Michael R Nolff, Nathan O Conner, Joshua L Haworth, Daniel J Goble
{"title":"Lower Limb Asymmetry Evaluation Using the Balance Tracking System (BTrackS) Single Leg Stance Protocol.","authors":"Michael R Nolff, Nathan O Conner, Joshua L Haworth, Daniel J Goble","doi":"10.1080/00222895.2022.2163222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Single Leg Stance (SLS) balance testing is a common means of determining lower limb asymmetries in motor behavior. The Balance Tracking System (BTrackS) Balance Plate is a low-cost, portable force plate for objectively obtaining balance measurements. The present study provides the first known balance results for the BTrackS SLS protocol. BTrackS SLS testing was conducted on 161 young adults (90 women, 71 men) according to the test's standardized instructions. Specifically, participants performed one-legged (left or right) stance on the BTrackS Balance Plate for four, (2 practice, 2 actual) 20 s trials. SLS test outputs included total Center of Pressure path length and absolute symmetry index. Results showed that women had better SLS performance than men and that both sexes performed better on the actual compared to practice trial. Systematic one-sample t-tests of the Absolute Symmetry Index measures showed that a difference of 16% or greater between legs represented asymmetric performance. These results have clear value for individuals using BTrackS SLS testing to evaluate potential asymmetries. Additionally, these findings agree with previous reports showing sex differences favoring women on tests of static balance, and validate the use of a practice trial in the BTrackS SLS protocol.</p>","PeriodicalId":50125,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Motor Behavior","volume":"55 5","pages":"493-498"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Motor Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2022.2163222","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Single Leg Stance (SLS) balance testing is a common means of determining lower limb asymmetries in motor behavior. The Balance Tracking System (BTrackS) Balance Plate is a low-cost, portable force plate for objectively obtaining balance measurements. The present study provides the first known balance results for the BTrackS SLS protocol. BTrackS SLS testing was conducted on 161 young adults (90 women, 71 men) according to the test's standardized instructions. Specifically, participants performed one-legged (left or right) stance on the BTrackS Balance Plate for four, (2 practice, 2 actual) 20 s trials. SLS test outputs included total Center of Pressure path length and absolute symmetry index. Results showed that women had better SLS performance than men and that both sexes performed better on the actual compared to practice trial. Systematic one-sample t-tests of the Absolute Symmetry Index measures showed that a difference of 16% or greater between legs represented asymmetric performance. These results have clear value for individuals using BTrackS SLS testing to evaluate potential asymmetries. Additionally, these findings agree with previous reports showing sex differences favoring women on tests of static balance, and validate the use of a practice trial in the BTrackS SLS protocol.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Motor Behavior, a multidisciplinary journal of movement neuroscience, publishes articles that contribute to a basic understanding of motor control. Articles from different disciplinary perspectives and levels of analysis are encouraged, including neurophysiological, biomechanical, electrophysiological, psychological, mathematical and physical, and clinical approaches. Applied studies are acceptable only to the extent that they provide a significant contribution to a basic issue in motor control. Of special interest to the journal are those articles that attempt to bridge insights from different disciplinary perspectives to infer processes underlying motor control. Those approaches may embrace postural, locomotive, and manipulative aspects of motor functions, as well as coordination of speech articulators and eye movements. Articles dealing with analytical techniques and mathematical modeling are welcome.