Higher Serologic Responses of Early Syphilis to Single-dose Benzathine Penicillin G Plus Doxycycline Versus Single-dose Benzathine Penicillin G Alone Among People With HIV.

IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Kai-Hsiang Chen, Hsin-Yun Sun, Chung-Hsu Chen, Yu-Chung Chuang, Yu-Shan Huang, Wang-Da Liu, Szu-Min Hsieh, Wang-Huei Sheng, Aristine Cheng, Tzong-Yow Wu, Kuan-Yin Lin, Chien-Ching Hung
{"title":"Higher Serologic Responses of Early Syphilis to Single-dose Benzathine Penicillin G Plus Doxycycline Versus Single-dose Benzathine Penicillin G Alone Among People With HIV.","authors":"Kai-Hsiang Chen, Hsin-Yun Sun, Chung-Hsu Chen, Yu-Chung Chuang, Yu-Shan Huang, Wang-Da Liu, Szu-Min Hsieh, Wang-Huei Sheng, Aristine Cheng, Tzong-Yow Wu, Kuan-Yin Lin, Chien-Ching Hung","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciad508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Single-dose benzathine penicillin G (BPG) is the preferred therapy for early syphilis, but poorer serologic responses have been observed among people with human immunodeficiency virus (PWH). No enhanced regimen has previously been shown to improve serologic outcomes of early syphilis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study to compare the treatment responses to single-dose BPG combined with 7-day doxycycline versus BPG alone in PWH who presented with early syphilis. Rapid plasma reagin (RPR) titers were determined every 3-6 months for all included PWH. Serologic response was defined as at least a 4-fold decline in RPR titers at month 12.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During January 2018 to March 2022, 223 PWH with 307 episodes of early syphilis received single-dose BPG plus doxycycline and 347 PWH with 391 episodes received BPG alone. The median age was 36 years and baseline CD4 count was 600 cells/mm3. In the intention-to-treat with last-observation-carried-forward analysis, PWH receiving BPG plus doxycycline had a significantly higher serologic response rate at 12 months of treatment than those receiving BPG alone (79.5% vs 70.3%, respectively; P = .006). The factors associated with 12-month serologic response were RPR titer (per 1-log2 increase, adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-1.35) and receipt of BPG plus doxycycline (AOR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.20-2.46). In the subgroup analyses, BPG plus doxycycline was consistently associated with a better serologic response than BPG alone at month 12.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among PWH with early syphilis, single-dose BPG plus doxycycline achieved higher serologic responses than BPG alone during a 12-month follow-up period.</p>","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1308-1315"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciad508","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Single-dose benzathine penicillin G (BPG) is the preferred therapy for early syphilis, but poorer serologic responses have been observed among people with human immunodeficiency virus (PWH). No enhanced regimen has previously been shown to improve serologic outcomes of early syphilis.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study to compare the treatment responses to single-dose BPG combined with 7-day doxycycline versus BPG alone in PWH who presented with early syphilis. Rapid plasma reagin (RPR) titers were determined every 3-6 months for all included PWH. Serologic response was defined as at least a 4-fold decline in RPR titers at month 12.

Results: During January 2018 to March 2022, 223 PWH with 307 episodes of early syphilis received single-dose BPG plus doxycycline and 347 PWH with 391 episodes received BPG alone. The median age was 36 years and baseline CD4 count was 600 cells/mm3. In the intention-to-treat with last-observation-carried-forward analysis, PWH receiving BPG plus doxycycline had a significantly higher serologic response rate at 12 months of treatment than those receiving BPG alone (79.5% vs 70.3%, respectively; P = .006). The factors associated with 12-month serologic response were RPR titer (per 1-log2 increase, adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-1.35) and receipt of BPG plus doxycycline (AOR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.20-2.46). In the subgroup analyses, BPG plus doxycycline was consistently associated with a better serologic response than BPG alone at month 12.

Conclusions: Among PWH with early syphilis, single-dose BPG plus doxycycline achieved higher serologic responses than BPG alone during a 12-month follow-up period.

在艾滋病病毒感染者中,早期梅毒对单剂苄星青霉素 G 加强力霉素与单剂苄星青霉素 G 的血清学反应较高。
背景:单剂量苄星青霉素G(BPG)是早期梅毒的首选疗法,但在人类免疫缺陷病毒感染者(PWH)中观察到血清学反应较差。以前没有任何强化治疗方案能改善早期梅毒的血清学结果:我们进行了一项回顾性研究,比较单剂量 BPG 联合 7 天多西环素与单纯 BPG 对早期梅毒患者的治疗反应。每3-6个月对所有纳入研究的梅毒患者进行一次快速血浆试剂滴度测定。第12个月时RPR滴度下降至少4倍即为血清学反应:2018年1月至2022年3月期间,223名患有307次早期梅毒的PWH接受了单剂量BPG加多西环素治疗,347名患有391次梅毒的PWH接受了单剂量BPG治疗。中位年龄为 36 岁,基线 CD4 细胞计数为 600 cells/mm3。在意向治疗和最后观察前移分析中,接受 BPG 加多西环素治疗的 PWH 在治疗 12 个月后的血清学应答率显著高于单用 BPG 的 PWH(分别为 79.5% 对 70.3%;P = .006)。与 12 个月血清学应答相关的因素是 RPR 滴度(每增加 1-log2,调整赔率 [AOR],1.25;95% 置信区间 [CI],1.15-1.35)和接受 BPG 加多西环素治疗(AOR,1.71;95% CI,1.20-2.46)。在亚组分析中,BPG加多西环素在第12个月时的血清学反应始终优于单用BPG:结论:在早期梅毒患者中,在12个月的随访期间,单剂量BPG加多西环素的血清学反应高于单用BPG。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Clinical Infectious Diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
25.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
900
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Infectious Diseases (CID) is dedicated to publishing original research, reviews, guidelines, and perspectives with the potential to reshape clinical practice, providing clinicians with valuable insights for patient care. CID comprehensively addresses the clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of a wide spectrum of infectious diseases. The journal places a high priority on the assessment of current and innovative treatments, microbiology, immunology, and policies, ensuring relevance to patient care in its commitment to advancing the field of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信