Risk of imported malaria infections in Zanzibar: a cross-sectional study.

IF 8.1 1区 医学
Bakar S Fakih, Aurel Holzschuh, Amanda Ross, Logan Stuck, Ramadhan Abdul, Abdul-Wahid H Al-Mafazy, Imani Irema, Abdallah Mbena, Sumaiyya G Thawer, Shija J Shija, Safia M Aliy, Abdullah Ali, Günther Fink, Joshua Yukich, Manuel W Hetzel
{"title":"Risk of imported malaria infections in Zanzibar: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Bakar S Fakih, Aurel Holzschuh, Amanda Ross, Logan Stuck, Ramadhan Abdul, Abdul-Wahid H Al-Mafazy, Imani Irema, Abdallah Mbena, Sumaiyya G Thawer, Shija J Shija, Safia M Aliy, Abdullah Ali, Günther Fink, Joshua Yukich, Manuel W Hetzel","doi":"10.1186/s40249-023-01129-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Zanzibar has made substantial progress in malaria control with vector control, improved diagnosis, and artemisinin-based combination therapy. Parasite prevalence in the population has remained around 1% but imported infections from mainland Tanzania contribute to sustained local transmission. Understanding travel patterns between mainland Tanzania and Zanzibar, and the risk of malaria infection, may help to control malaria importation to Zanzibar.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A rolling cross-sectional survey linked to routine reactive case detection of malaria was carried out in Zanzibar between May 2017 and October 2018. Households of patients diagnosed with malaria at health facilities were surveyed and household members were tested for malaria using rapid diagnostic tests and a sub-sample by quantitative PCR (qPCR). Interviews elicited a detailed travel history of all household members who had travelled within the past two months, including trips within and outside of Zanzibar. We estimated the association of malaria infection with travel destinations in pre-defined malaria endemicity categories, trip duration, and other co-variates using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 17,891 survey participants, 1177 (7%) reported a recent trip, of which 769 (65%) visited mainland Tanzania. Among travellers to mainland Tanzania with travel destination details and a qPCR result available, 241/378 (64%) reported traveling to districts with a 'high' malaria endemicity and for 12% the highest endemicity category was 'moderate'. Travelers to the mainland were more likely to be infected with malaria parasites (29%, 108/378) than those traveling within Zanzibar (8%, 16/206) or to other countries (6%, 2/17). Among travellers to mainland Tanzania, those visiting highly endemic districts had a higher odds of being qPCR-positive than those who travelled only to districts where malaria-endemicity was classified as low or very low (adjusted odd ratio = 7.0, 95% confidence interval: 1.9-25.5). Among travellers to the mainland, 110/378 (29%) never or only sometimes used a mosquito net during their travel.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Strategies to reduce malaria importation to Zanzibar may benefit from identifying population groups traveling to highly endemic areas in mainland Tanzania. Targeted interventions to prevent and clear infections in these groups may be more feasible than attempting to screen and treat all travellers upon arrival in Zanzibar.</p>","PeriodicalId":48820,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases of Poverty","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10464242/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Diseases of Poverty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-023-01129-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Zanzibar has made substantial progress in malaria control with vector control, improved diagnosis, and artemisinin-based combination therapy. Parasite prevalence in the population has remained around 1% but imported infections from mainland Tanzania contribute to sustained local transmission. Understanding travel patterns between mainland Tanzania and Zanzibar, and the risk of malaria infection, may help to control malaria importation to Zanzibar.

Methods: A rolling cross-sectional survey linked to routine reactive case detection of malaria was carried out in Zanzibar between May 2017 and October 2018. Households of patients diagnosed with malaria at health facilities were surveyed and household members were tested for malaria using rapid diagnostic tests and a sub-sample by quantitative PCR (qPCR). Interviews elicited a detailed travel history of all household members who had travelled within the past two months, including trips within and outside of Zanzibar. We estimated the association of malaria infection with travel destinations in pre-defined malaria endemicity categories, trip duration, and other co-variates using logistic regression.

