[The 5-5-2 criteria for biliary cannulation and post endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography complications: Experience in a reference hospital, Peru].

Q4 Medicine
Wilmer Gustavo Quiroga-Purizaca, Diego Ricardo Páucar-Aguilar, Jackeline Amparo Barrientos-Pérez, Isamar Benyi Gutiérrez-Córdova, Renato Garrido-Acedo, Daniel Andrei Vargas-Blácido
{"title":"[The 5-5-2 criteria for biliary cannulation and post endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography complications: Experience in a reference hospital, Peru].","authors":"Wilmer Gustavo Quiroga-Purizaca,&nbsp;Diego Ricardo Páucar-Aguilar,&nbsp;Jackeline Amparo Barrientos-Pérez,&nbsp;Isamar Benyi Gutiérrez-Córdova,&nbsp;Renato Garrido-Acedo,&nbsp;Daniel Andrei Vargas-Blácido","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The European Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) defines \"difficult biliary cannulation\" by the presence of one or more of the following: more than 5 contacts with the papilla, more than 5 minutes attempting to cannulate, or inadvertent cannulation of the pancreatic duct in 2 or more times (5-5-2 criteria), recommending these cut-off points to perform advanced cannulation techniques in order to reduce the rate of post-ERCP adverse events. Our objective was to evaluate the performance of the 5-5-2 criteria and their association with post-ERCP complications in a reference hospital in Peru. We performed a prospective analytical case-control study and 120 patients who underwent ERCP were enrolled. The case group included 30 patients who met at least one of the 5-5-2 criteria and the control group included 90 patients without any of these criteria. The ERCP- related complications in both groups and their association with each of the 5-5-2 criteria were compared. The ERCP-related complications that occurred were post-ERCP pancreatitis (6.6% in the case group vs. 3.3% in the control group), bleeding (3.3% controls vs. 0% cases) and perforation (1.1% controls vs. 0% cases); no statistically significant differences were observed. The criterion of 2 or more unintended cannulations to the pancreatic duct showed a significant association (OR= 10.29, CI: 1.47-71.98; p= 0.005) with the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis. The criteria 5 minutes and 5 attempts were not associated with post-ERCP complications. In conclusion, among 5-5-2 criteria only the unintended cannulation of 2 or more times into the pancreatic duct was associated with an increased risk of post-ERC pancreatitis. The time and number of attempts criteria could be cautiously expanded without increasing the rate of post-ERCP complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":35807,"journal":{"name":"Revista de gastroenterologia del Peru : organo oficial de la Sociedad de Gastroenterologia del Peru","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de gastroenterologia del Peru : organo oficial de la Sociedad de Gastroenterologia del Peru","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The European Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) defines "difficult biliary cannulation" by the presence of one or more of the following: more than 5 contacts with the papilla, more than 5 minutes attempting to cannulate, or inadvertent cannulation of the pancreatic duct in 2 or more times (5-5-2 criteria), recommending these cut-off points to perform advanced cannulation techniques in order to reduce the rate of post-ERCP adverse events. Our objective was to evaluate the performance of the 5-5-2 criteria and their association with post-ERCP complications in a reference hospital in Peru. We performed a prospective analytical case-control study and 120 patients who underwent ERCP were enrolled. The case group included 30 patients who met at least one of the 5-5-2 criteria and the control group included 90 patients without any of these criteria. The ERCP- related complications in both groups and their association with each of the 5-5-2 criteria were compared. The ERCP-related complications that occurred were post-ERCP pancreatitis (6.6% in the case group vs. 3.3% in the control group), bleeding (3.3% controls vs. 0% cases) and perforation (1.1% controls vs. 0% cases); no statistically significant differences were observed. The criterion of 2 or more unintended cannulations to the pancreatic duct showed a significant association (OR= 10.29, CI: 1.47-71.98; p= 0.005) with the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis. The criteria 5 minutes and 5 attempts were not associated with post-ERCP complications. In conclusion, among 5-5-2 criteria only the unintended cannulation of 2 or more times into the pancreatic duct was associated with an increased risk of post-ERC pancreatitis. The time and number of attempts criteria could be cautiously expanded without increasing the rate of post-ERCP complications.

[胆管插管和内镜下逆行胰胆管造影术后并发症的5-5-2标准:秘鲁一家参考医院的经验]。
欧洲胃肠内窥镜学会(ESGE)将“困难胆道插管”定义为存在以下一种或多种情况:与乳头接触超过5次,尝试插管超过5分钟,或2次或多次无意中插管胰管(5-5-2标准),建议使用这些截止点进行先进的插管技术,以降低ERCP术后不良事件的发生率。我们的目的是在秘鲁的一家参考医院评估5-5-2标准的表现及其与ERCP术后并发症的关系。我们进行了一项前瞻性病例对照分析研究,纳入了120名接受ERCP的患者。病例组包括30名符合5-5-2标准中至少一项的患者,对照组包括90名没有这些标准的患者。比较两组ERCP相关并发症及其与5-5-2标准的相关性。发生的ERCP相关并发症为ERCP术后胰腺炎(病例组6.6%对对照组3.3%)、出血(对照组3.3%对0%)和穿孔(对照组1.1%对0%);没有观察到统计学上的显著差异。胰管意外插管2次或2次以上的标准与ERCP术后胰腺炎的发生率显著相关(or=10.29,CI:1.47-71.98;p=0.005)。5分钟和5次尝试的标准与ERCP术后并发症无关。总之,在5-5-2标准中,只有2次或更多次非故意插管进入胰管与ERC术后胰腺炎的风险增加有关。在不增加ERCP术后并发症发生率的情况下,可以谨慎地扩大尝试的时间和次数标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: La REVISTA DE GASTROENTEROLOGíA DEL PERÚ, es la publicación oficial de la Sociedad de Gastroenterología del Perú que publica artículos originales, artículos de revisión, reporte de casos, cartas e información general de la especialidad; dirigido a los profesionales de la salud con especial interés en la gastroenterología. La Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú es una publicación de periodicidad trimestral y tiene como objetivo la publicación de artículos científicos inéditos en el campo de la gastroenterología, proporcionando información actualizada y relevante de la especialidad y áreas afines. La Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú publica artículos en dos idiomas, español e inglés, a texto completo en la versión impresa yelectrónica. Los artículos científicos son sometidos a revisores o árbitros nacionales e internacionales, especialistas que opinan bajo la modalidad de doble ciego y de manera anónima sobre la calidad y validez de los mismos. El número de revisores depende del tipo de artículo, dos revisores como mínimo para artículos originales y uno como mínimo para otros tipos de artículos.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信