Pharmacist Interventions for Adverse Drug Reactions in Palliative Care: A Multicentre Pilot Study.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Pharmazie Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1691/ph.2023.3554
E Kose, S Nakagawa, K Niki, J Hashizume, T Kawazoe, N Suzuki, M Uchida, H Takase
{"title":"Pharmacist Interventions for Adverse Drug Reactions in Palliative Care: A Multicentre Pilot Study.","authors":"E Kose,&nbsp;S Nakagawa,&nbsp;K Niki,&nbsp;J Hashizume,&nbsp;T Kawazoe,&nbsp;N Suzuki,&nbsp;M Uchida,&nbsp;H Takase","doi":"10.1691/ph.2023.3554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to investigate adverse reactions to medications administered during palliative care and compare the responses of Board-Certified Pharmacists in Palliative Pharmacy (BCPPP) and non-BCPPP professionals. <i>Methods</i>: This multicentre prospective survey included hospital and community pharmacists who are members of the Japanese Society for Pharmaceutical Palliative Care and Sciences. Study participants included patients who experienced new drug reactions during the study period and responded to the requested survey items. The follow-up period for each eligible patient began on the day the pharmacists initiated the intervention and ended at discharge, death, or after one month of intervention. The primary endpoint was the impact of pharmacist intervention on adverse drug reactions. The pharmacists included in the study evaluated the severity of adverse drug reactions to assess the effect of their intervention using an integrated palliative care outcome scale before and after the intervention. <i>Key findings</i>: During the survey period, 79 adverse drug reaction intervention reports from 69 patients were obtained from 54 pharmacists (28 certified and 26 non-certified). The response rate was 1.62% (54/3,343). The management of palliative pharmacotherapy side effects by BCPPP and non-BCPPP significantly improved the patients' activities of daily living (P < 0.001). The BCPPP group intervened for significantly more patients with adverse drug reactions and overall adverse drug reactions than the non-BCPPP group (P < 0.023 and P < 0.013, respectively). <i>Conclusion</i>: BCPPP interventions can improve symptom management.</p>","PeriodicalId":20145,"journal":{"name":"Pharmazie","volume":"78 8","pages":"141-149"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmazie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1691/ph.2023.3554","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate adverse reactions to medications administered during palliative care and compare the responses of Board-Certified Pharmacists in Palliative Pharmacy (BCPPP) and non-BCPPP professionals. Methods: This multicentre prospective survey included hospital and community pharmacists who are members of the Japanese Society for Pharmaceutical Palliative Care and Sciences. Study participants included patients who experienced new drug reactions during the study period and responded to the requested survey items. The follow-up period for each eligible patient began on the day the pharmacists initiated the intervention and ended at discharge, death, or after one month of intervention. The primary endpoint was the impact of pharmacist intervention on adverse drug reactions. The pharmacists included in the study evaluated the severity of adverse drug reactions to assess the effect of their intervention using an integrated palliative care outcome scale before and after the intervention. Key findings: During the survey period, 79 adverse drug reaction intervention reports from 69 patients were obtained from 54 pharmacists (28 certified and 26 non-certified). The response rate was 1.62% (54/3,343). The management of palliative pharmacotherapy side effects by BCPPP and non-BCPPP significantly improved the patients' activities of daily living (P < 0.001). The BCPPP group intervened for significantly more patients with adverse drug reactions and overall adverse drug reactions than the non-BCPPP group (P < 0.023 and P < 0.013, respectively). Conclusion: BCPPP interventions can improve symptom management.

姑息治疗中药物不良反应的药剂师干预:一项多中心试点研究。
本研究旨在调查姑息治疗期间药物的不良反应,并比较姑息药学委员会认证药剂师(BCPPP)和非BCPPP专业人员的反应。方法:这项多中心前瞻性调查包括医院和社区药剂师,他们是日本药物姑息治疗和科学学会的成员。研究参与者包括在研究期间经历新药反应并对所要求的调查项目做出回应的患者。每位符合条件的患者的随访期从药剂师开始干预的当天开始,到出院、死亡或干预一个月后结束。主要终点是药师干预对药物不良反应的影响。参与研究的药剂师在干预前后使用综合姑息治疗结果量表评估药物不良反应的严重程度,以评估其干预的效果。重点发现:调查期间,54名药师(有证药师28名,无证药师26名)共获得69例患者79份药物不良反应干预报告。有效率为1.62%(54/3,343)。BCPPP和非BCPPP对姑息性药物治疗副作用的管理显著改善了患者的日常生活活动(P < 0.001)。BCPPP组干预患者药物不良反应及总药物不良反应均显著高于非BCPPP组(P < 0.023, P < 0.013)。结论:BCPPP干预可改善症状管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmazie
Pharmazie 医学-化学综合
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
1.2 months
期刊介绍: The journal DiePharmazie publishs reviews, experimental studies, letters to the editor, as well as book reviews. The following fields of pharmacy are covered: Pharmaceutical and medicinal chemistry; Pharmaceutical analysis and drug control; Pharmaceutical technolgy; Biopharmacy (biopharmaceutics, pharmacokinetics, biotransformation); Experimental and clinical pharmacology; Pharmaceutical biology (pharmacognosy); Clinical pharmacy; History of pharmacy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信