Gender differences in factors related to eating competence in college students: Weight-and-body shame and guilt, weight satisfaction, weight loss effort, and eating disorder risk

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Cristen L. Harris , Kaitlin Benjamin , Zhen Miao , Jordyn Fantuzzi , Michelle Averill
{"title":"Gender differences in factors related to eating competence in college students: Weight-and-body shame and guilt, weight satisfaction, weight loss effort, and eating disorder risk","authors":"Cristen L. Harris ,&nbsp;Kaitlin Benjamin ,&nbsp;Zhen Miao ,&nbsp;Jordyn Fantuzzi ,&nbsp;Michelle Averill","doi":"10.1016/j.eatbeh.2023.101797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This study aimed to determine which weight-and-body-related attitudes and behaviors were most predictive of Eating Competence (EC) in college students amidst COVID-19, according to gender.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>This cross-sectional study was part of a larger study in which an online survey was administered during autumn quarter 2020 to undergraduate students at a northwestern U.S. public university. Measures included EC (ecSI 2.0™), weight-and-body shame and/or guilt (WEB</span><img><span>SG), weight satisfaction, current weight loss effort, and eating disorder risk.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 1996 respondents included in the final analyses, 40.2 % were eating competent (ecSI 2.0™ ≥32). Gender distribution was 71.6 % women, 23.1 % men, and 4.6 % trans-and-gender non-conforming (TGNC). WEB<img>SG and WEB-S were higher in women and TGNC than in men. Weight satisfaction was lower in women and TGNC students than men, and 47.3 % of the sample was trying to lose weight at the time of the study. Eating disorder (ED) risk was prevalent with nearly 34 % scoring ≥2 on SCOFF and 33 % reporting they saw themselves as having an ED now or in the past. Significant factors of EC varied for each gender, although WEB-S was a shared model factor for all genders.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>EC may be protective, as this was related to less WEB-S in all genders; less WEB-G and greater weight satisfaction in men and women; and lower likelihood of ED risk and trying to lose weight among women. Further research is needed to elucidate whether these maladaptive weight-and-body attitudes and behaviors in college students can be improved to increase EC.</p></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><p><strong>Level V</strong>, descriptive cross-sectional study.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11476,"journal":{"name":"Eating behaviors","volume":"51 ","pages":"Article 101797"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eating behaviors","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471015323000971","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to determine which weight-and-body-related attitudes and behaviors were most predictive of Eating Competence (EC) in college students amidst COVID-19, according to gender.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was part of a larger study in which an online survey was administered during autumn quarter 2020 to undergraduate students at a northwestern U.S. public university. Measures included EC (ecSI 2.0™), weight-and-body shame and/or guilt (WEBSG), weight satisfaction, current weight loss effort, and eating disorder risk.

Results

Of the 1996 respondents included in the final analyses, 40.2 % were eating competent (ecSI 2.0™ ≥32). Gender distribution was 71.6 % women, 23.1 % men, and 4.6 % trans-and-gender non-conforming (TGNC). WEBSG and WEB-S were higher in women and TGNC than in men. Weight satisfaction was lower in women and TGNC students than men, and 47.3 % of the sample was trying to lose weight at the time of the study. Eating disorder (ED) risk was prevalent with nearly 34 % scoring ≥2 on SCOFF and 33 % reporting they saw themselves as having an ED now or in the past. Significant factors of EC varied for each gender, although WEB-S was a shared model factor for all genders.

Conclusion

EC may be protective, as this was related to less WEB-S in all genders; less WEB-G and greater weight satisfaction in men and women; and lower likelihood of ED risk and trying to lose weight among women. Further research is needed to elucidate whether these maladaptive weight-and-body attitudes and behaviors in college students can be improved to increase EC.

Level of evidence

Level V, descriptive cross-sectional study.

大学生饮食能力相关因素的性别差异:体重和身体羞耻感、内疚感、体重满意度、减肥努力和饮食障碍风险
目的本研究旨在确定新冠肺炎大学生中哪些与体重和身体相关的态度和行为最能预测饮食能力(EC)。方法这项横断面研究是一项更大规模研究的一部分,该研究在2020年秋季对美国西北部一所公立大学的本科生进行了在线调查。措施包括EC(ecSI 2.0™), 体重和身体羞耻感和/或内疚感(WEBSG)、体重满意度、当前的减肥努力和饮食失调风险。结果在纳入最终分析的1996名受访者中,40.2%的人饮食能力良好(ecSI 2.0™ ≥32)。性别分布为女性71.6%,男性23.1%,跨性别和性别不合(TGNC)4.6%。女性和TGNC的WEBSG和WEB-S高于男性。女性和TGNC学生的体重满意度低于男性,研究时47.3%的样本试图减肥。饮食障碍(ED)风险普遍存在,近34%的人在SCOFF上得分≥2,33%的人表示他们认为自己现在或过去患有ED。EC的显著因素因性别而异,尽管WEB-S是所有性别的共同模型因素。结论EC可能具有保护作用,因为这与所有性别的WEB-S较少有关;男性和女性的WEB-G更少,体重满意度更高;女性患ED风险和试图减肥的可能性较低。需要进一步的研究来阐明是否可以改善大学生的这些不适应的体重和身体态度和行为,以提高EC。证据水平五级,描述性横断面研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Eating behaviors
Eating behaviors Multiple-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
3.60%
发文量
65
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Eating Behaviors is an international peer-reviewed scientific journal publishing human research on the etiology, prevention, and treatment of obesity, binge eating, and eating disorders in adults and children. Studies related to the promotion of healthy eating patterns to treat or prevent medical conditions (e.g., hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cancer) are also acceptable. Two types of manuscripts are encouraged: (1) Descriptive studies establishing functional relationships between eating behaviors and social, cognitive, environmental, attitudinal, emotional or biochemical factors; (2) Clinical outcome research evaluating the efficacy of prevention or treatment protocols.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信