Results: Of 17,891 survey participants, 1177 (7%) reported a recent trip, of which 769 (65%) visited mainland Tanzania. Among travellers to mainland Tanzania with travel destination details and a qPCR result available, 241/378 (64%) reported traveling to districts with a 'high' malaria endemicity and for 12% the highest endemicity category was 'moderate'. Travelers to the mainland were more likely to be infected with malaria parasites (29%, 108/378) than those traveling within Zanzibar (8%, 16/206) or to other countries (6%, 2/17). Among travellers to mainland Tanzania, those visiting highly endemic districts had a higher odds of being qPCR-positive than those who travelled only to districts where malaria-endemicity was classified as low or very low (adjusted odd ratio = 7.0, 95% confidence interval: 1.9-25.5). Among travellers to the mainland, 110/378 (29%) never or only sometimes used a mosquito net during their travel.

Conclusions: Strategies to reduce malaria importation to Zanzibar may benefit from identifying population groups traveling to highly endemic areas in mainland Tanzania. Targeted interventions to prevent and clear infections in these groups may be more feasible than attempting to screen and treat all travellers upon arrival in Zanzibar.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

桑给巴尔输入性疟疾感染风险:一项横断面研究。
背景:桑给巴尔在疟疾控制方面取得了实质性进展,包括媒介控制、改进诊断和以青蒿素为基础的联合治疗。人口中的寄生虫流行率保持在1%左右,但来自坦桑尼亚大陆的输入性感染助长了持续的当地传播。了解坦桑尼亚大陆和桑给巴尔之间的旅行模式以及疟疾感染的风险,可能有助于控制疟疾输入到桑给巴尔。方法:于2017年5月至2018年10月在桑给巴尔进行与常规反应性疟疾病例检测相关的滚动横断面调查。对在卫生机构被诊断为疟疾的患者的家庭进行了调查,并使用快速诊断测试对家庭成员进行了疟疾检测,并通过定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)对亚样本进行了检测。采访获得了过去两个月内旅行过的所有家庭成员的详细旅行历史,包括在桑给巴尔境内和境外旅行。我们使用逻辑回归估计了疟疾感染与预先定义的疟疾流行类别、旅行时间和其他协变量的旅行目的地的关联。结果:在17,891名调查参与者中,1177名(7%)报告了最近的旅行,其中769名(65%)访问了坦桑尼亚大陆。在可获得旅行目的地详细信息和qPCR结果的坦桑尼亚大陆旅行者中,241/378(64%)报告前往疟疾“高”流行地区,12%的最高流行类别为“中度”。前往大陆的旅行者(29%,108/378)比在桑给巴尔(8%,16/206)或前往其他国家(6%,2/17)的旅行者更容易感染疟原虫(29%,108/378)。在前往坦桑尼亚大陆的旅行者中,访问疟疾高流行地区的旅行者比只前往疟疾流行程度低或非常低的地区的旅行者qpcr阳性的几率更高(调整奇数比= 7.0,95%置信区间:1.9-25.5)。在前往大陆的旅行者中,110/378(29%)在旅行期间从未或只是偶尔使用蚊帐。结论:确定前往坦桑尼亚大陆高流行地区的人群可能有利于减少疟疾输入到桑给巴尔的战略。在这些人群中预防和清除感染的有针对性的干预措施可能比试图在抵达桑给巴尔时对所有旅行者进行筛查和治疗更为可行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infectious Diseases of Poverty
Infectious Diseases of Poverty INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
自引率
1.20%
发文量
368
期刊介绍: Infectious Diseases of Poverty is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that focuses on addressing essential public health questions related to infectious diseases of poverty. The journal covers a wide range of topics including the biology of pathogens and vectors, diagnosis and detection, treatment and case management, epidemiology and modeling, zoonotic hosts and animal reservoirs, control strategies and implementation, new technologies and application. It also considers the transdisciplinary or multisectoral effects on health systems, ecohealth, environmental management, and innovative technology. The journal aims to identify and assess research and information gaps that hinder progress towards new interventions for public health problems in the developing world. Additionally, it provides a platform for discussing these issues to advance research and evidence building for improved public health interventions in poor settings.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信