Restenosis Following Bronchoscopic Airway Stenting for Complex Tracheal Stenosis.

IF 3.3 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Ara A Chrissian, Javier Diaz-Mendoza, Michael J Simoff
{"title":"Restenosis Following Bronchoscopic Airway Stenting for Complex Tracheal Stenosis.","authors":"Ara A Chrissian,&nbsp;Javier Diaz-Mendoza,&nbsp;Michael J Simoff","doi":"10.1097/LBR.0000000000000878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nonsurgical patients with complex postintubation tracheal stenosis (PITS) and tracheostomy-associated tracheal stenosis (PTTS) often require airway stenting. However, the optimal approach is unknown. Identifying patients at higher risk for restenosis after stent removal may allow the treating physician to individualize the vigilance and duration of airway stenting, and help optimize outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on all patients with complex PITS and/or PTTS treated with protocolized bronchoscopic airway stenting over a consecutive 16-year period. The primary outcome analyzed was restenosis rate at 1 year after stent removal. Predictors for restenosis and factors influencing risk for death during stent therapy were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 181 subjects treated with silicone airway stenting, 128 were available for analysis of the primary outcome. Restenosis by 1 year after stent removal occurred in 58%. Independent predictors for restenosis were coexisting diabetes [odd ratio (OR)=3.10, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.04-9.24; P =0.04], morbid obesity (OR=3.13, 95% CI=1.20-8.17; P =0.02), and occurrence of stent-associated complications requiring bronchoscopic management (OR=2.13, 95% CI=1.12-4.03; P =0.02). The overall mortality during the initial stenting period was 14%, and a silicone Y-stent was associated with a higher risk of death (OR=3.58, 95% CI=1.40-9.14; P =0.008).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tracheal restenosis after silicone stent therapy for complex PITS and PTTS is common and more likely to occur in patients with diabetes, morbid obesity, and frequent stent-associated complications. Mortality risk during stent therapy is not negligible, and a Y-stent should be utilized only after careful consideration. These findings may be incorporated into the approach to bronchoscopic airway stenting in these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15268,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/LBR.0000000000000878","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nonsurgical patients with complex postintubation tracheal stenosis (PITS) and tracheostomy-associated tracheal stenosis (PTTS) often require airway stenting. However, the optimal approach is unknown. Identifying patients at higher risk for restenosis after stent removal may allow the treating physician to individualize the vigilance and duration of airway stenting, and help optimize outcomes.

Methods: This was a single-center retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on all patients with complex PITS and/or PTTS treated with protocolized bronchoscopic airway stenting over a consecutive 16-year period. The primary outcome analyzed was restenosis rate at 1 year after stent removal. Predictors for restenosis and factors influencing risk for death during stent therapy were also assessed.

Results: Of the 181 subjects treated with silicone airway stenting, 128 were available for analysis of the primary outcome. Restenosis by 1 year after stent removal occurred in 58%. Independent predictors for restenosis were coexisting diabetes [odd ratio (OR)=3.10, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.04-9.24; P =0.04], morbid obesity (OR=3.13, 95% CI=1.20-8.17; P =0.02), and occurrence of stent-associated complications requiring bronchoscopic management (OR=2.13, 95% CI=1.12-4.03; P =0.02). The overall mortality during the initial stenting period was 14%, and a silicone Y-stent was associated with a higher risk of death (OR=3.58, 95% CI=1.40-9.14; P =0.008).

Conclusion: Tracheal restenosis after silicone stent therapy for complex PITS and PTTS is common and more likely to occur in patients with diabetes, morbid obesity, and frequent stent-associated complications. Mortality risk during stent therapy is not negligible, and a Y-stent should be utilized only after careful consideration. These findings may be incorporated into the approach to bronchoscopic airway stenting in these patients.

复杂气管狭窄的支气管镜气道支架置入术后再狭窄。
背景:患有复杂气管插管后狭窄(PITS)和气管造口术相关气管狭窄(PTTS)的非手术患者通常需要气道支架植入。然而,最佳方法尚不清楚。识别支架移除后再狭窄风险较高的患者可以让治疗医生对气道支架植入的警惕性和持续时间进行个性化处理,并有助于优化结果。方法:这是一项单中心回顾性分析,前瞻性收集了所有患有复杂PITS和/或PTTS的患者的数据,这些患者在连续16年的时间里接受了原发性支气管镜气道支架置入术。分析的主要结果是支架移除后1年的再狭窄率。还评估了支架治疗期间再狭窄的预测因素和影响死亡风险的因素。结果:181名接受硅胶气道支架置入治疗的受试者中,128人可用于分析主要结果。58%的患者在支架移除后1年内发生再狭窄。再狭窄的独立预测因素是共存糖尿病[奇数比(OR)=3.10,95%置信区间(CI)=1.04-9.24;P=0.04],病态肥胖(OR=3.13,95%CI=1.20-8.17;P=0.02),以及需要支气管镜治疗的支架相关并发症的发生率(OR=2.13,95%CI=1.12-4.03;P=0.02,并且硅胶Y型支架与更高的死亡风险相关(OR=3.58,95%CI=1.40-9.14;P=0.008)。支架治疗期间的死亡风险不容忽视,只有在仔细考虑后才能使用Y型支架。这些发现可能被纳入这些患者的支气管镜气道支架植入方法中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
121
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信