Reliability and measurement properties of upper cervical flexion-extension range of motion testing in people with cervicogenic headache and asymptomatic controls.

IF 1.6 Q2 REHABILITATION
Kiran Satpute, Rashi Rathod, Toby Hall
{"title":"Reliability and measurement properties of upper cervical flexion-extension range of motion testing in people with cervicogenic headache and asymptomatic controls.","authors":"Kiran Satpute, Rashi Rathod, Toby Hall","doi":"10.1080/10669817.2023.2251869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective was to determine reliability of sagittal plane range of motion (ROM) assessment in a healthy population and in people with cervicogenic headache (CGH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Upper cervical flexion/extension ROM was measured using an iPhone magnetometer sensor and retraction/protraction ROM measured by linear displacement. Two independent raters evaluated these movements in 33 subjects with CGH and 33 age and gender matched asymptomatic healthy controls on two occasions. Measurement procedures were standardized; and the order of testing randomized. Reliability, standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimum detectable change (MDC) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Subjects comprised 30 females and 36 males. The iPhone method demonstrated high reliability (ICC >0.82) with SEM values ranging from 0.62 to 1.0 and MDC values ranging from 1.70 to 4.81 respectively. Evaluation of linear displacement demonstrated moderate reliability (ICC >64). with SEM values ranging from 0.38 to 1.91 and MDC values ranging from 1.05 to 1.63 respectively. Compared to healthy controls, upper cervical flexion, retraction and protraction ROM was significantly less in the CGH group with mean difference of 6.50°, 1.52 cm and 2.34 cm respectively.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Upper cervical spine sagittal plane ROM can be measured with moderate to high reliability and was found to be more restricted in people with CGH.</p>","PeriodicalId":47319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"182-189"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10956903/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2023.2251869","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective was to determine reliability of sagittal plane range of motion (ROM) assessment in a healthy population and in people with cervicogenic headache (CGH).

Methods: Upper cervical flexion/extension ROM was measured using an iPhone magnetometer sensor and retraction/protraction ROM measured by linear displacement. Two independent raters evaluated these movements in 33 subjects with CGH and 33 age and gender matched asymptomatic healthy controls on two occasions. Measurement procedures were standardized; and the order of testing randomized. Reliability, standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimum detectable change (MDC) were calculated.

Results: Subjects comprised 30 females and 36 males. The iPhone method demonstrated high reliability (ICC >0.82) with SEM values ranging from 0.62 to 1.0 and MDC values ranging from 1.70 to 4.81 respectively. Evaluation of linear displacement demonstrated moderate reliability (ICC >64). with SEM values ranging from 0.38 to 1.91 and MDC values ranging from 1.05 to 1.63 respectively. Compared to healthy controls, upper cervical flexion, retraction and protraction ROM was significantly less in the CGH group with mean difference of 6.50°, 1.52 cm and 2.34 cm respectively.

Discussion: Upper cervical spine sagittal plane ROM can be measured with moderate to high reliability and was found to be more restricted in people with CGH.

颈源性头痛患者和无症状对照组上颈椎屈伸运动范围测试的可靠性和测量特性。
目的:旨在确定健康人群和颈源性头痛患者矢状面运动范围(ROM)评估的可靠性:目的是确定健康人群和颈源性头痛(CGH)患者矢状面运动范围(ROM)评估的可靠性:方法:使用 iPhone 磁力计传感器测量上颈椎屈/伸活动度,通过线性位移测量缩/伸活动度。两名独立评分员对 33 名 CGH 受试者和 33 名年龄和性别匹配的无症状健康对照者的这些运动进行了两次评估。测量程序标准化,测试顺序随机。结果:受试者包括 30 名女性和 36 名男性。iPhone 方法显示出较高的可靠性(ICC >0.82),SEM 值从 0.62 到 1.0 不等,MDC 值从 1.70 到 4.81 不等。线性位移评估显示出中等可靠性(ICC >64),SEM 值范围为 0.38 至 1.91,MDC 值范围为 1.05 至 1.63。与健康对照组相比,CGH组的上颈椎屈曲、回缩和前伸ROM明显减少,平均差异分别为6.50°、1.52厘米和2.34厘米:讨论:上颈椎矢状面ROM的测量结果具有中度到高度的可靠性,但发现CGH患者的上颈椎矢状面ROM受到更多限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the publication of original research, case reports, and reviews of the literature that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of manual therapy, clinical research, therapeutic practice, and academic training. In addition, each issue features an editorial written by the editor or a guest editor, media reviews, thesis reviews, and abstracts of current literature. Areas of interest include: •Thrust and non-thrust manipulation •Neurodynamic assessment and treatment •Diagnostic accuracy and classification •Manual therapy-related interventions •Clinical decision-making processes •Understanding clinimetrics for the clinician
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信