The Implementation of Nongynecologic Reporting Systems in Cytopathology Laboratories Is Highly Variable: Analysis of Data From a 2020 Supplemental Survey of Participants in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Nongynecologic Cytology.

IF 3.7 3区医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.5858/arpa.2023-0010-CP

Christopher J VandenBussche, Ann Nwosu, Rhona Souers, Kaitlin E Sundling, Jennifer Brainard, Abha Goyal, Xiaoqi Lin, Shala Masood, Lananh Nguyen, Janie Roberson, Sana O Tabbara, Christine Booth

{"title":"The Implementation of Nongynecologic Reporting Systems in Cytopathology Laboratories Is Highly Variable: Analysis of Data From a 2020 Supplemental Survey of Participants in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Nongynecologic Cytology.","authors":"Christopher J VandenBussche, Ann Nwosu, Rhona Souers, Kaitlin E Sundling, Jennifer Brainard, Abha Goyal, Xiaoqi Lin, Shala Masood, Lananh Nguyen, Janie Roberson, Sana O Tabbara, Christine Booth","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2023-0010-CP","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: In recent years, several reporting systems have been developed by national and international cytopathology organizations to standardize the evaluation of specific cytopathology specimen types.Objective: To assess the current implementation rates, implementation methods, and barriers to implementation of commonly used nongynecologic reporting systems in cytopathology laboratories.Design: Data were analyzed from a survey developed by the College of American Pathologists Cytopathology Committee and distributed to participants in the College of American Pathologists Nongynecologic Cytopathology Education Program mailing.Results: Nongynecologic reporting systems with the highest rate of adoption were the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology, 2nd edition (74.1%; 552 of 745); the Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology (53.9%; 397 of 736); and the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (29.1%; 200 of 688). The most common reason given for not adopting a reporting system was satisfaction with a laboratory's current system. Implementation varied among laboratories with regard to which stakeholders were involved in deciding to implement a system and the amount of education provided during the implementation process.Conclusions: The implementation of nongynecologic reporting systems in cytopathology laboratories was highly variable.","PeriodicalId":8305,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2023-0010-CP","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: In recent years, several reporting systems have been developed by national and international cytopathology organizations to standardize the evaluation of specific cytopathology specimen types.

Objective: To assess the current implementation rates, implementation methods, and barriers to implementation of commonly used nongynecologic reporting systems in cytopathology laboratories.

Design: Data were analyzed from a survey developed by the College of American Pathologists Cytopathology Committee and distributed to participants in the College of American Pathologists Nongynecologic Cytopathology Education Program mailing.

Results: Nongynecologic reporting systems with the highest rate of adoption were the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology, 2nd edition (74.1%; 552 of 745); the Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology (53.9%; 397 of 736); and the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (29.1%; 200 of 688). The most common reason given for not adopting a reporting system was satisfaction with a laboratory's current system. Implementation varied among laboratories with regard to which stakeholders were involved in deciding to implement a system and the amount of education provided during the implementation process.

Conclusions: The implementation of nongynecologic reporting systems in cytopathology laboratories was highly variable.

查看原文本刊更多论文

细胞病理学实验室非妇科报告系统的实施情况千差万别：美国病理学家学会非妇科细胞学实验室间比较计划 2020 年参与者补充调查数据分析》（College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Nongynecologic Cytology）。

背景：近年来，国内和国际细胞病理学组织开发了多种报告系统，以规范对特定细胞病理学标本类型的评估：目的：评估目前细胞病理学实验室常用的非妇科报告系统的实施率、实施方法和实施障碍：数据由美国病理学家学会细胞病理学委员会制定，并分发给美国病理学家学会非妇科细胞病理学教育计划邮件的参与者：非妇科细胞病理学报告系统采用率最高的是贝塞斯达甲状腺细胞病理学报告系统第 2 版（74.1%；745 例中的 552 例）、巴黎泌尿系统细胞病理学报告系统（53.9%；736 例中的 397 例）和米兰唾液腺细胞病理学报告系统（29.1%；688 例中的 200 例）。不采用报告系统的最常见原因是对实验室现有系统的满意度。各实验室的实施情况各不相同，这与哪些利益相关者参与了实施系统的决定以及在实施过程中提供的教育程度有关：结论：细胞病理实验室非妇科报告系统的实施情况差异很大。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine 医学-病理学

CiteScore

9.20

自引率

2.20%

发文量

369

审稿时长

3-8 weeks

期刊介绍： Welcome to the website of the Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine (APLM). This monthly, peer-reviewed journal of the College of American Pathologists offers global reach and highest measured readership among pathology journals. Published since 1926, ARCHIVES was voted in 2009 the only pathology journal among the top 100 most influential journals of the past 100 years by the BioMedical and Life Sciences Division of the Special Libraries Association. Online access to the full-text and PDF files of APLM articles is free.