A systematic review on the use of bacteriophage in treating Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in cystic fibrosis

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Jagdev Singh , Eugene Yeoh , Dominic A. Fitzgerald , Hiran Selvadurai
{"title":"A systematic review on the use of bacteriophage in treating Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in cystic fibrosis","authors":"Jagdev Singh ,&nbsp;Eugene Yeoh ,&nbsp;Dominic A. Fitzgerald ,&nbsp;Hiran Selvadurai","doi":"10.1016/j.prrv.2023.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Respiratory infections caused by <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> and <em>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em> are a major concern for cystic fibrosis (CF) patients due to increasing antibiotic resistance. Bacteriophages, which are viruses that selectively target and kill bacteria, are being studied as an alternative treatment for these infections.</p><p>This systematic review evaluates the safety and effectiveness of bacteriophages for the treatment of CF-related infections caused by <em>S. aureus</em> and/or <em>P. aeruginosa</em>.</p><p>We conducted a search for original, published articles in the English language up to March 2023. Studies that administered bacteriophages via intravenous, nebulised, inhaled, or intranasal routes were included, with no comparators required. <em>In vitro</em> and <em>in vivo</em> studies were eligible for inclusion, and only animal <em>in vivo</em> studies that utilised a CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) animal model were included.</p><p>Bacteriophage treatment resulted in a decrease in bacterial load in both humans and animals infected with <em>P. aeruginosa</em>. Complete eradication of <em>P. aeruginosa</em> was only observed in one human subject. Additionally, there was a reduction in biofilm, improvement in resistance profile, and reduced pulmonary exacerbations in individual case reports. Evidence suggests that bacteriophage therapy may be a promising treatment option for CF-related infections caused by <em>P. aeruginosa</em> and <em>S. aureus</em>. However, larger and more robust trials are needed to establish its safety and efficacy and create necessary evidence for global legislative frameworks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19658,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric Respiratory Reviews","volume":"48 ","pages":"Pages 3-9"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paediatric Respiratory Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526054223000453","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Respiratory infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are a major concern for cystic fibrosis (CF) patients due to increasing antibiotic resistance. Bacteriophages, which are viruses that selectively target and kill bacteria, are being studied as an alternative treatment for these infections.

This systematic review evaluates the safety and effectiveness of bacteriophages for the treatment of CF-related infections caused by S. aureus and/or P. aeruginosa.

We conducted a search for original, published articles in the English language up to March 2023. Studies that administered bacteriophages via intravenous, nebulised, inhaled, or intranasal routes were included, with no comparators required. In vitro and in vivo studies were eligible for inclusion, and only animal in vivo studies that utilised a CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) animal model were included.

Bacteriophage treatment resulted in a decrease in bacterial load in both humans and animals infected with P. aeruginosa. Complete eradication of P. aeruginosa was only observed in one human subject. Additionally, there was a reduction in biofilm, improvement in resistance profile, and reduced pulmonary exacerbations in individual case reports. Evidence suggests that bacteriophage therapy may be a promising treatment option for CF-related infections caused by P. aeruginosa and S. aureus. However, larger and more robust trials are needed to establish its safety and efficacy and create necessary evidence for global legislative frameworks.

噬菌体用于治疗囊性纤维化患者金黄色葡萄球菌和绿脓杆菌感染的系统综述
背景由于抗生素耐药性的增加,由金黄色葡萄球菌和绿脓杆菌引起的呼吸道感染是囊性纤维化(CF)患者的一个主要问题。本系统性综述评估了噬菌体治疗金黄色葡萄球菌和/或绿脓杆菌引起的 CF 相关感染的安全性和有效性。通过静脉注射、雾化、吸入或鼻内途径给药噬菌体的研究均被纳入其中,且不要求有比较对象。体外和体内研究均可纳入,只有使用 CF 跨膜传导调节器(CFTR)动物模型的动物体内研究才可纳入。噬菌体治疗使感染铜绿假单胞菌的人类和动物体内的细菌量减少,仅在一名人类实验对象体内观察到铜绿假单胞菌被完全根除。此外,在个别病例报告中,生物膜有所减少,耐药性特征有所改善,肺部症状加重的情况也有所减少。有证据表明,噬菌体疗法可能是治疗铜绿假单胞菌和金黄色葡萄球菌引起的 CF 相关感染的一种很有前景的治疗方法。然而,要确定其安全性和有效性,并为全球立法框架提供必要的证据,还需要进行更大规模和更有力的试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Paediatric Respiratory Reviews
Paediatric Respiratory Reviews 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: Paediatric Respiratory Reviews offers authors the opportunity to submit their own editorials, educational reviews and short communications on topics relevant to paediatric respiratory medicine. These peer reviewed contributions will complement the commissioned reviews which will continue to form an integral part of the journal. Subjects covered include: • Epidemiology • Immunology and cell biology • Physiology • Occupational disorders • The role of allergens and pollutants A particular emphasis is given to the recommendation of "best practice" for primary care physicians and paediatricians. Paediatric Respiratory Reviews is aimed at general paediatricians but it should also be read by specialist paediatric physicians and nurses, respiratory physicians and general practitioners. It is a journal for those who are busy and do not have time to read systematically through literature, but who need to stay up to date in the field of paediatric respiratory and sleep medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信