LGBTQ+ cultural-competence training effectiveness: Mental health organization and therapist survey outcome results from a pilot randomized controlled trial

IF 3.2 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Bradley Boekeloo, Jessica Fish, Rodman Turpin, Elizabeth M. Aparicio, Richard Shin, Michael A. Vigorito, Sean M. Lare, James S. McGraw, Evelyn King-Marshall
{"title":"LGBTQ+ cultural-competence training effectiveness: Mental health organization and therapist survey outcome results from a pilot randomized controlled trial","authors":"Bradley Boekeloo,&nbsp;Jessica Fish,&nbsp;Rodman Turpin,&nbsp;Elizabeth M. Aparicio,&nbsp;Richard Shin,&nbsp;Michael A. Vigorito,&nbsp;Sean M. Lare,&nbsp;James S. McGraw,&nbsp;Evelyn King-Marshall","doi":"10.1002/cpp.2893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer/questioning and other sexual and gender diverse (LGBTQ+) persons frequently lack access to mental health service organizations (MHOs) and therapists who are competent with LGBTQ+ clients. Existing continuing education programmes to better equip therapists to work with LGBTQ+ clients are often not widely accessible or skills focused, evaluated for effectiveness and inclusive of MHO administrators who can address the organizational climate needed for therapist effectiveness. A virtual, face-to-face, multi-level (administrators and therapists) and multi-strategy (technical assistance, workshop and clinical consultations) LGBTQ+ cultural competence training—the Sexual and Gender Diversity Learning Community (SGDLC)—was tested in a pilot randomized controlled trial. Ten organizations were randomly assigned to the intervention (SGDLC plus free online videos) or control (free online videos only) group. Pretest/posttest Organization LGBTQ+ Climate Surveys (<i>n</i> = 10 MHOs) and pretest/posttest Therapist LGBTQ+ Competence Self-Assessments (<i>n</i> = 48 therapists) were administered. Results showed that at pretest, average ratings across organization LGBTQ+ climate survey items were low; twice as many items improved on average in the intervention (10/18 items) than control (5/18 items) group organizations. At pretest, therapist average scores (range 0–1) were highest for knowledge (0.88), followed by affirmative attitudes (0.81), practice self-efficacy (0.81), affirmative practices (0.75) and commitment to continued learning (0.69). Pretest/posttest change scores were higher for the intervention relative to the control group regarding therapist self-reported affirmative attitudes (cumulative ordinal ratio [OR] = 3.29; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.73, 6.26), practice self-efficacy (OR = 5.28, 95% CI = 2.00, 13.93) and affirmative practices (OR = 3.12, 95% CI = 1.18, 8.25). Average therapist and administrator satisfaction scores were high for the SGDLC. These findings suggest the SGDLC training can affect organizational- and therapist-level changes that may benefit LGBTQ+ clients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpp.2893","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.2893","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer/questioning and other sexual and gender diverse (LGBTQ+) persons frequently lack access to mental health service organizations (MHOs) and therapists who are competent with LGBTQ+ clients. Existing continuing education programmes to better equip therapists to work with LGBTQ+ clients are often not widely accessible or skills focused, evaluated for effectiveness and inclusive of MHO administrators who can address the organizational climate needed for therapist effectiveness. A virtual, face-to-face, multi-level (administrators and therapists) and multi-strategy (technical assistance, workshop and clinical consultations) LGBTQ+ cultural competence training—the Sexual and Gender Diversity Learning Community (SGDLC)—was tested in a pilot randomized controlled trial. Ten organizations were randomly assigned to the intervention (SGDLC plus free online videos) or control (free online videos only) group. Pretest/posttest Organization LGBTQ+ Climate Surveys (n = 10 MHOs) and pretest/posttest Therapist LGBTQ+ Competence Self-Assessments (n = 48 therapists) were administered. Results showed that at pretest, average ratings across organization LGBTQ+ climate survey items were low; twice as many items improved on average in the intervention (10/18 items) than control (5/18 items) group organizations. At pretest, therapist average scores (range 0–1) were highest for knowledge (0.88), followed by affirmative attitudes (0.81), practice self-efficacy (0.81), affirmative practices (0.75) and commitment to continued learning (0.69). Pretest/posttest change scores were higher for the intervention relative to the control group regarding therapist self-reported affirmative attitudes (cumulative ordinal ratio [OR] = 3.29; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.73, 6.26), practice self-efficacy (OR = 5.28, 95% CI = 2.00, 13.93) and affirmative practices (OR = 3.12, 95% CI = 1.18, 8.25). Average therapist and administrator satisfaction scores were high for the SGDLC. These findings suggest the SGDLC training can affect organizational- and therapist-level changes that may benefit LGBTQ+ clients.

Abstract Image

LGBTQ+ 文化能力培训的有效性:心理健康组织和治疗师调查随机对照试验的结果。
女同性恋者、男同性恋者、双性恋者、变性者、同性恋者/有疑问者以及其他性取向和性别多样化(LGBTQ+)者经常无法获得心理健康服务机构(MHOs)的服务,也无法获得能够胜任 LGBTQ+ 客户工作的治疗师的服务。现有的继续教育项目往往不能使治疗师更好地为 LGBTQ+ 客户提供服务,也不能使治疗师广泛地获得技能,对其有效性进行评估,并让 MHO 管理人员参与其中,以营造治疗师有效性所需的组织氛围。在一项试点随机对照试验中,对一种虚拟、面对面、多层次(管理者和治疗师)、多策略(技术援助、研讨会和临床咨询)的 LGBTQ+ 文化能力培训--性与性别多样性学习社区(SGDLC)--进行了测试。十个组织被随机分配到干预组(SGDLC 加免费在线视频)或对照组(仅免费在线视频)。进行了组织 LGBTQ+ 环境调查(n = 10 MHOs)和治疗师 LGBTQ+ 能力自我评估(n = 48 治疗师)的前测/后测。结果显示,在测试前,各组织 LGBTQ+ 气候调查项目的平均评分较低;干预组组织(10/18 个项目)比对照组组织(5/18 个项目)平均改善的项目多一倍。在测试前,治疗师平均得分(0-1 分)最高的是知识(0.88 分),其次是平权态度(0.81 分)、实践自我效能(0.81 分)、平权实践(0.75 分)和继续学习的承诺(0.69 分)。与对照组相比,干预组在治疗师自我报告的肯定态度(累积序数比 [OR] = 3.29;95% 置信区间 [CI] = 1.73,6.26)、实践自我效能感(OR = 5.28,95% CI = 2.00,13.93)和肯定实践(OR = 3.12,95% CI = 1.18,8.25)方面的试验前/试验后变化得分更高。治疗师和管理者对 SGDLC 的平均满意度很高。这些研究结果表明,SGDLC 培训可以影响组织和治疗师层面的变化,从而使 LGBTQ+ 客户受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy aims to keep clinical psychologists and psychotherapists up to date with new developments in their fields. The Journal will provide an integrative impetus both between theory and practice and between different orientations within clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy will be a forum in which practitioners can present their wealth of expertise and innovations in order to make these available to a wider audience. Equally, the Journal will contain reports from researchers who want to address a larger clinical audience with clinically relevant issues and clinically valid research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信