Tele-mental Health Transitions for Pennsylvania Coordinated Specialty Care Programs for Early Psychosis During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Fanghong Dong, Megan B E Jumper, Emily M Becker-Haimes, Crystal Vatza, Lucille Lucy Miao, Catherine Conroy, Melanie Bennett, Deepak K Sarpal, Courtney Abegunde, Christian G Kohler, Monica E Calkins
{"title":"Tele-mental Health Transitions for Pennsylvania Coordinated Specialty Care Programs for Early Psychosis During the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Fanghong Dong,&nbsp;Megan B E Jumper,&nbsp;Emily M Becker-Haimes,&nbsp;Crystal Vatza,&nbsp;Lucille Lucy Miao,&nbsp;Catherine Conroy,&nbsp;Melanie Bennett,&nbsp;Deepak K Sarpal,&nbsp;Courtney Abegunde,&nbsp;Christian G Kohler,&nbsp;Monica E Calkins","doi":"10.1007/s11126-023-10015-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined provider and client perspectives of tele-mental health (TMH) in early psychosis care during the COVID-19 pandemic. To achieve this goal, thirty-three mental health providers and 31 clients from Pennsylvania Coordinated Specialty Care (CSC) programs completed web-based surveys assessing TMH usage, experiences, and perceptions between May and September 2020. Three additional TMH-related questions were asked two years later of PA CSC Program Directors between Feb and March 2022. Descriptive statistics characterized responses. Open-ended items were coded and grouped into themes for qualitative synthesis. As early as mid-2020, participants reported extensive use of TMH technologies, including telephone and video visits. Although most providers and clients preferred in-person care to TMH, most clients still found TMH to be comparable to or better than in-person care; 94% of clients indicated interest in future TMH services. Providers also noted more successes than challenges with TMH. Nine themes emerged regarding provider-perceived client characteristics that could benefit from TMH and were grouped into two categories: client-level (access to technology, comfort with technology, transportation, young age, symptom severity, functioning level, motivation for treatment adherence) and interpersonal-level (external support systems and engagement with program prior to the pandemic) characteristics. Two years later, program directors reported continued perceived advantages of TMH in CSCs, although some barriers persisted. Despite the unexpected shift to TMH in early psychosis programs during the COVID-19 pandemic, findings indicated a relatively positive transition to TMH and perceived promise of TMH as a sustained part of routine care.</p>","PeriodicalId":20658,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric Quarterly","volume":"94 2","pages":"89-102"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9947877/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-023-10015-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study examined provider and client perspectives of tele-mental health (TMH) in early psychosis care during the COVID-19 pandemic. To achieve this goal, thirty-three mental health providers and 31 clients from Pennsylvania Coordinated Specialty Care (CSC) programs completed web-based surveys assessing TMH usage, experiences, and perceptions between May and September 2020. Three additional TMH-related questions were asked two years later of PA CSC Program Directors between Feb and March 2022. Descriptive statistics characterized responses. Open-ended items were coded and grouped into themes for qualitative synthesis. As early as mid-2020, participants reported extensive use of TMH technologies, including telephone and video visits. Although most providers and clients preferred in-person care to TMH, most clients still found TMH to be comparable to or better than in-person care; 94% of clients indicated interest in future TMH services. Providers also noted more successes than challenges with TMH. Nine themes emerged regarding provider-perceived client characteristics that could benefit from TMH and were grouped into two categories: client-level (access to technology, comfort with technology, transportation, young age, symptom severity, functioning level, motivation for treatment adherence) and interpersonal-level (external support systems and engagement with program prior to the pandemic) characteristics. Two years later, program directors reported continued perceived advantages of TMH in CSCs, although some barriers persisted. Despite the unexpected shift to TMH in early psychosis programs during the COVID-19 pandemic, findings indicated a relatively positive transition to TMH and perceived promise of TMH as a sustained part of routine care.

Abstract Image

宾夕法尼亚州在COVID-19大流行期间协调早期精神病专业护理计划的远程心理健康过渡。
本研究考察了COVID-19大流行期间早期精神病护理中远程心理健康(TMH)的提供者和客户观点。为了实现这一目标,来自宾夕法尼亚州协调专业护理(CSC)项目的33名心理健康提供者和31名客户完成了基于网络的调查,评估了2020年5月至9月期间TMH的使用、体验和看法。两年后,在2022年2月至3月期间,对PA CSC项目主管提出了另外三个与tmh相关的问题。描述性统计描述了反应。开放式项目被编码并归类为主题进行定性综合。早在2020年年中,与会者就报告了TMH技术的广泛使用,包括电话和视频访问。虽然大多数提供者和客户更倾向于面对面护理,但大多数客户仍然认为面对面护理与面对面护理相当或更好;94%的客户表示对未来的TMH服务感兴趣。供应商也注意到TMH的成功多于挑战。关于提供者感知的可从TMH获益的客户特征,出现了9个主题,并将其分为两类:客户层面(获得技术、技术舒适度、交通、年轻、症状严重程度、功能水平、坚持治疗的动机)和人际层面(外部支持系统和大流行前参与规划)特征。两年后,项目主管报告称,尽管存在一些障碍,但在CSCs中,TMH仍然具有明显的优势。尽管在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,早期精神病项目出人意料地转向了TMH,但研究结果表明,向TMH的转变相对积极,并认为TMH有望成为常规护理的持续一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychiatric Quarterly
Psychiatric Quarterly PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Psychiatric Quarterly publishes original research, theoretical papers, and review articles on the assessment, treatment, and rehabilitation of persons with psychiatric disabilities, with emphasis on care provided in public, community, and private institutional settings such as hospitals, schools, and correctional facilities. Qualitative and quantitative studies concerning the social, clinical, administrative, legal, political, and ethical aspects of mental health care fall within the scope of the journal. Content areas include, but are not limited to, evidence-based practice in prevention, diagnosis, and management of psychiatric disorders; interface of psychiatry with primary and specialty medicine; disparities of access and outcomes in health care service delivery; and socio-cultural and cross-cultural aspects of mental health and wellness, including mental health literacy. 5 Year Impact Factor: 1.023 (2007) Section ''Psychiatry'': Rank 70 out of 82
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信