Religiosity & mental health seeking behaviors among U.S. adults.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Augustine Cassis Obeng Boateng, Joshua Sebu, Ruby Lekwauwa, Katherine C Britt, Hayoung Oh, Benjamin Doolittle
{"title":"Religiosity & mental health seeking behaviors among U.S. adults.","authors":"Augustine Cassis Obeng Boateng, Joshua Sebu, Ruby Lekwauwa, Katherine C Britt, Hayoung Oh, Benjamin Doolittle","doi":"10.1177/00912174231187841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The association between religiosity and secular mental health utilization is unclear. Evidence suggests that religious and spiritual leaders (R/S leaders) may be more trusted than secular mental health therapists (SMHTs) and are often the first point of contact for individuals with mental health problems who identify as religious.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Generalized equation estimate (GEE) analyses were used to examine the association between religiosity and mental health seeking behaviours in 2,107 participants using t Midlife in the United States Study (MIDUS) data collected between 1995 and 2014.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final model indicated that after adjusting for covariates, higher levels of baseline religious identification and baseline spirituality (assessed in 1995) predicted an increase in visits to R/S leaders from 1995 to 2014 by a factor of 1.08 (95% CI=1.01-1.16) and 1.89 (95% CI=1.56-2.28), respectively. Higher levels of baseline religious identification reduced SMHTs visits by a factor of 0.94 (95% CI=0.90-0.98), whereas higher levels of baseline spirituality increased SMHTs visits by a factor of 1.13 (95% CI=1.00-1.27) during the same timeframe.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Higher levels of spirituality and religious identification increased the frequency over time of seeking mental health support from R/S leaders relative to SMHTs. Individuals with mental illness may seek support from religious resources, mental health professionals, or both, underscoring the importance of collaboration between R/S leaders and SMHTs. Mental health training for R/S leaders and collaboration with SMHTs may help alleviate mental health burden, especially among those who highly value their religious and spiritual beliefs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50294,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"248-264"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10832325/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00912174231187841","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The association between religiosity and secular mental health utilization is unclear. Evidence suggests that religious and spiritual leaders (R/S leaders) may be more trusted than secular mental health therapists (SMHTs) and are often the first point of contact for individuals with mental health problems who identify as religious.

Methods: Generalized equation estimate (GEE) analyses were used to examine the association between religiosity and mental health seeking behaviours in 2,107 participants using t Midlife in the United States Study (MIDUS) data collected between 1995 and 2014.

Results: The final model indicated that after adjusting for covariates, higher levels of baseline religious identification and baseline spirituality (assessed in 1995) predicted an increase in visits to R/S leaders from 1995 to 2014 by a factor of 1.08 (95% CI=1.01-1.16) and 1.89 (95% CI=1.56-2.28), respectively. Higher levels of baseline religious identification reduced SMHTs visits by a factor of 0.94 (95% CI=0.90-0.98), whereas higher levels of baseline spirituality increased SMHTs visits by a factor of 1.13 (95% CI=1.00-1.27) during the same timeframe.

Conclusion: Higher levels of spirituality and religious identification increased the frequency over time of seeking mental health support from R/S leaders relative to SMHTs. Individuals with mental illness may seek support from religious resources, mental health professionals, or both, underscoring the importance of collaboration between R/S leaders and SMHTs. Mental health training for R/S leaders and collaboration with SMHTs may help alleviate mental health burden, especially among those who highly value their religious and spiritual beliefs.

美国成年人的宗教信仰与寻求心理健康的行为。
目的:宗教信仰与世俗心理健康利用率之间的关系尚不明确。有证据表明,宗教和精神领袖(R/S Leaders)可能比世俗心理健康治疗师(SMHTs)更受信任,而且往往是那些有心理健康问题并自称信教的人的第一接触点:方法:利用美国中年研究(MIDUS)1995 年至 2014 年的数据,对 2107 名参与者进行了广义等式估计(GEE)分析,以研究宗教信仰与心理健康寻求行为之间的关联:最终模型的结果表明,在对协变量进行调整后,较高的基线宗教认同和基线灵性水平(1995 年评估)可预测 1995-2014 年期间寻求 R/S 领导的人次增加,系数分别为 1.08 [95% CI, 1.01, 1.16] 和 1.89 [95% CI, 1.56, 2.28]。基线宗教认同水平越高,SMHTs就诊率降低0.94倍[.90, .98],而基线灵性水平越高,同一时期SMHTs就诊率增加1.13倍[95% CI, 1.00, 1.27]:结论:随着时间的推移,灵性和宗教认同水平较高的人寻求 R/S 领导人心理健康支持的频率要高于 SMHT。患有精神疾病的人可能会从宗教资源、心理健康专业人士那里寻求支持,或者两者兼而有之,这就凸显了R/S领导者和SMHT之间合作的重要性。对R/S领导者进行心理健康培训,并与SMHTs合作,可能有助于减轻心理健康负担,尤其是那些高度重视宗教和精神信仰的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine (IJPM) bridges the gap between clinical psychiatry research and primary care clinical research. Providing a forum for addressing: The relevance of psychobiological, psychological, social, familial, religious, and cultural factors in the development and treatment of illness; the relationship of biomarkers to psychiatric symptoms and syndromes in primary care...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信