{"title":"A systematic review on the use of bacteriophage in treating Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in cystic fibrosis","authors":"Jagdev Singh , Eugene Yeoh , Dominic A. Fitzgerald , Hiran Selvadurai","doi":"10.1016/j.prrv.2023.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Respiratory infections caused by <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> and <em>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em> are a major concern for cystic fibrosis (CF) patients due to increasing antibiotic resistance. Bacteriophages, which are viruses that selectively target and kill bacteria, are being studied as an alternative treatment for these infections.</p><p>This systematic review evaluates the safety and effectiveness of bacteriophages for the treatment of CF-related infections caused by <em>S. aureus</em> and/or <em>P. aeruginosa</em>.</p><p>We conducted a search for original, published articles in the English language up to March 2023. Studies that administered bacteriophages via intravenous, nebulised, inhaled, or intranasal routes were included, with no comparators required. <em>In vitro</em> and <em>in vivo</em> studies were eligible for inclusion, and only animal <em>in vivo</em> studies that utilised a CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) animal model were included.</p><p>Bacteriophage treatment resulted in a decrease in bacterial load in both humans and animals infected with <em>P. aeruginosa</em>. Complete eradication of <em>P. aeruginosa</em> was only observed in one human subject. Additionally, there was a reduction in biofilm, improvement in resistance profile, and reduced pulmonary exacerbations in individual case reports. Evidence suggests that bacteriophage therapy may be a promising treatment option for CF-related infections caused by <em>P. aeruginosa</em> and <em>S. aureus</em>. However, larger and more robust trials are needed to establish its safety and efficacy and create necessary evidence for global legislative frameworks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19658,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric Respiratory Reviews","volume":"48 ","pages":"Pages 3-9"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paediatric Respiratory Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526054223000453","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Respiratory infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are a major concern for cystic fibrosis (CF) patients due to increasing antibiotic resistance. Bacteriophages, which are viruses that selectively target and kill bacteria, are being studied as an alternative treatment for these infections.
This systematic review evaluates the safety and effectiveness of bacteriophages for the treatment of CF-related infections caused by S. aureus and/or P. aeruginosa.
We conducted a search for original, published articles in the English language up to March 2023. Studies that administered bacteriophages via intravenous, nebulised, inhaled, or intranasal routes were included, with no comparators required. In vitro and in vivo studies were eligible for inclusion, and only animal in vivo studies that utilised a CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) animal model were included.
Bacteriophage treatment resulted in a decrease in bacterial load in both humans and animals infected with P. aeruginosa. Complete eradication of P. aeruginosa was only observed in one human subject. Additionally, there was a reduction in biofilm, improvement in resistance profile, and reduced pulmonary exacerbations in individual case reports. Evidence suggests that bacteriophage therapy may be a promising treatment option for CF-related infections caused by P. aeruginosa and S. aureus. However, larger and more robust trials are needed to establish its safety and efficacy and create necessary evidence for global legislative frameworks.
期刊介绍:
Paediatric Respiratory Reviews offers authors the opportunity to submit their own editorials, educational reviews and short communications on topics relevant to paediatric respiratory medicine. These peer reviewed contributions will complement the commissioned reviews which will continue to form an integral part of the journal.
Subjects covered include:
• Epidemiology
• Immunology and cell biology
• Physiology
• Occupational disorders
• The role of allergens and pollutants
A particular emphasis is given to the recommendation of "best practice" for primary care physicians and paediatricians.
Paediatric Respiratory Reviews is aimed at general paediatricians but it should also be read by specialist paediatric physicians and nurses, respiratory physicians and general practitioners.
It is a journal for those who are busy and do not have time to read systematically through literature, but who need to stay up to date in the field of paediatric respiratory and sleep medicine.