Achieving high union rates after first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis: Radiographic outcomes and technical pitfalls.

IF 2 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Christian von Deimling, Timo Tondelli, Samuel Brunner, Octavian Andronic, Alexander David Graf
{"title":"Achieving high union rates after first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis: Radiographic outcomes and technical pitfalls.","authors":"Christian von Deimling,&nbsp;Timo Tondelli,&nbsp;Samuel Brunner,&nbsp;Octavian Andronic,&nbsp;Alexander David Graf","doi":"10.5312/wjo.v14.i6.436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fusion of the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP1) joint is a common surgery performed to correct hallux rigidus, hallux rigidus et valgus and other painful degenerative diseases of the MTP1.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess outcomes of our surgical technique including non-union rates, accuracy and aims of correction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between September 2011 and November 2020 a total 72 of MTP1 fusions were performed using a low profile, pre-contoured dorsal locking plate and a plantar compression screw. Union and revision rates were analyzed with a minimum clinical and radiological follow up of at least 3 mo (range 3-18 mo). The following parameters were evaluated on pre- and postoperative conventional radiographs: Intermetatarsal angle, Hallux-valgus angle, dorsal extension of the proximal phalanx (P1) in relation to the floor and the angle between the Metatarsal 1 and the P1 (MT1-P1 angle). Descriptive statistical analysis was performed. Pearson analysis was used to assess for correlations between radiographic parameters and achievement of fusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An overall union rate of 98.6% (71/72) was achieved. Two out of 72 patients did not primarily fuse with one patient suffering from a non-union, whilst the other demonstrating a radiological delayed union without clinical symptoms, with eventually complete fusion after 18 mo. There was no correlation between the measured radiographic parameters and the achievement of fusion. We believe the reason for the non-union was mainly attributed to the patient's incompliance without wearing the therapeutic shoe leading to a fracture of the P1. Furthermore, we didn`t find any correlation between fusion and the degree of correction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>With our surgical technique, high union rates (98%) can be achieved using a compression screw and a dorsal variable-angle locking plate to treat degenerative diseases of the MTP1.</p>","PeriodicalId":47843,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Orthopedics","volume":"14 6","pages":"436-442"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1c/e5/WJO-14-436.PMC10292060.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v14.i6.436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fusion of the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP1) joint is a common surgery performed to correct hallux rigidus, hallux rigidus et valgus and other painful degenerative diseases of the MTP1.

Aim: To assess outcomes of our surgical technique including non-union rates, accuracy and aims of correction.

Methods: Between September 2011 and November 2020 a total 72 of MTP1 fusions were performed using a low profile, pre-contoured dorsal locking plate and a plantar compression screw. Union and revision rates were analyzed with a minimum clinical and radiological follow up of at least 3 mo (range 3-18 mo). The following parameters were evaluated on pre- and postoperative conventional radiographs: Intermetatarsal angle, Hallux-valgus angle, dorsal extension of the proximal phalanx (P1) in relation to the floor and the angle between the Metatarsal 1 and the P1 (MT1-P1 angle). Descriptive statistical analysis was performed. Pearson analysis was used to assess for correlations between radiographic parameters and achievement of fusion.

Results: An overall union rate of 98.6% (71/72) was achieved. Two out of 72 patients did not primarily fuse with one patient suffering from a non-union, whilst the other demonstrating a radiological delayed union without clinical symptoms, with eventually complete fusion after 18 mo. There was no correlation between the measured radiographic parameters and the achievement of fusion. We believe the reason for the non-union was mainly attributed to the patient's incompliance without wearing the therapeutic shoe leading to a fracture of the P1. Furthermore, we didn`t find any correlation between fusion and the degree of correction.

Conclusion: With our surgical technique, high union rates (98%) can be achieved using a compression screw and a dorsal variable-angle locking plate to treat degenerative diseases of the MTP1.

Abstract Image

首次跖趾关节融合术后的高愈合率:影像学结果和技术缺陷。
背景:第一跖趾(MTP1)关节融合术是一种常见的矫正拇趾僵硬、拇趾僵硬及外翻等MTP1退行性疾病的手术。目的:评估我们的手术技术的效果,包括不愈合率、准确性和矫正目的。方法:在2011年9月至2020年11月期间,使用低轮廓、预轮廓背侧锁定钢板和足底加压螺钉共进行72例MTP1融合。通过至少3个月(3-18个月)的临床和放射学随访,分析愈合率和修复率。在术前和术后常规x线片上评估以下参数:跖间角、拇外翻角、近端指骨(P1)相对于底的背伸以及跖骨1与P1之间的角度(MT1-P1角)。进行描述性统计分析。Pearson分析用于评估影像学参数与融合效果之间的相关性。结果:总融合率为98.6%(71/72)。72例患者中有2例未进行初步融合,其中1例出现骨不愈合,而另1例显示放射学延迟愈合,无临床症状,在18个月后最终完全融合。测量的放射学参数与融合的实现之间没有相关性。我们认为不愈合的原因主要是由于患者不遵守治疗鞋而导致P1骨折。此外,我们没有发现融合和矫正程度之间的任何相关性。结论:采用我们的手术技术,使用加压螺钉和背侧可变角度锁定钢板治疗MTP1退行性疾病,愈合率可达98%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
814
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信