Cognitive Maintaining Factors and Social Anxiety: The Mediating Role of Cognitive Fusion and Experiential Avoidance.

IF 0.6 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Esmail Soltani, Quincy J J Wong, Laaya Ahmadzadeh, Seyede Sajedeh Sheikholeslami
{"title":"Cognitive Maintaining Factors and Social Anxiety: The Mediating Role of Cognitive Fusion and Experiential Avoidance.","authors":"Esmail Soltani,&nbsp;Quincy J J Wong,&nbsp;Laaya Ahmadzadeh,&nbsp;Seyede Sajedeh Sheikholeslami","doi":"10.1891/JCP-2022-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognitive fusion (CF) and experiential avoidance (EA) are two constructs of acceptance and commitment therapy that contribute to psychological distress. The current study aimed to examine whether CF and EA accounted for variance in the relationships between key cognitive maintaining factors of social anxiety and indicators of social anxiety. This issue was investigated using a longitudinal design in a nonclinical sample. Participants (<i>N</i> = 361) completed baseline measures of CF, EA, cognitive maintaining factors, and indicators of social anxiety, and the measures of indicators of social anxiety were recompleted 6 weeks later (<i>N</i> = 262). Results showed that baseline postevent processing had significant indirect effects on fear of negative evaluation at follow-up: (a) via CF, (b) via EA, and (c) via a serial pathway of CF → EA. Interventions that aim to reduce CF, in particular, may be a priority in reducing fear of negative evaluation associated with postevent processing.</p>","PeriodicalId":47207,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/JCP-2022-0010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cognitive fusion (CF) and experiential avoidance (EA) are two constructs of acceptance and commitment therapy that contribute to psychological distress. The current study aimed to examine whether CF and EA accounted for variance in the relationships between key cognitive maintaining factors of social anxiety and indicators of social anxiety. This issue was investigated using a longitudinal design in a nonclinical sample. Participants (N = 361) completed baseline measures of CF, EA, cognitive maintaining factors, and indicators of social anxiety, and the measures of indicators of social anxiety were recompleted 6 weeks later (N = 262). Results showed that baseline postevent processing had significant indirect effects on fear of negative evaluation at follow-up: (a) via CF, (b) via EA, and (c) via a serial pathway of CF → EA. Interventions that aim to reduce CF, in particular, may be a priority in reducing fear of negative evaluation associated with postevent processing.

认知维持因素与社交焦虑:认知融合与经验回避的中介作用。
认知融合(CF)和经验回避(EA)是接纳和承诺治疗的两个构念,对心理困扰有影响。本研究旨在检验CF和EA是否解释了社交焦虑关键认知维持因素与社交焦虑指标之间关系的差异。在非临床样本中使用纵向设计来调查这个问题。参与者(N = 361)完成了CF、EA、认知维持因素和社交焦虑指标的基线测量,6周后重新完成了社交焦虑指标的测量(N = 262)。结果显示,基线事件后加工对随访时的负面评价恐惧有显著的间接影响:(a)通过CF, (b)通过EA,以及(c)通过CF→EA的一系列途径。特别是旨在减少CF的干预措施,可能是减少与事件后加工相关的负面评价恐惧的优先考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy
Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy is devoted to advancing the science and clinical practice of cognitive-behavior therapy. This includes a range of interventions including cognitive therapy, rational-emotive behavior therapy, dialectical behavior therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy, and mindfulness approaches. The journal publishes empirical papers, including case studies, along with review articles, papers that integrate cognitive-behavior therapy with other systems, and practical "how to" articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信