Behavioral health care provider’s beliefs, confidence, and knowledge in treating cigarette smoking in relation to their use of the 5A’s intervention

Q1 Psychology
Midhat Z. Jafry , Jayda Martinez , Tzuan A. Chen , Maggie Britton , Isabel Martinez Leal , Anastasia Rogova , Bryce Kyburz , Teresa Williams , Mayuri Patel , Brian J. Carter , Lorraine R. Reitzel
{"title":"Behavioral health care provider’s beliefs, confidence, and knowledge in treating cigarette smoking in relation to their use of the 5A’s intervention","authors":"Midhat Z. Jafry ,&nbsp;Jayda Martinez ,&nbsp;Tzuan A. Chen ,&nbsp;Maggie Britton ,&nbsp;Isabel Martinez Leal ,&nbsp;Anastasia Rogova ,&nbsp;Bryce Kyburz ,&nbsp;Teresa Williams ,&nbsp;Mayuri Patel ,&nbsp;Brian J. Carter ,&nbsp;Lorraine R. Reitzel","doi":"10.1016/j.abrep.2023.100493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Evidence-based smoking cessation interventions are underused settings where behavioral health treatment is provided, contributing to smoking-related health disparities in this patient group. This study assessed the relationship of provider’s beliefs about patients’ smoking, perceptions of treatment capability, and knowledge of referral options and their use of the 5A’s (<u>A</u>sk, <u>A</u>dvise, <u>A</u>ssess, <u>A</u>ssist, and <u>A</u>rrange) intervention for smoking cessation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Surveys were collected from providers in healthcare settings in Texas where patients receive behavioral health care (N = 86; 9 federally qualified health centers, 16 Local Mental Health Authorities (LMHAs), 6 substance use treatment programs in LMHAs, and 55 stand-alone substance use treatment centers). Logistic regression analyses were used to assess the association between provider’s beliefs about patients’ concern and desire to quit smoking; perceptions of their confidence, skills, and effectiveness in treating smoking; their knowledge of referral options; and their use of the 5A’s with patients who smoked.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Providers who believed that patients were concerned about smoking and wanted to quit; who perceived themselves as confident in providing cessation care, having the required skills, and being effective in providing advice; and/or who had greater referral knowledge were more likely to use the 5A’s with patients who smoked than their (respective) provider counterparts (<em>p</em>s &lt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Provider-level constructs affect their 5A’s provision for patients with behavioral health needs. Future work should train providers to correct misconceptions about patients’ interest in quitting, bolster their confidence, and provide referral options to support tobacco provision efforts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38040,"journal":{"name":"Addictive Behaviors Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d4/7f/main.PMC10279772.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addictive Behaviors Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352853223000159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Evidence-based smoking cessation interventions are underused settings where behavioral health treatment is provided, contributing to smoking-related health disparities in this patient group. This study assessed the relationship of provider’s beliefs about patients’ smoking, perceptions of treatment capability, and knowledge of referral options and their use of the 5A’s (Ask, Advise, Assess, Assist, and Arrange) intervention for smoking cessation.

Methods

Surveys were collected from providers in healthcare settings in Texas where patients receive behavioral health care (N = 86; 9 federally qualified health centers, 16 Local Mental Health Authorities (LMHAs), 6 substance use treatment programs in LMHAs, and 55 stand-alone substance use treatment centers). Logistic regression analyses were used to assess the association between provider’s beliefs about patients’ concern and desire to quit smoking; perceptions of their confidence, skills, and effectiveness in treating smoking; their knowledge of referral options; and their use of the 5A’s with patients who smoked.

Results

Providers who believed that patients were concerned about smoking and wanted to quit; who perceived themselves as confident in providing cessation care, having the required skills, and being effective in providing advice; and/or who had greater referral knowledge were more likely to use the 5A’s with patients who smoked than their (respective) provider counterparts (ps < 0.05).

Conclusion

Provider-level constructs affect their 5A’s provision for patients with behavioral health needs. Future work should train providers to correct misconceptions about patients’ interest in quitting, bolster their confidence, and provide referral options to support tobacco provision efforts.

行为卫生保健提供者在治疗吸烟方面的信念、信心和知识与他们使用5A干预措施的关系
引言基于证据的戒烟干预措施是提供行为健康治疗的未充分利用的环境,导致了该患者群体中与吸烟相关的健康差异。这项研究评估了提供者对患者吸烟的信念、对治疗能力的认知、对转诊选项的了解以及他们对5A(询问、建议、评估、协助和安排)戒烟干预的使用之间的关系。方法从德克萨斯州接受行为健康护理的医疗机构的提供者那里收集调查(N=86;9个联邦合格的医疗中心,16个地方精神卫生局(LMHA),6个LMHA物质使用治疗项目,55个独立的物质使用治疗中心)。Logistic回归分析用于评估提供者对患者关注的信念与戒烟愿望之间的关系;对他们在治疗吸烟方面的信心、技能和有效性的看法;他们对转诊方案的了解;以及他们对吸烟患者使用5A。结果提供者认为患者关心吸烟并希望戒烟;他们认为自己有信心提供戒烟护理,具备必要的技能,并有效地提供建议;和/或具有更多转诊知识的人比他们(各自的)提供者更可能对吸烟患者使用5A(ps<;0.05)。结论提供者水平的结构影响他们为有行为健康需求的患者提供5A。未来的工作应该培训提供者纠正对患者戒烟兴趣的误解,增强他们的信心,并提供转诊选项来支持烟草供应工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Addictive Behaviors Reports
Addictive Behaviors Reports Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Addictive Behaviors Reports is an open-access and peer reviewed online-only journal offering an interdisciplinary forum for the publication of research in addictive behaviors. The journal accepts submissions that are scientifically sound on all forms of addictive behavior (alcohol, drugs, gambling, Internet, nicotine and technology) with a primary focus on behavioral and psychosocial research. The emphasis of the journal is primarily empirical. That is, sound experimental design combined with valid, reliable assessment and evaluation procedures are a requisite for acceptance. We are particularly interested in ''non-traditional'', innovative and empirically oriented research such as negative/null data papers, replication studies, case reports on novel treatments, and cross-cultural research. Studies that might encourage new lines of inquiry as well as scholarly commentaries on topical issues, systematic reviews, and mini reviews are also very much encouraged. We also welcome multimedia submissions that incorporate video or audio components to better display methodology or findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信