Why do distractions sometimes aid self-control? Pigeons (Columba livia) highlight possible mechanisms underlying the distraction effect.

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Michael J Beran
{"title":"Why do distractions sometimes aid self-control? Pigeons (Columba livia) highlight possible mechanisms underlying the distraction effect.","authors":"Michael J Beran","doi":"10.1037/com0000363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this essay, the author explores the question of why distractions sometimes aid self-control. In a study with chimpanzees, Evans and Beran (2007) used two conditions with toys to address the possibility raised by Mueller et al. (2023) about toys as distractors. In the first, the accumulating rewards were within reach, and so chimpanzees had to inhibit taking rewards if more were to accumulate. The second condition was essential to this issue, as in that case toys also were available, but the delayed reward was out of reach (i.e., the chimpanzees were forced to wait to get the delayed reward). Because these trial types were intermixed, an explanation of the toys' effectiveness through conditioned association with the delayed reward would predict that the chimpanzees should have engaged the toys equally often in both conditions. However, three of four chimpanzees engaged the toys more when the accumulating reward was within reach compared to when it was not. Evans and Beran suggested that engagement with distractors in that study occurred when it was functionally effective in aiding delayed gratification, not solely as a result of toys being associated with delayed rewards, and thus was a cognitively controlled decision by the chimpanzees. The results of Evans and Beran (2007) have yet to be replicated in any other primate species. But, Mueller et al. (2023) noted that a study with a parrot (Koepke et al., 2015) showed that the parrot would use distractors and even move the smaller, sooner reward away from itself, perhaps matching the self-distraction techniques of children who hide their faces or talk to themselves. Thus, it remains to be determined whether those behaviors also can be explained by learned associations with reward or whether they reflect attention-based explanations. Mueller et al. (2023) have provided a creative experiment and a compelling argument that more careful analysis is needed of exactly what happens when an animal (or child) engages distractors and shows improved self-control, so that we can understand what role past reinforcement history may play and what possible attentional strategies or other cognitive strategies are at work in different self-control tasks. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000363","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this essay, the author explores the question of why distractions sometimes aid self-control. In a study with chimpanzees, Evans and Beran (2007) used two conditions with toys to address the possibility raised by Mueller et al. (2023) about toys as distractors. In the first, the accumulating rewards were within reach, and so chimpanzees had to inhibit taking rewards if more were to accumulate. The second condition was essential to this issue, as in that case toys also were available, but the delayed reward was out of reach (i.e., the chimpanzees were forced to wait to get the delayed reward). Because these trial types were intermixed, an explanation of the toys' effectiveness through conditioned association with the delayed reward would predict that the chimpanzees should have engaged the toys equally often in both conditions. However, three of four chimpanzees engaged the toys more when the accumulating reward was within reach compared to when it was not. Evans and Beran suggested that engagement with distractors in that study occurred when it was functionally effective in aiding delayed gratification, not solely as a result of toys being associated with delayed rewards, and thus was a cognitively controlled decision by the chimpanzees. The results of Evans and Beran (2007) have yet to be replicated in any other primate species. But, Mueller et al. (2023) noted that a study with a parrot (Koepke et al., 2015) showed that the parrot would use distractors and even move the smaller, sooner reward away from itself, perhaps matching the self-distraction techniques of children who hide their faces or talk to themselves. Thus, it remains to be determined whether those behaviors also can be explained by learned associations with reward or whether they reflect attention-based explanations. Mueller et al. (2023) have provided a creative experiment and a compelling argument that more careful analysis is needed of exactly what happens when an animal (or child) engages distractors and shows improved self-control, so that we can understand what role past reinforcement history may play and what possible attentional strategies or other cognitive strategies are at work in different self-control tasks. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

为什么分心有时有助于自我控制?鸽子(Columba livia)强调了分心效应的可能机制。
在这篇文章中,作者探讨了为什么分散注意力有时有助于自我控制的问题。在对黑猩猩的研究中,埃文斯和贝兰(2007 年)使用了两种玩具条件来解决穆勒等人(2023 年)提出的玩具作为分心物的可能性。在第一种情况下,不断累积的奖励触手可及,因此黑猩猩必须在更多奖励累积时抑制拿走奖励。第二种情况对这一问题至关重要,因为在这种情况下,玩具也是可用的,但延迟奖励却遥不可及(即黑猩猩被迫等待获得延迟奖励)。由于这些试验类型是混合在一起的,如果通过延迟奖励的条件联想来解释玩具的有效性,那么黑猩猩在这两种情况下使用玩具的频率应该是相同的。然而,四只黑猩猩中有三只在累积奖赏触手可及时比触及不到时更多地使用玩具。埃文斯和贝兰认为,在该研究中,当玩具在功能上有效地帮助延迟满足时,黑猩猩才会使用分散注意力的玩具,而不仅仅是因为玩具与延迟奖励相关联,因此这是黑猩猩在认知控制下做出的决定。埃文斯和贝兰(2007 年)的研究结果尚未在其他灵长类动物身上得到验证。但是,Mueller 等人(2023 年)指出,一项对鹦鹉的研究(Koepke 等人,2015 年)表明,鹦鹉会使用分散注意力的方法,甚至会将较小的、较快的奖励从自己身边移开,这可能与隐藏自己的脸或自言自语的儿童的自我分散技术相吻合。因此,这些行为是否也可以用学习到的奖励联想来解释,或者它们是否反映了基于注意力的解释,还有待确定。穆勒等人(2023 年)提供了一个创造性的实验和一个令人信服的论据,即我们需要更仔细地分析当动物(或儿童)与分心物接触并表现出更好的自我控制能力时到底会发生什么,这样我们才能了解过去的强化历史可能起什么作用,以及在不同的自我控制任务中可能有哪些注意策略或其他认知策略在起作用。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Comparative Psychology publishes original research from a comparative perspective on the behavior, cognition, perception, and social relationships of diverse species.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信