,这一点可以通过高因子载荷、良好的因子可靠性和没有相关模型特征的证据来证明。两个因子模型在因子之间产生了高的遗传相关性(rgs≥ 0.87),以及与外部性状的遗传相关性的效应大小之间(rg≥ 0.95)。然而,在84个与外部标准的相关性中,有21个在外化和成瘾风险因素之间表现出微小而显著的差异。MiXer的结果显示,大约81%的有影响力的外化变体与成瘾风险共享,而成瘾风险与外化共享56%的有影响力变体。这些结果表明,外化和成瘾的遗传风险在很大程度上是共同的,尽管这两种结构也保留了有意义的非共享遗传变异。这些结果可以为未来确定外化和SUD的特定基因影响提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Addiction Biology
Addiction Biology 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
118
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Addiction Biology is focused on neuroscience contributions and it aims to advance our understanding of the action of drugs of abuse and addictive processes. Papers are accepted in both animal experimentation or clinical research. The content is geared towards behavioral, molecular, genetic, biochemical, neuro-biological and pharmacology aspects of these fields. Addiction Biology includes peer-reviewed original research reports and reviews. Addiction Biology is published on behalf of the Society for the Study of Addiction to Alcohol and other Drugs (SSA). Members of the Society for the Study of Addiction receive the Journal as part of their annual membership subscription.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信