Excessive Dynamic Airway Collapse Severity Scoring System: A Call Out for an Overall Severity Determination.

IF 3.3 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
David Abia-Trujillo, Alejandra Yu Lee-Mateus, Daniel Hernandez-Rojas, Sai Priyanka Pulipaka, Juan C Garcia-Saucedo, Omran Saifi, Adnan Majid, Sebastian Fernandez-Bussy
{"title":"Excessive Dynamic Airway Collapse Severity Scoring System: A Call Out for an Overall Severity Determination.","authors":"David Abia-Trujillo,&nbsp;Alejandra Yu Lee-Mateus,&nbsp;Daniel Hernandez-Rojas,&nbsp;Sai Priyanka Pulipaka,&nbsp;Juan C Garcia-Saucedo,&nbsp;Omran Saifi,&nbsp;Adnan Majid,&nbsp;Sebastian Fernandez-Bussy","doi":"10.1097/LBR.0000000000000918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Severe excessive dynamic airway collapse (EDAC) is defined as airway narrowing due to posterior wall protrusion into the airway lumen, >90%. We aimed to establish an overall severity score to assess severe EDAC and the need for subsequent intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study of patients who underwent dynamic bronchoscopy for evaluation of expiratory central airway collapse between January 2019 and July 2021. A numerical value was given to each tracheobronchial segmental collapse: 0 points (<70%), 1 point (70% to 79%), 2 points (80% to 89%), and 3 points (>90%) to be added for an overall EDAC severity score per patient. We compared the score among patients who underwent stent trials (severe EDAC) and those who did not. Based on the receiver operating characteristics curve, a cutoff total score to predict severe EDAC was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred fifty-eight patients were included. Patients were divided into severe (n = 60) and nonsevere (n = 98) EDAC. A cutoff of 9 as the total score had a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 74% to predict severe EDAC, based on an area under the curve 0.888 (95% CI: 0.84, 0.93; P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our EDAC Severity Scoring System was able to discern between severe and nonsevere EDAC by an overall score cutoff of 9, with high sensitivity and specificity for predicting severe disease and the need for further intervention, in our institution.</p>","PeriodicalId":15268,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/LBR.0000000000000918","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Severe excessive dynamic airway collapse (EDAC) is defined as airway narrowing due to posterior wall protrusion into the airway lumen, >90%. We aimed to establish an overall severity score to assess severe EDAC and the need for subsequent intervention.

Methods: A retrospective study of patients who underwent dynamic bronchoscopy for evaluation of expiratory central airway collapse between January 2019 and July 2021. A numerical value was given to each tracheobronchial segmental collapse: 0 points (<70%), 1 point (70% to 79%), 2 points (80% to 89%), and 3 points (>90%) to be added for an overall EDAC severity score per patient. We compared the score among patients who underwent stent trials (severe EDAC) and those who did not. Based on the receiver operating characteristics curve, a cutoff total score to predict severe EDAC was calculated.

Results: One hundred fifty-eight patients were included. Patients were divided into severe (n = 60) and nonsevere (n = 98) EDAC. A cutoff of 9 as the total score had a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 74% to predict severe EDAC, based on an area under the curve 0.888 (95% CI: 0.84, 0.93; P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Our EDAC Severity Scoring System was able to discern between severe and nonsevere EDAC by an overall score cutoff of 9, with high sensitivity and specificity for predicting severe disease and the need for further intervention, in our institution.

过度动态气道塌陷严重程度评分系统:全面确定严重程度的呼吁。
背景:严重过度动态气道塌陷(EDAC)是指由于后壁突出进入气道管腔而导致的气道狭窄,>90%。我们旨在建立一个总体严重程度评分,以评估严重的EDAC和后续干预的必要性。方法:对2019年1月至2021年7月期间接受动态支气管镜检查评估呼气中心气道塌陷的患者进行回顾性研究。每个气管支气管节段性塌陷都有一个数值:每个患者的EDAC严重程度总分加0分(90%)。我们比较了接受支架试验(严重EDAC)和未接受支架试验的患者的评分。基于受试者工作特性曲线,计算了预测严重EDAC的临界总分。结果:纳入158例患者。将患者分为严重(n=60)和非严重(n=98)EDAC。基于曲线下面积0.888(95%CI:0.84,0.93;P<0.001),总得分为9的临界值预测严重EDAC的敏感性为94%,特异性为74%。结论:我们的EDAC严重性评分系统能够通过9的总得分临界值区分严重和非严重EDAC,在我们的机构中,具有预测严重疾病的高灵敏度和特异性,并且需要进一步干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
121
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信