Long-term effectiveness of conservative management for lateral epicondylitis: a meta-analysis.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Qiaojie Chen, Pingping Shen, Bo Zhang, Yang Chen, Chunli Zheng
{"title":"Long-term effectiveness of conservative management for lateral epicondylitis: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Qiaojie Chen,&nbsp;Pingping Shen,&nbsp;Bo Zhang,&nbsp;Yang Chen,&nbsp;Chunli Zheng","doi":"10.2340/jphs.v58.12333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the long-term (>12 months) effectiveness of conservative management for lateral epicondylitis.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed and Embase databases were searched for relevant studies from inception to March 2023.</p><p><strong>Study selection and data extraction: </strong>Only English-written randomized controlled trial (RCT) with data download as well as follow up ≥12 months were acceptable. Raw data were extracted into a predefined worksheet, and quality analysis was conducted based on the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool version 2 (RoB2).</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>The standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) could significantly relive pain for lateral epicondylitis patients in the long term (SMD: -0.19, 95% CI [-0.36, -0.02]); however, there was no significant difference between ESWT and control groups in long-term function outcome (SMD: 0.24, 95% CI [-0.02, -0.49]). No significant difference could be observed between (1) exercise and control groups in pain (SMD: -0.21, 95% CI [-0.60, 0.18]) or function (SMD: 0.06, 95% CI [-0.11, 0.23]), (2) corticosteroids and placebo groups in pain (SMD: 0.70, 95% CI [-0.43, 1.82]) or function (SMD: -0.02, 95% CI [-0.36, 0.31]), and (3) platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in pain (SMD: -0.30, 95% CI [-0.85, 0.25]) and function (SMD: -0.08, 95% CI [-0.78, 0.62]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present conventional conservative management for lateral epicondylitis, with the exception of ESWT, a lack adequate evidence supporting their long-term effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":16847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/jphs.v58.12333","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the long-term (>12 months) effectiveness of conservative management for lateral epicondylitis.

Data sources: PubMed and Embase databases were searched for relevant studies from inception to March 2023.

Study selection and data extraction: Only English-written randomized controlled trial (RCT) with data download as well as follow up ≥12 months were acceptable. Raw data were extracted into a predefined worksheet, and quality analysis was conducted based on the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool version 2 (RoB2).

Data synthesis: The standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated.

Results: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) could significantly relive pain for lateral epicondylitis patients in the long term (SMD: -0.19, 95% CI [-0.36, -0.02]); however, there was no significant difference between ESWT and control groups in long-term function outcome (SMD: 0.24, 95% CI [-0.02, -0.49]). No significant difference could be observed between (1) exercise and control groups in pain (SMD: -0.21, 95% CI [-0.60, 0.18]) or function (SMD: 0.06, 95% CI [-0.11, 0.23]), (2) corticosteroids and placebo groups in pain (SMD: 0.70, 95% CI [-0.43, 1.82]) or function (SMD: -0.02, 95% CI [-0.36, 0.31]), and (3) platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in pain (SMD: -0.30, 95% CI [-0.85, 0.25]) and function (SMD: -0.08, 95% CI [-0.78, 0.62]).

Conclusion: The present conventional conservative management for lateral epicondylitis, with the exception of ESWT, a lack adequate evidence supporting their long-term effectiveness.

保守治疗外侧上髁炎的长期疗效:荟萃分析。
目的:探讨保守治疗外侧上髁炎的长期(>12个月)疗效。数据来源:检索PubMed和Embase数据库,检索自成立至2023年3月的相关研究。研究选择和数据提取:只接受英文书面随机对照试验(RCT),数据下载,随访≥12个月。将原始数据提取到预定义的工作表中,并根据Cochrane风险偏倚工具版本2 (RoB2)进行质量分析。资料综合:计算具有95%置信区间(CI)的标准化平均差(SMD)。结果:体外冲击波治疗(ESWT)能显著缓解外上髁炎患者的长期疼痛(SMD: -0.19, 95% CI [-0.36, -0.02]);然而,ESWT组与对照组在长期功能结局方面无显著差异(SMD: 0.24, 95% CI[-0.02, -0.49])。(1)运动组和对照组在疼痛方面(SMD: -0.21, 95% CI[-0.60, 0.18])或功能方面(SMD: 0.06, 95% CI[-0.11, 0.23]),(2)皮质类固醇和安慰剂组在疼痛方面(SMD: 0.70, 95% CI[-0.43, 1.82])或功能方面(SMD: -0.02, 95% CI[-0.36, 0.31]),以及(3)富血小板血浆(PRP)在疼痛方面(SMD: -0.30, 95% CI[-0.85, 0.25])和功能方面(SMD: -0.08, 95% CI[-0.78, 0.62])均无显著差异。结论:目前常规保守治疗外上髁炎,除ESWT外,缺乏足够的证据支持其长期有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
108
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The purpose of the Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery is to serve as an international forum for plastic surgery, hand surgery and related research. Interest is focused on original articles on basic research and clinical evaluation. The scope of the journal comprises: • Articles concerning operative methods and follow-up studies • Research articles on subjects related to plastic and hand surgery • Articles on cranio-maxillofacial surgery, including cleft lip and palate surgery. Extended issues are published occasionally, dealing with special topics such as microvascular surgery, craniofacial surgery, or burns. Supplements, usually doctoral theses, may also be published. The journal is published for the Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica society and sponsored by the Key Foundation, Sweden. The journal was previously published as Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信