Effect of OPRM1/COMT gene polymorphisms on sufentanil labor analgesia: a cohort study based on propensity score matching.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Pharmacogenomics Pub Date : 2023-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-23 DOI:10.2217/pgs-2023-0103
Yao Chen, Quanyao Chen, Can Cai, Xiuxian Lin, Weiwei Yu, Huiqiong Huang, Wenmin Xie, Min Lin, Weida Chen, Hui Wu, Tingting Su, Lingsong Wang
{"title":"Effect of <i>OPRM1/COMT</i> gene polymorphisms on sufentanil labor analgesia: a cohort study based on propensity score matching.","authors":"Yao Chen, Quanyao Chen, Can Cai, Xiuxian Lin, Weiwei Yu, Huiqiong Huang, Wenmin Xie, Min Lin, Weida Chen, Hui Wu, Tingting Su, Lingsong Wang","doi":"10.2217/pgs-2023-0103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> This study investigated the use of <i>COMT</i> G1947A and <i>OPRM1</i> A118G polymorphisms as predictive markers for sufentanil epidural analgesia. <b>Methods:</b> The visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and sufentanil consumption of 136 pairs of parturients using sufentanil with lidocaine and ropivacaine for epidural analgesia were used for analysis. <b>Results:</b> <i>OPRM1</i> AG/GG had lower VAS score difference between fifth and 0 min (1.55 vs 1.87; p = 0.012) and higher consumption (19.65 μg vs 17.11 μg; p = 0.049) than AA carriers. <i>COMT</i> GA/AA had higher VAS score difference than GG carriers (1.86 vs 1.55; p = 0.021). <b>Conclusion:</b> Sufentanil may provide better epidural labor analgesia in <i>OPRM1</i> AA and <i>COMT</i> GA/AA carriers compared with <i>OPRM1</i> AG/GG and <i>COMT</i> GG carriers. <b>Clinical Trial Registration</b>: ChiCTR1900026897 (Chinese Clinical Trial Center Registry).</p>","PeriodicalId":20018,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacogenomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacogenomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/pgs-2023-0103","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study investigated the use of COMT G1947A and OPRM1 A118G polymorphisms as predictive markers for sufentanil epidural analgesia. Methods: The visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and sufentanil consumption of 136 pairs of parturients using sufentanil with lidocaine and ropivacaine for epidural analgesia were used for analysis. Results: OPRM1 AG/GG had lower VAS score difference between fifth and 0 min (1.55 vs 1.87; p = 0.012) and higher consumption (19.65 μg vs 17.11 μg; p = 0.049) than AA carriers. COMT GA/AA had higher VAS score difference than GG carriers (1.86 vs 1.55; p = 0.021). Conclusion: Sufentanil may provide better epidural labor analgesia in OPRM1 AA and COMT GA/AA carriers compared with OPRM1 AG/GG and COMT GG carriers. Clinical Trial Registration: ChiCTR1900026897 (Chinese Clinical Trial Center Registry).

OPRM1/COMT基因多态性对舒芬太尼分娩镇痛的影响:一项基于倾向评分匹配的队列研究。
背景:本研究探讨了COMT G1947A和OPRM1 A118G多态性作为舒芬太尼硬膜外镇痛预测标志物的应用。方法:采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分和136对舒芬太尼联合利多卡因和罗哌卡因硬膜外镇痛产妇的舒芬太尼用量进行分析。结果:与AA携带者相比,OPRM1AG/GG在第5分钟和第0分钟的VAS评分差异较低(1.55 vs 1.87;p=0.012),消耗量较高(19.65μg vs 17.11μg;p=0.049)。结论:舒芬太尼对OPRM1-AA和COMT-GA/AA的硬膜外分娩镇痛效果优于OPRM1-AG/GG和COMT-GG。临床试验注册:ChiCTR1900026897(中国临床试验中心注册处)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmacogenomics
Pharmacogenomics 医学-药学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
9.50%
发文量
88
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pharmacogenomics (ISSN 1462-2416) is a peer-reviewed journal presenting reviews and reports by the researchers and decision-makers closely involved in this rapidly developing area. Key objectives are to provide the community with an essential resource for keeping abreast of the latest developments in all areas of this exciting field. Pharmacogenomics is the leading source of commentary and analysis, bringing you the highest quality expert analyses from corporate and academic opinion leaders in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信