Intra- and Inter-rater Reliability of Postoperative Radiographic Analysis of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in 49 Shoulders After Proximal Humerus Fracture.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Pierre Tuphé, Ines Regas, Fiona Sakek, Harrison Haight, Isabelle Pluvy, Tristan Lascar, Laurent Obert, François Loisel
{"title":"Intra- and Inter-rater Reliability of Postoperative Radiographic Analysis of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in 49 Shoulders After Proximal Humerus Fracture.","authors":"Pierre Tuphé,&nbsp;Ines Regas,&nbsp;Fiona Sakek,&nbsp;Harrison Haight,&nbsp;Isabelle Pluvy,&nbsp;Tristan Lascar,&nbsp;Laurent Obert,&nbsp;François Loisel","doi":"10.1007/s43465-022-00716-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The lateralization shoulder angle (LSA), the distalization shoulder angle (DSA) and the new \"pentagon\" concept are tools used in scheduled shoulder surgery to evaluate the positioning of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) implants. There is no information on the intra- and inter-rater reliability of these tools in the context of RSA for a proximal humerus fracture. The first hypothesis was the high reliability of the intra- and inter-rater analysis of the LSA and DSA angles. The second hypothesis was the reproductibility of the pentagon based on LSA and DSA analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-nine patients were evaluated retrospectively with a minimum of 2 years radiological follow-up after RSA surgery. Tuberosity healing was evaluated using an AP radiograph of the shoulder and their location analyzed within the said \"pentagon\" defined by the LSA/DSA angles and the maximum lengthening recommended.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intra-rater analysis found strong to an almost perfect agreement for the LSA and DSA. The agreement was moderate to strong for the pentagon. The inter-rater analysis found a fair agreement for the LSA and moderate agreement for the DSA and pentagon.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The LSA/DSA is used in patients undergoing RSA for glenohumeral OA. In this context, the tuberosities were intact and certain complications inherent to RSA for humeral fracture were not present. The population studied here (RSA after fracture) creates an interpretation bias due to the difficulty in analyzing tuberosity position.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>4, retrospective study.</p>","PeriodicalId":13338,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","volume":"56 11","pages":"2013-2021"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9561354/pdf/43465_2022_Article_716.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-022-00716-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The lateralization shoulder angle (LSA), the distalization shoulder angle (DSA) and the new "pentagon" concept are tools used in scheduled shoulder surgery to evaluate the positioning of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) implants. There is no information on the intra- and inter-rater reliability of these tools in the context of RSA for a proximal humerus fracture. The first hypothesis was the high reliability of the intra- and inter-rater analysis of the LSA and DSA angles. The second hypothesis was the reproductibility of the pentagon based on LSA and DSA analysis.

Methods: Forty-nine patients were evaluated retrospectively with a minimum of 2 years radiological follow-up after RSA surgery. Tuberosity healing was evaluated using an AP radiograph of the shoulder and their location analyzed within the said "pentagon" defined by the LSA/DSA angles and the maximum lengthening recommended.

Results: The intra-rater analysis found strong to an almost perfect agreement for the LSA and DSA. The agreement was moderate to strong for the pentagon. The inter-rater analysis found a fair agreement for the LSA and moderate agreement for the DSA and pentagon.

Conclusion: The LSA/DSA is used in patients undergoing RSA for glenohumeral OA. In this context, the tuberosities were intact and certain complications inherent to RSA for humeral fracture were not present. The population studied here (RSA after fracture) creates an interpretation bias due to the difficulty in analyzing tuberosity position.

Level of evidence: 4, retrospective study.

49例肱骨近端骨折后肩关节置换术术后x线片内、间可靠性分析。
简介:侧肩角(LSA)、远侧肩角(DSA)和新的“五角形”概念是定期肩关节手术中评估反向肩关节置换术(RSA)植入物定位的工具。目前还没有关于肱骨近端骨折RSA中这些工具的内、间可靠性的资料。第一个假设是对LSA和DSA角度的内部和内部分析的高可靠性。第二个假设是基于LSA和DSA分析的五边形的可重复性。方法:对49例RSA术后至少2年的放射学随访患者进行回顾性评价。通过肩部AP片评估结节愈合情况,并分析其在由LSA/DSA角度定义的“五边形”内的位置和建议的最大延长。结果:rater内分析发现LSA和DSA几乎完全一致。对五角大楼来说,该协议从温和到强硬。评分者间分析发现,LSA与DSA和五角大楼的一致性较好,而DSA与五角大楼的一致性较好。结论:LSA/DSA在肩关节骨性关节炎行RSA手术的患者中应用。在这种情况下,结节是完整的,并且没有出现肱骨骨折RSA所固有的某些并发症。此处研究的人群(骨折后的RSA)由于难以分析结节位置而产生解释偏差。证据等级:4级,回顾性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: IJO welcomes articles that contribute to Orthopaedic knowledge from India and overseas. We publish articles dealing with clinical orthopaedics and basic research in orthopaedic surgery. Articles are accepted only for exclusive publication in the Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. Previously published articles, articles which are in peer-reviewed electronic publications in other journals, are not accepted by the Journal. Published articles and illustrations become the property of the Journal. The copyright remains with the journal. Studies must be carried out in accordance with World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信