Dynamic and static ultrasound features predictive of vesicoureteral reflux and renal damage in children and adolescents with neurogenic bladder.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Carlos Magno Paiva da Silva, Mônica Maria de Almeida Vasconcelos, Eleonora Moreira Lima, José de Bessa, Otávio Augusto Fonseca Reis, Maria Francisca Tereza Freire Filgueiras, Roberta Vasconcellos Menezes de Azevedo, José Murillo Bastos, Eduardo Araújo Oliveira, Flávia Cristina de Carvalho Mrad
{"title":"Dynamic and static ultrasound features predictive of vesicoureteral reflux and renal damage in children and adolescents with neurogenic bladder.","authors":"Carlos Magno Paiva da Silva, Mônica Maria de Almeida Vasconcelos, Eleonora Moreira Lima, José de Bessa, Otávio Augusto Fonseca Reis, Maria Francisca Tereza Freire Filgueiras, Roberta Vasconcellos Menezes de Azevedo, José Murillo Bastos, Eduardo Araújo Oliveira, Flávia Cristina de Carvalho Mrad","doi":"10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2023.0311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of dynamic and static ultrasound (DSUS) in detecting vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) and renal scarring in a cohort of children with neurogenic bladder (NB).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective, longitudinal, observational study was conducted using the Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies guideline. The DSUS (index test) data were compared with voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) and renal scintigraphy 99mTc-dimercaptosuccinic (reference tests). Overall performance for predicting VUR and renal scarring was assessed using renal pelvic diameter (RPD)/distal ureteral diameter and renal parenchymal thinning on DSUS, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 107 patients (66 girls, median age 9.6 years) participated. Seventeen patients (15.9%) presented VUR, eight bilateral. For overall reflux grade, the AUC was 0.624 for RPD and 0.630 for distal ureteral diameter. The diagnostic performance for detecting high-grade VUR was slightly better for DSUS parameters. The AUC was 0.666 for RPD and 0.691 for distal ureteral diameter. The cut-offs of 5 mm for RPD and 6.5 mm for distal ureteral diameter presented the best diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) to identify high-grade VUR. The increase of RPD during detrusor contractions showed an accuracy of 89.2%. The thinness of renal parenchyma presented an accuracy of 88% for renal scarring.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DSUS predicts VUR and renal scarring in children with NB with fair to good accuracy, and all measurements exhibited a high negative predictive value (NPV). The increase in RPD during voiding or detrusor contractions proved to be the most accurate parameter for indicating the presence of VUR in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":49283,"journal":{"name":"International Braz J Urol","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10947619/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Braz J Urol","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2023.0311","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of dynamic and static ultrasound (DSUS) in detecting vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) and renal scarring in a cohort of children with neurogenic bladder (NB).

Materials and methods: A retrospective, longitudinal, observational study was conducted using the Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies guideline. The DSUS (index test) data were compared with voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) and renal scintigraphy 99mTc-dimercaptosuccinic (reference tests). Overall performance for predicting VUR and renal scarring was assessed using renal pelvic diameter (RPD)/distal ureteral diameter and renal parenchymal thinning on DSUS, respectively.

Results: A total of 107 patients (66 girls, median age 9.6 years) participated. Seventeen patients (15.9%) presented VUR, eight bilateral. For overall reflux grade, the AUC was 0.624 for RPD and 0.630 for distal ureteral diameter. The diagnostic performance for detecting high-grade VUR was slightly better for DSUS parameters. The AUC was 0.666 for RPD and 0.691 for distal ureteral diameter. The cut-offs of 5 mm for RPD and 6.5 mm for distal ureteral diameter presented the best diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) to identify high-grade VUR. The increase of RPD during detrusor contractions showed an accuracy of 89.2%. The thinness of renal parenchyma presented an accuracy of 88% for renal scarring.

Conclusion: DSUS predicts VUR and renal scarring in children with NB with fair to good accuracy, and all measurements exhibited a high negative predictive value (NPV). The increase in RPD during voiding or detrusor contractions proved to be the most accurate parameter for indicating the presence of VUR in this study.

动态和静态超声特征预测神经源性膀胱儿童和青少年膀胱输尿管反流和肾损伤。
目的:本研究旨在分析动态和静态超声(DSUS)在检测神经源性膀胱(NB)患儿膀胱输尿管反流(VUR)和肾瘢痕形成方面的诊断准确性。材料和方法:使用报告诊断准确性研究指南进行回顾性、纵向、观察性研究。将DSUS(指数试验)数据与排尿膀胱尿道造影(VCUG)和肾闪烁显像99mTc-二巯基丁二酸(参考试验)进行比较。分别使用DSUS上的肾盂直径(RPD)/输尿管远端直径和肾实质变薄来评估预测VUR和肾瘢痕形成的总体性能。结果:共有107名患者(66名女孩,中位年龄9.6岁)参与。17名患者(15.9%)出现VUR,其中8名为双侧VUR。对于总反流分级,RPD的AUC为0.624,输尿管远端直径的AUC则为0.630。DSUS参数检测高级VUR的诊断性能略好。RPD和输尿管远端直径的AUC分别为0.666和0.691。RPD为5 mm,输尿管远端直径为6.5 mm的截止值是确定高级别VUR的最佳诊断优势比(DOR)。逼尿肌收缩过程中RPD的增加显示出89.2%的准确率。肾实质薄显示出肾瘢痕形成的准确率为88%。结论:DSUS对NB患儿VUR和肾瘢痕形成的预测具有较好的准确性,所有测量结果均具有较高的阴性预测值(NPV)。在本研究中,排尿或逼尿肌收缩过程中RPD的增加被证明是指示VUR存在的最准确的参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Braz J Urol
International Braz J Urol UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
21.60%
发文量
246
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信