Serial evaluation of loop diuretic efficiency following left ventricular assist device implantation.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-30 DOI:10.1177/03913988231193446
Sarah M Beargie, Lindsey Tolbert, Robert K Tunney, Zachary L Cox, Wu Gong, Sandip Zalawadiya
{"title":"Serial evaluation of loop diuretic efficiency following left ventricular assist device implantation.","authors":"Sarah M Beargie,&nbsp;Lindsey Tolbert,&nbsp;Robert K Tunney,&nbsp;Zachary L Cox,&nbsp;Wu Gong,&nbsp;Sandip Zalawadiya","doi":"10.1177/03913988231193446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>More than 50% of heart failure (HF) patients require diuretic therapy after left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Although few data related to diuretic response (DR) exist in stage D patients, tubular sodium reabsorption may be clinically prognostic independent of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and proteinuria within this cohort. We aimed to characterize DR serially before and after LVAD implantation in a stage D population. We conducted a prospective, observational cohort study of HF patients receiving diuretics with plans to undergo LVAD implantation. We measured urine sodium (U<sub>Na</sub>) and creatinine (U<sub>Cr</sub>) at three points after diuretic therapy: pre-LVAD, post-LVAD prior to discharge, and as an outpatient. Prior to LVAD, patients (<i>N</i> = 19) had an average eGFR of 54.0 ± 18.0 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>, spot U<sub>Na</sub> of 74.8 ± 28.0 mmol/L, and fractional excretion of sodium (FE<sub>Na</sub>) of 3.1 ± 2.7%. Pre-LVAD, eGFR did not correlate with spot U<sub>Na</sub> nor FE<sub>Na</sub> (<i>p</i> > 0.05 for both). LVAD implantation did not improve DR post-LVAD (mean change FE<sub>Na</sub> per 40 mg IV furosemide 0.5 ± 1.0%; <i>p</i> = 0.84), and 90% of patients required loop diuretics at 90 days post-surgery. Improved hemodynamics following LVAD may not improve DR or tubular function; larger studies are needed to confirm our results and assess the utility of DR to predict post-LVAD outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03913988231193446","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

More than 50% of heart failure (HF) patients require diuretic therapy after left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Although few data related to diuretic response (DR) exist in stage D patients, tubular sodium reabsorption may be clinically prognostic independent of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and proteinuria within this cohort. We aimed to characterize DR serially before and after LVAD implantation in a stage D population. We conducted a prospective, observational cohort study of HF patients receiving diuretics with plans to undergo LVAD implantation. We measured urine sodium (UNa) and creatinine (UCr) at three points after diuretic therapy: pre-LVAD, post-LVAD prior to discharge, and as an outpatient. Prior to LVAD, patients (N = 19) had an average eGFR of 54.0 ± 18.0 mL/min/1.73 m2, spot UNa of 74.8 ± 28.0 mmol/L, and fractional excretion of sodium (FENa) of 3.1 ± 2.7%. Pre-LVAD, eGFR did not correlate with spot UNa nor FENa (p > 0.05 for both). LVAD implantation did not improve DR post-LVAD (mean change FENa per 40 mg IV furosemide 0.5 ± 1.0%; p = 0.84), and 90% of patients required loop diuretics at 90 days post-surgery. Improved hemodynamics following LVAD may not improve DR or tubular function; larger studies are needed to confirm our results and assess the utility of DR to predict post-LVAD outcomes.

左室辅助装置植入后循环利尿效果的系列评价。
超过50%的心力衰竭(HF)患者在使用左心室辅助装置(LVAD)后需要利尿剂治疗。尽管在D期患者中很少有与利尿反应(DR)相关的数据,但在该队列中,肾小管钠重吸收可能是独立于估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)和蛋白尿的临床预后。我们的目的是在D期人群中LVAD植入前后连续表征DR。我们对接受利尿剂并计划进行LVAD植入的HF患者进行了前瞻性、观察性队列研究。我们在利尿剂治疗后的三个点测量了尿钠(UNa)和肌酐(UCr):LVAD前、LVAD后出院前和门诊时。LVAD之前,患者(N = 19) 平均eGFR为54.0 ± 18 毫升/分钟/1.73 m2,点UNa为74.8 ± 28 mmol/L,钠排泄分数(FENa)为3.1 ± 2.7%。LVAD前,eGFR与斑点UNa和FENa均无相关性(p > 两者均为0.05)。LVAD植入术并没有改善LVAD后的DR(平均每40分钟变化FENa mg静脉注射呋塞米0.5 ± 1.0%;p = 0.84),90%的患者在90岁时需要环路利尿剂 手术后几天。LVAD后血流动力学的改善可能不会改善DR或肾小管功能;需要更大规模的研究来证实我们的结果,并评估DR在预测LVAD后结果方面的效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信