Impact of the COVID-19 Outbreak on the Treatment of Myocardial Infarction Patients.

IF 0.8 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Maik J Grundeken, Bimmer E P M Claessen
{"title":"Impact of the COVID-19 Outbreak on the Treatment of Myocardial Infarction Patients.","authors":"Maik J Grundeken,&nbsp;Bimmer E P M Claessen","doi":"10.1007/s11936-023-00988-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has led to an overburdened healthcare system. While an increased rate of ACS is expected due to the pro-thrombotic state of COVID patients, observed ACS incidence and admission rates were paradoxically decreased during the (first wave of the) pandemic. In this narrative review, we will discuss potential reasons for this decrease in ACS incidence. Furthermore, we will discuss ACS management during the COVID-19 pandemic, and we will discuss outcomes in ACS.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>A reluctance to seek medical contact (in order not to further overburden the health system or due to fear of being infected with COVID-19 while in hospital) and unavailability of medical services seem to be important factors. This may have led to an increased symptom onset to first medical contact time and an increased rate of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. A trend towards less invasive management was observed (less invasive coronary angiography in NSTEMI patients and more \"fibrinolysis-first\" in STEMI patients), although a large variation was observed with some centers having a relative increase in early invasive management. Patients with ACS and concomitant COVID-19 infection have worse outcomes compared to ACS patients without COVID-19 infection. All of the above led to worse clinical outcomes in patients presenting with ACS during the COVID-19 pandemic. Interestingly, staffing and hospital bed shortages led to experimentation with very early discharge (24 h after primary PCI) in low-risk STEMI patients which had a very good prognosis and resulted in significant shorter hospital duration.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, ACS incidence and admission rates were decreased, symptom onset to first medical contact time prolonged, and out-of-hospital rates increased. A trend towards less invasive management was observed. Patients presenting with ACS during the COVID-19 pandemic had a worse outcome. On the other hand, experimental very early discharge in low-risk patients may relieve the healthcare system. Such initiatives, and strategies to lower the reluctance of patients with ACS symptoms to seek medical help, are vital to improve prognosis in ACS patients in future pandemics.</p>","PeriodicalId":35912,"journal":{"name":"Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10250853/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-023-00988-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to an overburdened healthcare system. While an increased rate of ACS is expected due to the pro-thrombotic state of COVID patients, observed ACS incidence and admission rates were paradoxically decreased during the (first wave of the) pandemic. In this narrative review, we will discuss potential reasons for this decrease in ACS incidence. Furthermore, we will discuss ACS management during the COVID-19 pandemic, and we will discuss outcomes in ACS.

Recent findings: A reluctance to seek medical contact (in order not to further overburden the health system or due to fear of being infected with COVID-19 while in hospital) and unavailability of medical services seem to be important factors. This may have led to an increased symptom onset to first medical contact time and an increased rate of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. A trend towards less invasive management was observed (less invasive coronary angiography in NSTEMI patients and more "fibrinolysis-first" in STEMI patients), although a large variation was observed with some centers having a relative increase in early invasive management. Patients with ACS and concomitant COVID-19 infection have worse outcomes compared to ACS patients without COVID-19 infection. All of the above led to worse clinical outcomes in patients presenting with ACS during the COVID-19 pandemic. Interestingly, staffing and hospital bed shortages led to experimentation with very early discharge (24 h after primary PCI) in low-risk STEMI patients which had a very good prognosis and resulted in significant shorter hospital duration.

Summary: During the COVID-19 pandemic, ACS incidence and admission rates were decreased, symptom onset to first medical contact time prolonged, and out-of-hospital rates increased. A trend towards less invasive management was observed. Patients presenting with ACS during the COVID-19 pandemic had a worse outcome. On the other hand, experimental very early discharge in low-risk patients may relieve the healthcare system. Such initiatives, and strategies to lower the reluctance of patients with ACS symptoms to seek medical help, are vital to improve prognosis in ACS patients in future pandemics.

Abstract Image

新冠肺炎疫情对心肌梗死患者治疗的影响。
审查目的:新冠肺炎大流行导致医疗系统负担过重。虽然由于新冠肺炎患者的促血栓状态,预计ACS的发病率会增加,但在(第一波)疫情期间,观察到的ACS发病率和入院率却出现了矛盾的下降。在这篇叙述性综述中,我们将讨论ACS发病率下降的潜在原因。此外,我们将讨论新冠肺炎大流行期间ACS的管理,并将讨论ACS的结果。最近的研究结果:不愿寻求医疗接触(为了避免进一步加重卫生系统的负担,或由于担心在住院期间感染新冠肺炎)和无法获得医疗服务似乎是重要因素。这可能导致第一次医疗接触时间的症状发作增加,以及院外心脏骤停的发生率增加。观察到微创治疗的趋势(NSTEMI患者的微创冠状动脉造影和STEMI患者的“纤维蛋白溶解优先”),尽管观察到了很大的变化,一些中心的早期微创治疗相对增加。与未感染新冠肺炎的ACS患者相比,患有ACS并伴有COVID-19]感染的患者的预后更差。所有这些都导致新冠肺炎大流行期间ACS患者的临床结果恶化。有趣的是,人员配备和病床短缺导致低风险STEMI患者非常早出院(初次PCI后24小时)的实验,预后非常好,住院时间显著缩短。摘要:在新冠肺炎大流行期间,ACS的发病率和入院率降低,症状出现到首次医疗接触时间延长,出院率增加。观察到微创治疗的趋势。新冠肺炎大流行期间出现ACS的患者的结果更糟。另一方面,低风险患者的实验性早期出院可能会缓解医疗系统的压力。这些举措,以及降低ACS症状患者不愿寻求医疗帮助的策略,对于改善ACS患者在未来流行病中的预后至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine
Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: This journal aims to review the most important, recently published treatment-related advances in cardiovascular medicine. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to elucidate novel approaches to treatment in those affected by the spectrum of cardiovascular-related diseases and conditions.    We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease and stroke, heart failure, pediatric and congenital heart disease, and valvular, myocardial, pericardial, and cardiopulmonary diseases. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. We also provide commentaries from well-known figures in the field, and an international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信