[Efficacy and safety evaluation of immunotherapy combined with targeted therapy as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma].

Q3 Medicine
J Wang, W S Wei, L J Jiang, Z L Zhang, S J Guo, H Han, F J Zhou, P Dong
{"title":"[Efficacy and safety evaluation of immunotherapy combined with targeted therapy as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma].","authors":"J Wang,&nbsp;W S Wei,&nbsp;L J Jiang,&nbsp;Z L Zhang,&nbsp;S J Guo,&nbsp;H Han,&nbsp;F J Zhou,&nbsp;P Dong","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20220330-00220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor combined tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy versus TKI monotherapy as the second-line regimen for patients with metastatic non-clear cell renal carcinoma (nccRCC) who failed first-line TKI therapy. <b>Methods:</b> The clinicopathological data of 67 patients with metastatic nccRCC who failed first-line TKI therapy between October 2011 and September 2020 were retrospectively analyzed, including 22 patients who received TKI monotherapy and 45 patients who received TKI plus PD-1 inhibitor as the second-line therapy. The efficacy was assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.0/1.1 (RECIST 1.0/1.1), the Kaplan-Meier method was used to plot the survival curves, and the Log rank test was used to analyze the differences in the survival between the two groups. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) after treatment were observed in both groups. <b>Results:</b> The overall objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 37.3% (25/67) and 56.7% (38/67), respectively. The overall second-line progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.7 months and Overall Survival (OS) was 25.2 months. The ORR and DCR of patients in the combination therapy group were 48.9% (22/45) and 71.1% (32/45), respectively, which were significantly improved compared with the TKI monotherapy group [13.6% (3/22) and 27.3% (6/22), respectively] (<i>P</i>=0.007 and <i>P</i>=0.001, respectively). The median PFS of 9.2 months for second-line treatment was longer in patients in the combination therapy group than in the TKI monotherapy group (5.2 months, <i>P</i>=0.001), but the median OS was not statistically different between the two groups (28.2 months vs 20.8 months, <i>P</i>=0.068). Common treatment-related AEs included hypertension, diarrhea, fatigue, stomatitis, hand-foot syndrome, and hypothyroidism. The incidence of hypothyroidism was higher in the combination therapy group [40.0% (18/45)] than in the TKI monotherapy group [22.7% (5/22), <i>P</i>=0.044]; the incidence of other treatment-related AEs between the two groups were not statistically significant (all <i>P</i>>0.05). <b>Conclusion:</b> Immune-targeted combination therapy was more effective than TKI monotherapy alone and was well tolerated in the treatment of metastatic nccRCC patients who failed first-line TKIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":39868,"journal":{"name":"中华肿瘤杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华肿瘤杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20220330-00220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor combined tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy versus TKI monotherapy as the second-line regimen for patients with metastatic non-clear cell renal carcinoma (nccRCC) who failed first-line TKI therapy. Methods: The clinicopathological data of 67 patients with metastatic nccRCC who failed first-line TKI therapy between October 2011 and September 2020 were retrospectively analyzed, including 22 patients who received TKI monotherapy and 45 patients who received TKI plus PD-1 inhibitor as the second-line therapy. The efficacy was assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.0/1.1 (RECIST 1.0/1.1), the Kaplan-Meier method was used to plot the survival curves, and the Log rank test was used to analyze the differences in the survival between the two groups. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) after treatment were observed in both groups. Results: The overall objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 37.3% (25/67) and 56.7% (38/67), respectively. The overall second-line progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.7 months and Overall Survival (OS) was 25.2 months. The ORR and DCR of patients in the combination therapy group were 48.9% (22/45) and 71.1% (32/45), respectively, which were significantly improved compared with the TKI monotherapy group [13.6% (3/22) and 27.3% (6/22), respectively] (P=0.007 and P=0.001, respectively). The median PFS of 9.2 months for second-line treatment was longer in patients in the combination therapy group than in the TKI monotherapy group (5.2 months, P=0.001), but the median OS was not statistically different between the two groups (28.2 months vs 20.8 months, P=0.068). Common treatment-related AEs included hypertension, diarrhea, fatigue, stomatitis, hand-foot syndrome, and hypothyroidism. The incidence of hypothyroidism was higher in the combination therapy group [40.0% (18/45)] than in the TKI monotherapy group [22.7% (5/22), P=0.044]; the incidence of other treatment-related AEs between the two groups were not statistically significant (all P>0.05). Conclusion: Immune-targeted combination therapy was more effective than TKI monotherapy alone and was well tolerated in the treatment of metastatic nccRCC patients who failed first-line TKIs.

【免疫治疗联合靶向治疗作为二线治疗转移性非透明细胞肾细胞癌的疗效和安全性评价】。
目的:本研究旨在评估程序性死亡-1 (PD-1)抑制剂联合酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)治疗与TKI单药治疗作为转移性非透明细胞肾癌(nccRCC)患者一线TKI治疗失败的二线方案的有效性和安全性。方法:回顾性分析2011年10月至2020年9月67例TKI一线治疗失败的转移性nccRCC患者的临床病理资料,其中TKI单药治疗22例,TKI联合PD-1抑制剂二线治疗45例。按照实体瘤1.0/1.1版应答评价标准(RECIST 1.0/1.1)评价疗效,采用Kaplan-Meier法绘制生存曲线,采用Log rank检验分析两组患者的生存差异。观察两组治疗后的治疗相关不良事件(ae)。结果:总客观有效率(ORR)和疾病控制率(DCR)分别为37.3%(25/67)和56.7%(38/67)。总二线无进展生存期(PFS)为7.7个月,总生存期(OS)为25.2个月。联合治疗组患者的ORR和DCR分别为48.9%(22/45)和71.1%(32/45),较TKI单药治疗组[分别为13.6%(3/22)和27.3%(6/22)]有显著改善(P=0.007和P=0.001)。联合治疗组患者二线治疗的中位PFS为9.2个月,高于TKI单药治疗组(5.2个月,P=0.001),但两组患者的中位OS无统计学差异(28.2个月vs 20.8个月,P=0.068)。常见的与治疗相关的不良反应包括高血压、腹泻、疲劳、口炎、手足综合征和甲状腺功能减退。联合治疗组甲状腺功能减退发生率[40.0%(18/45)]高于TKI单药治疗组[22.7% (5/22),P=0.044];两组其他治疗相关不良事件发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:免疫靶向联合治疗一线TKI治疗失败的转移性nccRCC患者比单用TKI治疗更有效,且耐受性良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中华肿瘤杂志
中华肿瘤杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10433
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信