Two-Point Discrimination in Feet with Ankle Sprains.

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Hacı Ali Olcar, Ökkeş H Miniksar, Berna Güngör, Tolgahan Kuru, Enes E Kapukaya, Davut Aydın, Murat Korkmaz
{"title":"Two-Point Discrimination in Feet with Ankle Sprains.","authors":"Hacı Ali Olcar, Ökkeş H Miniksar, Berna Güngör, Tolgahan Kuru, Enes E Kapukaya, Davut Aydın, Murat Korkmaz","doi":"10.7547/22-192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to compare two-point discrimination in feet with ankle sprains and feet without ankle problems, and to determine whether there was a change in the two-point discrimination values in ankle sprains.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 108 people were included in the study. These subjects were aged between 18 and 40 years and visited the Medical Faculty of Yozgat Bozok University for various reasons in July and September of 2022. These people were divided into two groups: subjects with an ankle sprain and subjects with no ankle problems. Two-point discrimination values measured in millimeters were recorded for both groups using a caliper (esthesiometer) used in six regions of 216 feet. The two-point discrimination threshold values of the feet were compared statistically according to feet with ankle sprains and feet without ankle problems, and in right and left feet.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study determined that the two-point discrimination threshold values measured at the first toe tip, heel, third plantar metatarsal head, medial malleolus, and lateral malleolus in subjects with an ankle sprain was higher than in subjects with no ankle problems. When comparing both feet of the subjects with an ankle sprain, the two-point discrimination threshold value in the heel of the foot with an ankle sprain was higher than in the heel of the foot without ankle problems.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The two-point discrimination threshold value was higher in subjects with an ankle sprain than in subjects with no ankle problems. The data suggest that the two-point discrimination threshold may be higher in people with an ankle sprain. Further studies are needed to better understand the two-point discrimination threshold in ankle sprains.</p>","PeriodicalId":17241,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7547/22-192","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to compare two-point discrimination in feet with ankle sprains and feet without ankle problems, and to determine whether there was a change in the two-point discrimination values in ankle sprains.

Methods: A total of 108 people were included in the study. These subjects were aged between 18 and 40 years and visited the Medical Faculty of Yozgat Bozok University for various reasons in July and September of 2022. These people were divided into two groups: subjects with an ankle sprain and subjects with no ankle problems. Two-point discrimination values measured in millimeters were recorded for both groups using a caliper (esthesiometer) used in six regions of 216 feet. The two-point discrimination threshold values of the feet were compared statistically according to feet with ankle sprains and feet without ankle problems, and in right and left feet.

Results: The study determined that the two-point discrimination threshold values measured at the first toe tip, heel, third plantar metatarsal head, medial malleolus, and lateral malleolus in subjects with an ankle sprain was higher than in subjects with no ankle problems. When comparing both feet of the subjects with an ankle sprain, the two-point discrimination threshold value in the heel of the foot with an ankle sprain was higher than in the heel of the foot without ankle problems.

Conclusions: The two-point discrimination threshold value was higher in subjects with an ankle sprain than in subjects with no ankle problems. The data suggest that the two-point discrimination threshold may be higher in people with an ankle sprain. Further studies are needed to better understand the two-point discrimination threshold in ankle sprains.

踝关节扭伤患足的两点辨别能力
研究背景本研究旨在比较踝关节扭伤者和无踝关节问题者的两点辨别力,并确定踝关节扭伤者的两点辨别力值是否有变化:研究共纳入 108 人。这些受试者年龄在 18 岁至 40 岁之间,于 2022 年 7 月至 9 月间因各种原因前往约兹加特博佐克大学医学院就诊。这些人被分为两组:踝关节扭伤的受试者和没有踝关节问题的受试者。在 216 只脚的六个区域使用卡尺(ESTHESI计)记录两组受试者的两点辨别值(以毫米为单位)。根据踝关节扭伤的脚和没有踝关节问题的脚,以及右脚和左脚,对脚部的两点辨别阈值进行了统计比较:研究结果表明,踝关节扭伤受试者在第一趾尖、足跟、第三跖骨头、内侧踝骨和外侧踝骨处测量的两点辨别阈值高于没有踝关节问题的受试者。在比较踝关节扭伤受试者的双脚时,踝关节扭伤受试者脚跟的两点辨别阈值高于无踝关节问题受试者的脚跟:结论:有踝关节扭伤的受试者的两点辨别阈值高于没有踝关节问题的受试者。这些数据表明,踝关节扭伤患者的两点辨别阈值可能更高。要更好地了解踝关节扭伤患者的两点辨别阈值,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, the official journal of the Association, is the oldest and most frequently cited peer-reviewed journal in the profession of foot and ankle medicine. Founded in 1907 and appearing 6 times per year, it publishes research studies, case reports, literature reviews, special communications, clinical correspondence, letters to the editor, book reviews, and various other types of submissions. The Journal is included in major indexing and abstracting services for biomedical literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信